Barack Obama, Bill Ayers and the Mainstream Media:
Lies, Damn Lies, AP “Analysis” and CNN “Fact Checks”
The AP served as a mouthpiece of the Obama campaign with the publication of DOUGLASS K. DANIEL’s “Analysis: Palin’s words carry racial tinge“.
Daniel not only attacked Republican Vice-presidential candidate, Sarah Palin, for bringing up the connection between Barack Obama and domestic terrorist, Bill Ayers–in effect, the AP hack calls Palin a liar.
Then he called Palin, in effect, a racist.
Her reference to Obama’s relationship with William Ayers, a member of the Vietnam-era Weather Underground, was exaggerated at best if not outright false. No evidence shows they were “pals” or even close when they worked on community boards years ago and Ayers hosted a political event for Obama early in his career.
“Douglass, I tawt I taw a racist!”
After the AP and CNN’s (Non-Performance) on the John Edwards Scandal, why would they expect their readers/viewers to trust them?
Daniel might have amended his sentence to “no evidence that the AP could uncover”.
The AP, readers will remember, is that shining star of investigative journalism that imposed a blackout on John Edwards’ scandal news for ten months–in the midst of Edwards running for president. After Edwards confessed, the AP scrambled–not to check out leads or follow the Edwards hush money trail–but to try and excuse its lack of investigation, reporting, ethics, standards and basic human curiosity.
Guess who the AP’s chief apologist in explaining why the “news” organization didn’t report any John Edwards’ news–until he gave them his blessing and confessed?
Why, it was Douglass K. Daniel!
ALSO at DBKP: Click on banner to access 100 DBKP stories and videos on the John Edwards scandal. |
First, Edwards confessed. Then Daniel confessed that “Reporters found Edwards’ affair tough to prove.
Well, AP reporters found it tough to prove.
Just like Douglass K. Daniel finds that there is “no evidence” that Obama and Ayers were “palling around”.
As in the John Edwards affair, it’s too tough for the AP to assign a reporter to the Obama-Ayers story: that might result in an AP reporter giving his bosses some unpleasant news.
Better to let others do the heavy lifting, then send in Douglass K. Daniel to apologize later for the AP not doing its job.
“Douglass, come quick! There a racist over there!”
Reaction to the AP’s attack provoked a blizzard of responses by the right blogosphere: practically the only media (The Wall Street Journal and FoxNews excepted) that’s been asking questions and digging through Obama-Ayers documents.
What was the reaction–and what are the documented connections between Barack Obama and Bill Ayers?
Continue reading: Sarah Palin on Obama-Ayers: As Fast as Others Uncover, The MSM Covers Up
by Mondoreb
Source: Sarah Palin on Obama-Ayers: As Fast as Others Uncover, The MSM Covers Up
Mondoreb blogs at Death By 1000 Papercuts. Interested readers can e-mail him at
mondoreb@gmail.com. All DBKP stories are filed under Mondoreb at BNN.
1 user commented in " Sarah Palin on Obama-Ayers Connection: Others Uncover, the MSM Covers Up "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI am always amused by these mindless Obamabot minions who show up in droves at blogs all across the web. Some of those folks are paid staffers, some are volunteers, many are Obamabot zombies.
Discussing Obama’s friendship with terrorist Ayers is fair game. Discussing Palin’s “Troopergate” affair is fair game. Discussing Obama’s decades long close association with “God damn America” Wright is fair game. Discussing Todd Palin’s past participation in this Alaska “secession” organization is fair game.
Those topics and many other topics are fair game while those discussing relate facts and truths. These issues point to a person’s character and judgement. Those issues are only fair game when discussed with maturity and common sense. Most, not all, but most of what I read being written by Obama staffers at blogs, most of this is simply not true. I also read “stretching of the truth” by McCain supporters, but much less in number and much less in wild claims.
Part of this disparity in numbers between Obama and McCain blog commentaries is Obama can afford to pay people to work blogs in massive numbers. McCain cannot afford to have the same done.
A point which is critically important is all these “bad” people associated with Palin or McCain, none of those people blew up buildings nor perpetrated violent terrorist acts upon our country. Yes, there is Troopergate and there is Keating, there are other incidents of not good favor, but none of those incidents involve widespread terrorist attacks on our country, much like the 9-11 horror. Ayers and his old friends are terrorists, this is beyond debate.
Very few, most likely no readers here would associate with Ayers. This would be like associating with Islamic terrorists. This is distasteful, this is inappropriate, this is selling out your dignity at a cheap price. Obama using Ayers to launch his political career, Obama maintaining friendship with Ayers, Obama simply being in the company of Ayers, is a slap across the face of our country and is for Obama to sell his dignity to further his political career. This does call into question Obama’s character and his judgement.
Obama associating with Ayers is like one of us playing golf with O.J. Simpson.
These issues are fair political game but must be addressed with fairness and truth. We cannot afford to play deceitful games; our country’s future is at stake.
Okpulot Taha
Choctaw Nation
Leave A Reply