Ms. Steinem: That chromosome AK Gov. Sarah Palin and NY Sen. Hilary Clinton share is the same one that you and Palin – and all women – share as well. But it is Palin – whom Cindy McCain described as a “reform-minded … hockey-mommin’ … basketball shootin’ … moose huntin’ … fly-fishin’ … pistol-packing … mother of five†in her speech to the RNC – who more closely resembles the typical American woman, not you.
American Thinker editor Thomas Lifson describes the disconnect:
Liberals have long lamented the existence of two nations in America. They are right to do so today, but in a way they never meant. It is not the divide between rich and poor which soon will be causing serious pain on the left. Sarah Palin’s pending nomination for Vice President is exposing the depth of the cultural divide between Middle America and the leftists who have taken over the education, media, and cultural establishment of our country. …
She has the rarest of qualities: authenticity. Media and Beltway types can’t fathom what that is. It goes right over their heads. Not even on the radar screen. Her multiple facets – beauty queen, moose hunter, mother, member of an Assembly of God Church, and ferocious reformer of corrupt politics may baffle sophisticates, but ordinary Americans see all the pieces fitting together, and they recognize a type of person they know and love.
 And as The Guardian’s Paul Harris notes:Â
She does not look like a normal politician. She looks like what she says she is at heart: a mother who got into politics via the parent-teacher association at her local school. Or to put it another way: she looks like the voters she is aiming at.
It’s obvious from your op-ed in the Los Angeles Times that it’s been a long time since you’ve hung out with women who do not share your world view, women who can relate to Palin and find a role model in her. Here are a few of them:
[F]or many Republicans and right-leaning independents, Palin’s arrival comes almost as a relief. For them, Palin’s biography and lifestyle reflect aspects of their own lives rarely seen among women on the national stage.
Some are women from rural states where hunting and fishing are as much women’s pastimes as men’s, and who have hungered to see a woman on the national political stage who understands that. Deanna Wallace, an 18-year-old college student and alternative Republican convention delegate from Shreveport, La., a “huge tomboy” growing up, loves football and got a gun for her 13th birthday. She identifies strongly with Palin, who earned the nickname “Sarah Barracuda” on the high school basketball court and is a lifetime member of the NRA.
“I think people have the idea of Southern belles for so long, and we’re tired of it,” Wallace said. “We want to be strong women in our own right, not what society expects of women.” And after decades of hearing women who favor abortion rights argue that the male-dominated Republican Party could not possibly understand the plight of women facing an unwanted pregnancy and have no business regulating abortion, women who oppose abortion say Palin is a living validation of their point of view. – The Boston Globe, September 2, 2008
“I have been hearing from women, especially women who didn’t go to Harvard or Yale Law School, saying, ‘Hold on, this is a woman we can actually relate to,'” says Susan Estrich, a Democratic strategist. “The very fact that she could go from the PTA to the vice presidency is the story they connect to — without regard to her position on abortion.”
“I do not consider myself a feminist, only because of what the feminist agenda is,” says Sheryl Fikse, a manager at a high-tech firm in Atlanta who has three children. “I consider myself an empowered woman. Sarah Palin is not a shrinking violet. I love the ‘Sarah Barracuda’ name. If a woman has worked at any corporate level, you have to be tough, but you can do it in a feminine way.” …
“She is very much like my wife, assertive, very focused, able to balance a lot of different things,” says Tim Fikse, husband of Mrs. Fikse, the high-tech-firm manager. “Good for Hillary for what she is doing. But there is a silent majority that is more like Sarah Palin.” – The Wall Street Journal, September 3, 2008
Kimberly Speranza is not only emblematic of the kind of religious conservative voter Palin was tapped to “energize,” she’s uncannily similar to “Sarah Barracuda.” Raised in rural, working-class Nebraska, Kim’s a veteran snowmobiler, has hunted pheasant, slopped hogs and butchered and cleaned chickens, and worked as a corporate executive. …
Kim, who’s 42, lives in Palos Verdes with her husband, Scott, 41, and their 3-year-old twins. …Â
The Speranzas work in the health insurance industry, get their news from National Public Radio as well as Fox and CNN, and describe their religious affiliation as “evangelical and as far right in the Christian right as you can go.” And although Kim says she supports abstinence being taught in schools alongside traditional sex education (ditto for creationism and evolution), she and Scott both say Palin makes them feel as if they have a voice in the political arena.
“She reminds me of my grandmother, who worked on the farm and could hunt and grow food and raise kids and have two of them die and still go on. You don’t see that in politics a lot, and you don’t get it from going to Harvard, but that doesn’t mean it’s not valid.” – Los Angeles Times, September 6, 2008
You write that “[f]eminism has never been about getting a job for one woman. It’s about making life more fair for women everywhere†– which is kinda ironic, as you’ve been a professional feminist for most of your life and the gig’s been rather lucrative – and raise the specter of a McCain-Palin administration “invit[ing] government into the wombs of women.†Â
But you are so utterly obsessed with preventing women’s wombs from being used for what they are biologically meant to be used that you have accomplished little to help women who bear and raise their children instead of aborting them juggle their work and family responsibilities.
For this reason, you and NOW are irrelevant to the lives of most women. In her answer to your op-ed, columnist and radio talk show host Tammy Bruce – a former president of the Los Angeles chapter of NOW – writes that voters are “deciding women’s rights must be more than a slogan and actually belong to every woman, not just the sort approved of by left-wing special interest groupsâ€:
Palin’s candidacy brings both figurative and literal feminist change. The simple act of thinking outside the liberal box, which has insisted for generations that only liberals and Democrats can be trusted on issues of import to women, is the political equivalent of a nuclear explosion.
The idea of feminists willing to look to the right changes not only electoral politics, but will put more women in power at lightning speed as we move from being taken for granted to being pursued, nominated and appointed and ultimately, sworn in.
It should be no surprise that the Democratic response to the McCain-Palin ticket was to immediately attack by playing the liberal trump card that keeps Democrats in line – the abortion card – where the party daily tells restless feminists the other side is going to police their wombs.
The power of that accusation is interesting, coming from the Democrats – a group that just told the world that if you have ovaries, then you don’t count. …
The Republicans are now making direct appeals to Clinton supporters, knowingly crafting a political base that would include pro-choice voters.
And it’s not just Palin’s views on abortion that you find distasteful – it’s her, personally, which goes to show that you look down on the very women you are claiming to champion. The Journal correctly notes that “class is emerging as one of the factors that separates Gov. Palin from other politiciansâ€:
She is by many measures one of the least-pedigreed politicians to be on a national ticket. While Hillary Clinton appealed to female working-class voters this year, she also attended Wellesley College and Yale Law School.
“If instead of the University of Idaho Sarah Palin had a degree from Harvard, would we look at her differently?” asks Peggy Lehner, a homemaker from a Dayton, Ohio, suburb who also serves as a part-time city councilor and is a Republican activist. “If she had two kids instead of five? If her husband were the CEO of a major corporation based in Alaska?”
And yet, unworthy as you think she is, Palin has accomplished something that few women leaders around the world have – she got where she got without “a family connection to a politically powerful male,†according to Pamela Paxton, associate professor of sociology and political science at Ohio State University:
“In many countries with traditional cultures, women are easily seen as ‘stand-ins’ for their father or husband,†said Paxton, who is co-author of the book “Women, Politics, and Power: A Global Perspective” (Pine Forge Press, 2007) with Melanie Hughes from the University of Pittsburgh. Often, women leaders achieve power when their male relative dies, is martyred, or otherwise is forced to leave office. …
“Hillary Clinton followed a typical model by following her husband, Bill Clinton. I had expected that the United States would be less traditional, and have a first woman contender who arrived in politics independently.
“Sarah Palin is certainly unusual in a worldwide context in that her political path has been hers alone,†Paxton said.
You thought you were denigrating Palin when you characterized her as “Phyllis Schlafly, only younger,†but Palin and Schlafly figured out something you still haven’t – how to “have it all†without resorting to abortion:
“People who don’t have children, or who only have one or two, don’t comprehend what it’s like to have five,” said Schlafly.
“I had six children,” Schlafly said. “I ran for Congress. An organized mother puts it all together. The time management mother uses the older ones to help with the younger ones. You should read that old book ‘Cheaper by the Dozen.'”
We are Sarah Palin. And Ms. Steinem, you will hear us roar on Election Day.
cc:Â Andrea Michell; Sally Quinn; Susan Reimer; Judith Warner
Note: The Stiletto writes about politics and other stuff at The Stiletto Blog, chosen an Official Honoree in the Political Blogs category by the judges of the 12th Annual Webby Awards (the Oscars of the online universe) along with CNN Political Ticker, Swampland (Time magazine) and The Caucus (The New York Times).
6 users commented in " Sarah Palin: The Modern Feminist Ideal "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackbackpretty stupid, axe murdering women also are female.
Palin just happens to be female but her politics are the same as men in her ilk. Oh what a surprise. Someone you never heard of two weeks ago, who meant absolutely nothing then, from a state you only vaguely know the location of, now she is superwoman, great.
Some one less experienced than all three of tehse candidates, lead her National Guard to Iraq? Fights Ruddia in the Aleutians? Any more nonsense you need to bring up?
Oh yeah, home schools her kids and teaches abstinance education. Her one pupil is prgnant at 17.
Great leadership there, isn’t it?
The world and history will see what a joke this is even if you don’t What if she became president? You think this is a movie with a script?
She probably is closer to teh ignorant typical American than Hillary (who you made believe that you liked)
Read this for your daughters!
Senator Clinton and Governor Palin are proof that women can and do diverge on important issues.
Even on the question of whether women should vote!
Most people are totally in the dark about HOW the suffragettes won votes for women, and what life was REALLY like for women before they did.
Suffragettes were opposed by many women who were what was known as ‘anti.’
The most influential ‘anti’ lived in the White House. First Lady Edith Wilson was a wealthy Washington widow who married President Wilson in 1915.
Her role in Wilson’s decision to jail and torture Alice Paul and hundreds of other suffragettes will never be fully known, but she was outraged that these women picketed her husband’s White House.
I’d like to share a women’s history learning opportunity…
“The Privilege of Voting” is a new free e-mail series that follows eight great women from 1912 – 1920 to reveal ALL that happened to set the stage for women to win the vote.
It’s a real-life soap opera! And it’s ALL true!
Powerful suffragettes Alice Paul and Emmeline Pankhurst are featured, along with TWO gorgeous presidential mistresses, First Lady Edith Wilson, Edith Wharton, Isadora Duncan and Alice Roosevelt.
There are tons of heartache on the rocky road to the ballot box, but in the end, women WIN!
Thanks to the suffragettes, women have voices and choices!
Exciting, sequential episodes are great to read on coffeebreaks, or anytime.
Subscribe free at
http://www.CoffeebreakReaders.com/subscribe.html
Why’s everyone picking on Gloria Steinem….she’s the sacrifical lamb the rightwing has decided to hold up as their straw dog? This is one feminist who thinks Sarah Palin is off the deep end. She’s exploiting her daughter, Bristol, and her son, Trig, for her political gain. She is hypocritical. Her government insurance will pay for her daughter’s birth and her wellbeing, yet Palin cuts $$ to young mothers in need. Palin denounces birth control and sings the abstinance song, yet her own daughter gets pregnant. It’s likely she wouldn’t have if she’d had birth control. This woman does not promote family values. Nowhere near it.
betabel fep: In the beginning The Stiletto was not in Hillary’s corner because she felt her candidacy was based solely on her husband’s coattails. But as the primary season wore on and she won debate after debate against Obama (once Edwards dropped out and she was able to go one-on-one with him) and her toughness towards the end, she won The Stiletto’s admiration and respect. She probably could have beaten McCain. Obama missed a big opportunity to put a her on the ballot and now that he is not the only “historical candidate” in the race I bet he wishes he had put her on the ballot.
broussca: Name one thing Steinem has done for women with children – esp women with special needs children. Nothing. Special needs children are supposed to be aborted because they will be a drag on the mother’s life. And if you actually use your womb to bear children then you’re on your own since Steinem has not been able to accomplish something as simple as employer-provided daycare.
Finally you have no way of knowing whether Bristol and her boyfriend were using birth control so your points regarding the pregnancy are invalid.
Sarah believes the world is 6,000 years old. She is against choice even in the cases of rape and incest, she asks that we “respect” her daughters “decision” BUT would see that judges are appointed that would REFUSE to allow my daughter the right to “choose.” She believes the war is a challenge from “God.” She wants “God” to support her choice for a pipeline in Alaska.
The woman is not STUPID she is just OUTRAGIOUSLY IGNORANT. Surely, America has had enough of ignorant.
Broussca I would have to agree with poster above. I wonder if you have ever had a child?
If you had you would know that any 17 year girl knows what’s best for them and it may not be what they were taught. I mean don’t you remember what it was like to be 17?? I surely didn’t follow my mom’s teachings or advice!
But I will tell you now I am probably MORE conservative than my mom! Her daughter was planning to marry this boy before she got pregnant. The entire TOWN knew about the pregnancy so it wasn’t hidden. I can’t believe how many women are pissed off that Sarah chose to bring a child into the world and care for it. She didn’t put the kid up for adoption she isn’t on welfare trying to make more money. She loves her CHILD.. and for other women to say she should have aborted a defective baby. Wow.. that is just so wrong. As a mom myself I can’t imagine what it would be like to find out a child I was carrying was sick (with Down’s or any other disease) and it would be up to my and my family to decide what is best for us. I really don’t think it’s right for you or any other women to say she should have aborted a baby that was a “burdern” I mean where do we go from that? A women at 80 doesn’t deserve health care because she is too old????
Leave A Reply