[I don’t offer Webster G. Tarpley, a conspiracy theorist, as a final authority on this matter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webster_Tarpley
However, the precedent of the Israeli destruction of the infrastructure of Lebanon, which was clearly supported and encouraged by the Bush administration, looms as a possible precedent for a brutal sneak attack on Iran — if not next week, sometime during Bush’s remaining time in office. Our fleet has assembled in the Persian Gulf where U.S. Middle East forces have been placed under the supervision of a U.S. naval officer. We have seen the madness of Iraq this past four years and the neocons have been loudly endorsing an attack on Iran:
http://www.commondreams.org/views02/1110-07.htm
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/816046.html
I think we had all best listen up now. Such an attack would be a disaster for all involved. Ed Kent]
…………………….
Operation Bite: April 6 sneak attack by US forces against Iran planned,
Russian military sources warn
By Webster G. Tarpley
Online Journal Contributing Writer
Mar 26, 2007, 01:02
WASHINGTON DC, — The long awaited US military attack on Iran is now on
track for the first week of April, specifically for 4 am on April 6, the
Good Friday opening of Easter weekend, writes the well-known Russian
journalist Andrei Uglanov in the Moscow weekly ³Argumenty Nedeli.² Uglanov cites Russian military experts close to the Russian General Staff for his account.
The attack is slated to last for 12 hours, according to Uglanov, from 4 am until 4 pm local time. Friday is the sabbath in Iran. In the course of the attack, code named Operation Bite, about 20 targets are marked for bombing; the list includes uranium enrichment facilities, research centers, and laboratories.
The first reactor at the Bushehr nuclear plant, where Russian engineers are working, is supposed to be spared from destruction. The US attack plan reportedly calls for the Iranian air defense system to be degraded, for numerous Iranian warships to be sunk in the Persian Gulf, and for the most important headquarters of the Iranian armed forces to be wiped out.
The attacks will be mounted from a number of bases, including the island of Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. Diego Garcia is currently home to B-52 bombers equipped with standoff missiles. Also participating in the air strikes will be US naval aviation from aircraft carriers in the Persian Gulf, as well as from those of the Sixth Fleet in the Mediterranean. Additional cruise missiles will be fired from submarines in the Indian Ocean and off the coast of the Arabian peninsula. The goal is allegedly to set back Iran¹s nuclear program by several years, writes Uglanov, whose article was reissued by RIA-Novosti in various languages, but apparently not English, several days ago. The story is the top item on numerous Italian and German blogs, but so far appears to have been ignored by US websites.
Observers comment that this dispatch represents a high-level orchestrated leak from the Kremlin, in effect a war warning, which draws on the formidable resources of the Russian intelligence services, and which deserves to be taken with the utmost seriousness by pro-peace forces around the world.
Asked by RIA-Novosti to comment on the Uglanov report, retired Colonel
General Leonid Ivashov confirmed its essential features in a March 21
interview: ³I have no doubt that there will be an operation, or more
precisely a violent action against Iran.² Ivashov, who has reportedly served at various times as an informal advisor to Russian President Vladimir Putin, is currently the vice president of the Moscow Academy for Geopolitical Sciences.
Ivashov attributed decisive importance to the decision of the Democratic
leadership of the US House of Representatives to remove language from the just-passed Iraq supplemental military appropriations bill that would have demanded that Bush come to Congress before launching an attack on Iran. Ivashov pointed out that the language was eliminated under pressure from AIPAC, the lobbing group representing the Israeli extreme right, and from Israeli Foreign Minister Tsipi Livni.
³We have drawn the unmistakable conclusion that this operation will take
place,² said Ivashov. In his opinion, the US planning does not include a
land operation: ³ Most probably there will be no ground attack, but rather massive air attacks with the goal of annihilating Iran¹s capacity for military resistance, the centers of administration, the key economic assets, and quite possibly the Iranian political leadership, or at least part of it,² he continued.
Ivashov noted that it was not to be excluded that the Pentagon would use
smaller tactical nuclear weapons against targets of the Iranian nuclear
industry. These attacks could paralyze everyday life, create panic in the population, and generally produce an atmosphere of chaos and uncertainty all over Iran, Ivashov told RIA-Novosti. ³This will unleash a struggle for power inside Iran, and then there will be a peace delegation sent in to install a pro-American government in Teheran,² Ivashov continued. One of the US goals was, in his estimation, to burnish the image of the current Republican administration, which would now be able to boast that they had wiped out the Iranian nuclear program.
Among the other outcomes, General Ivashov pointed to a partition of Iran
along the same lines as Iraq, and a subsequent carving up of the Near and Middle East into smaller regions. ³This concept worked well for them in the Balkans and will now be applied to the greater Middle East,² he commented.
³Moscow must exert Russia¹s influence by demanding an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council to deal with the current preparations for an illegal use of force against Iran and the destruction of the basis of the United Nations Charter,² said General Ivashov. ³In this context Russia could cooperate with China, France and the non-permanent members of the Security Council. We need this kind of preventive action to ward off the use of force,² he concluded.
Resources:
http://fr.rian.ru/world/20070319/62260006.html
http://fr.rian.ru/world/20070321/62387717.html
Webster G. Tarpley is a journalist. Among other works, he has published an investigation on the manipulation of the Red Brigades by the Vatican¹s P2 Suite and the assassination of Aldo Moro, a non-authorized biography of George H. Bush, and more recently an analysis of the methods used to perpetrate the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Copyright © 1998-2007 Online Journal
Email Online Journal Editor
—
“A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope.” (Livy cited by Machiavelli)
—
Ed Kent 718-951-5324 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CollegeConversation
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EndingPoverty
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/440neighborhood
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/StudentConcerns
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AcademicFreedom
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrivacyRights
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Israel_Palestine
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FindingHumaneJobs
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net
5 users commented in " Rumor of U.S. Sneak Attack on Iran Planned for Next Week? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackUh, what are you guys thinking? They’ve blatently taken hostages!! Why should the world appease Iran any longer? It’s time to get tough and go get them. Iran is only doing this to raise the price of oil. Thus, more money for nukes. Can’t you guys figure that one out?
Yeah, let’s pay $4 a gallon for gas so Iran can acquire their nukes!
Go for it!!!
“If I’m in a fight with a man that’s bigger than me, I know there’s a zone I don’t go into.”
– Chris Rock, “Never Scared”
…
Believe it.
This whole thing is ridiculous, and if Islam is by it’s nature such a violent and hateful religion, how come so many of the 1.2 billion Muslims in the world are chilling out while their brothers and sisters are being tortured and murdered? Seriously, a violent and hateful religion by it’s very definition should inspire violent and hateful reactions by a whole bunch of them, perhaps 50%, or 600 million people. We don’t see that. Okay then, a violent and hateful religion should by it’s definition inspire at least a big chunk of them to retaliate with violence and hatred, or perhaps 10%, or 120 million people. We don’t see that either.
We don’t seem to remember that most of these people wanted to send their kids to America for a better education. Seriously. They don’t hate our “values”, and the average middle-eastern DVD and CD collection quickly reveals that lie. After killing over 2 million Iraqi’s starting with the Gulf War and subsequent sanctions, the criminal scum running the U.S. government are now trying to cover up how fast they’re finishing the job, and reminding us that nobody who disagrees is safe.
As for Iran, they’re next up on the PNAC plan, and since the neo-cons godfather was Leo Strauss and his godfather was Carl Schmitt, or Hitler’s lawyer, they don’t mind if billions die in World War Three…
Government Dismissed Iraq Death Toll Report In Full Knowledge It Was Likely Accurate
John Hopkins study put toll at 655,000 but they didn’t want you to know that
Infowars.net | March 27, 2007
Steve Watson
Documents obtained by the BBC under a Freedom Of Information Act request have proven that despite public dismissal of last year’s Iraq Death Toll study, published in The Lancet Medical Journal, British Government officials actually backed the methods used by scientists who concluded that more than 600,000 Iraqis have been killed since the invasion.
SOURCE FOR SURVIVAL – http://www.infowars.com/articles/iraq/death_toll_gov_dismissed_report_in_full_knowldege_it_was_accurate.htm
…
British Manufactured Gulf Maritime Border Map
No such agreed upon border between Iraq and Iran exists, measurements show ship was nearer Iranian coast
Prison Planet | March 30, 2007
Paul Joseph Watson
In claiming HMS Cornwall was within Iraqi territorial waters, the British government and the media have covered-up the fact there is no agreed upon Iraqi-Iranian maritime border, as other bizarre coincidences and dubious circumstances surrounding the hostage crisis begin to emerge.
Former British Ambassador Craig Murray and others are highlighting the fact that the maritime border between Iraq and Iran is contested, and the British have essentially manufactured a border to make it appear as if HMS Cornwall was within Iraqi territorial waters. The mainstream media has uniformly failed to address this issue.
(Continued…)
SOURCE FOR SURVIVAL – http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/iran_british_manufactured_gulf_maritime_border_map.htm
…
Iran War Underway: US and Britain Funding Right Wing Terrorists For Regime Change
The Long history of British and American covert provocation and action in Iran
Infowars.net | March 30, 2007
Steve Watson
The US and Britain are already at war with Iran, have been at war with Iran for a number of years now and are funding anti-Iranian terrorist groups inside Iran in preparation for the fallout that will occur after overt military action is commenced.
Not my words, the words of high ranking CIA officials, Defense department officials, former UN officials and retired US air force Colonels.
(Continued…)
SOURCE FOR SURVIVAL – http://www.infowars.com/articles/ww3/iran_war_underway_us_uk_funding_right_wing_terrorists_for_regime_change.htm
Bullies will be bullies as long as their safety is assured, sooo, either use the big stick or shut up, go home and scrap the military and surrender.
Russians made this comment last year around this time aswell. Hmm, Iran’s still going “strong”. Don’t see why we should beleive them this time.
All the news print is how the US is going to preventatively attack Iran, but nothing about what Iran will do in retaliation. Iran has a pre-programmed response of escalation, where her troops go to ground with prepared orders to prevent the disruption of command/control interruptions. Iran has many options for retaliation, and I bet they don’t just take the beating like Saddam, but escalate like North Korea. Frankly, I doubt many Western reporters can imagine what is about to happen. Most treat a possible American preventative attack on Iran as status quo, and only an interesting development, rather than igniting an explosion that will resound for years and years. The world can not allow Bush to continue his military imperialism with impunity-don’t look for peaceful protesters to change this stupid policy-instead look toward retaliation that does more than just cost the US money. It is too bad it has come to this: we are looking at an extended war, and probably the loss of our superpower status (this per a former US National Security Advisor).
Leave A Reply