Obama’s supposed frolicking in the back of a limo friend Larry Sinclair is once more a free man. Now I am not sure how credible Larry Sinclair is, but one has to wonder what or who was behind his latest misadventure in Washington.
Larry gave a press conference at the National Press Club on June 18. Reports that I have read, including his prepared statement show that little new and shocking evidence was presented. He did mention the name of the limo driver, but so what?
It is what happened after the press conference ended that was much more curious. Thee plain clothes DC cops arrested him on a “Fugitive from Justice†warrant from Delaware.
Larry claims that he was held in a DC jail until June 23, when he was then transported to Delaware.
I asked why there would be a “Fugitive from Justice†warrant for my arrest. I was informed that there was no such warrant issued by Delaware, but that in fact DC had made that charge against me in order for them to arrest me on the “Rule 9″ warrant that was pending from a Delaware “SEALED†Grand Jury warrant. I was told that what DC should have done was advise me to report to Delaware. This rule 9 warrant was explained to me as being nothing that anyone could call me a “Fugitive from Justice†on because I had never been served the notice, taken into custody or formally charged on as yet.
The judge in Delaware released Larry on his own recognizance, and Larry is now back home.
To say the least this is a strange story. It certainly appears at face value anyway to be a ‘flexing of some official muscle’. If Larry has no credibility why go to these lengths to ‘sicken’ him?
Larry also claims that while in jail he was denied access to the phone, and also his medication.
Simon Barrett
7 users commented in " Larry Sinclair Out Of The Slammer "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThank you, Simon, for an honest assessment of Larry’s story.
Link for latest Jeff Rense — Larry Sinclair interview
http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_L_Sinclair_062508.mp3
Larry’s had about all he can take:
http://larrysinclair0926.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/10000-reasons-this-is-over/
See also:
Thursday, June 26, 2008…2:58 pm
NOTE TO MAINSTREAM MEDIA & BLOGGERS: Get over Yourselves and start reporting
by obambi
http://obambi.wordpress.com/2008/06/26/notetomedia/
Whenever there are press conferences at the NPC, inevitably there are interviews, often of more import, afterwards, e.g. The ufo disclosure project. So, obliterating that possibility was an accomplishment for whom?
It certainly opens up questions anew.
You said “Now I am not sure how credible Larry Sinclair is”.
Well, apparently, a slab of granite is more believable : http://nurzratchetz.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/dumber-than-a-rock/
The mainstream media also takes psychics more seriously than Sinclair : http://nurzratchetz.wordpress.com/2008/06/27/as-if-i-needed-more-proof/
He’s been interviewed by reporters at the press conference, has been personally contacted by reporters, has an army of rabid volunteers posting information everywhere they can possibly think of and sending letters to everyone, and yet… The sound of silence coming from the direction of the media, even from those that seemingly delight in blasting Obama, is deafening.
They’ve determined that he has no credibility, and he’s not offering even the smallest bit of proof. In fact, it’s really not possible for him to prove his allegations, is it? How can he prove you did drugs and had gay sex with someone a decade ago?
If he had a blue dress with a semen stain, he’d probably be riding high on the media buzz.
Intead, he’s not offering anything even remotely interesting, so he’s being ignored.
And rightfully so, wouldn’t you agree?
He’s counting, not on a court of law but on the court of public opinion, which is easily swayed by illogical but emotionally charged allegations.
His game is not to prove that he’s telling the truth, but to keep the scam going long enough to fleece his followers (who call themselves “The Family”, reminiscent of Manson’s cult) out of every “donation” he can get before following his tried and true history of evasion and identity change.
There’s no real secret as to how Sinclair came to be arrested. A small group of bloggers who took exception to Sinclair’s meritless lawsuit against other bloggers who said mean things about him have been digging into his past and uncovering all sorts of legal problems Sinclair has had in just about every single state he’s lived in (and that’s quiet a few).
One of those bloggers discovered the Delaware warrant in public records connected with grand jury proceedings being held a few months ago and reported it to the appropriate department in D.C. It was the D.C. police who decided that it was appropriate to hold Sinclair for extradition to Delaware. I have no idea if that was legally the correct decision to make, but there’s no need to invoke conspiracy theories to explain the arrest. No doubt it was a judgment call by someone in the D.C. PD who were acting on a tip off by bloggers who took exception to Larry’s actions.
http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080629/NEWS02/806290324/1007
Facts deflate conspiracy theory
Depending on what blogs you read, Delaware is at the center of a major conspiracy orchestrated to protect presumptive Democratic nominee Barack Obama by silencing a critic.
But like many rumors about a candidate during a presidential election year, this one just isn’t true.
While we are certain this will do little to deter conspiracy theorists, we thought it would be worthwhile to inject some verifiable fact where we find it.
The rumor suggested that former Democratic presidential candidate and Delaware Sen. Joe Biden — who has been named as a possible vice president running mate for Obama — worked with his son, Delaware Attorney General Beau Biden, to have Obama critic Larry Sinclair arrested at the conclusion of a press conference Sinclair held in Washington earlier this month.
Sinclair, who has been making charges about Obama involving sex and drugs, allegedly was taken away at the conclusion of his remarks by U.S. marshals on an outstanding warrant from Delaware.
Some — perhaps only those on Sinclair’s Web site — suggested this was concocted to embarrass Sinclair because there had been no record of a Delaware warrant after a detailed background check in January.
Well, yes, but no.
There was no warrant in January because it was issued in February after an October incident at a New Castle hotel involving Sinclair.
According to the Delaware State Police and Delaware Superior Court records, Sinclair allegedly paid for a three-week stay at the Rodeway Inn with $2,400 in money orders. The hotel manager later found they were counterfeit and called police.
In February — long before Obama became the presumptive nominee — a New Castle County grand jury indicted Sinclair for felony theft and a warrant was issued.
According to state prosecutors, Sinclair was released on $8,000 unsecured bond this week and is due back in court in July for an arraignment.
Larry Sinclair is a criminal, who has spent his life in criminal activity. The place that gave him his polygraph wanted it to be true, they are conservative, but the fact is the fact he failed the polygraph. So I’m suppose to take Mr. Sinclair for his word, when he’s lied pretty much his whole life. Sorry, I don’t think so…. I’m not going to put faith into a criminal verses Obama who has spent his life trying to help others. We in Hawaii know Obama very well, he loves the ladies, and def. is not into men… that is so ludicrous, when I hear the gay accusation I was laughing so hard because it’s such a joke!
Methinks thou protest
too much. Yeah, Obama
was a lad, we get it.
Blacks do not connect
with Obama. His appeal
is predicated on
bonding with whites.
And how exactly is
he black and not white?
If he’s half black and
half white, how does
that make him black?
Is he forced to publicly
identify with the half
of himself that he is
not too familiar or
comfortable with?
Can we stop for a second
and shake ourselves and
ask ourselves if we know
who this guy is and what
he stands for. If you
discovered he was a
complete phony, would you
be surprised.
Why invest so much in
a chimera.
Leave A Reply