…But with continuing bad news for the Clinton campaign, it’ll be EASY to “guess that’s why they call it the blues”!
Last week I reported on the concert that Elton John plans for “BILLARY” Clinton on April 9th.
In that posting, I suggested that the pair not go breaking the law, because foreigners are barred from contributing to candidates.
Well, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has ruled on the issue and has given the pair a “do ahead”. Here’s a copy of the clearance from the FEC for Elton John to have the concert for “BILLARY” Clinton:
Not to worry, though. With the way things are going for the Clinton campaign, we will be able to “guess why they call it the blues”, especially if “the rocket man” sings “good bye” to “BILLARY” Clinton’s campaign, instead of to “Norma Jean”.
KYJurisDoctor can be reached at: http://OsiSpeaks.com
3 users commented in " FEC: Elton John Concert Is OK… "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackInteresting that this web site touts high quality English language analysis and editorial writing, yet puts out such lowly amateurish writing and bias. I mean where is the objectivity in calling HRC Billary? This web site is a joke and a reflection of all the Obamabots out there, many of you which are really not worthy of respect and have no class.
-Andy
State of California
I work in philanthropy and am very familiar with govenment regulations regulating contributions. Contributions fall into three categories: 1) Cash and cash equivalents, 2)Tangible non-cash (“in-kind”) goods, and 3)Intangible non-cash goods/services.
The U.S. government is very clear (and always has been) that regardless of nationality or citizenship, a service performed by an individual is NOT a contribution and cannot be considered that way for tax, election, or other purposes. Singing is a nontangible good (otherwise known as a service) and therefore the basis of the complaint–that Elton John illegally contributed an in-kind service–is moot.
This is yet another example of Obamamaniacs proliferating nonsense based on seemingly viable information in order to raise doubts about the Clinton campaign. After all, these types of attacks are all you can do if your candidate has a half-page resume.
Tony
California
I agree, Andrew, that name calling is useless and lacks intelligence. I just wonder why your post would then go on to use the term “Obamabots”.
Apparently, you do not hold yourself up to the same standard, that you set for others.
Leave A Reply