How ironic is it that MSN would write an article about overexposure of celebrities…about an overexposed celebrity?
     Who exactly is responsible for overexposing these people? THe article all but calls Simpson a talentless hack…but it spends two pages on her. One can only assume that they garner SOME sort of interest from putting these articles up.
    If there is any question about the interest the American public has for these people just look at the sales figures for magazines like People, which really has no point whatsoever except to talk about people because they are famous.
    Until people stop being interested in other people because they are famous there will be no such thing as overexposure.

Be Sociable, Share!