But if we question the hollowcost, we’re evil naze racists.

If this had been a white Gentile, the ADL would’ve been all over it. The Jews think that they can tell this country what to do and then turn around and do what they want. Also, the Jews have a deep-down antipathy to any semblence of Christianity — all except the Christian Zionist that they use for political support of the sacred State of Israel.
http://incogman.wordpress.com/

Please make sure when you quote someone, you quote them correctly. What Ms. Jacobsen said was F TOUCHDOWN Jesus. This was a roast of two celebrities, one of which attended Notre Dame university, where in fact there is a mosaic of Jesus above the entrance to the Stadium. This Mosaic is fondly called Touchdown Jesus because of the pose he is in, looking like he is signalling a touchdown. She made a crude comment about a mosaic. It seems that everywhere i look I read her being quoted as saying F Jesus which is NOT at all what she said or even implied. Make sure you get the facts before you make the judgement.

That dirt horse faced Jewess she needs to be flogged and fired and shipped off to the supposed Holyland

Yes – she should be fired – but she will get away with it…just as people do when it comes to defaming Christians – everyone thinks it’s funny, especially those of Liberal standing – it’s been said if you are offended by what you are watching on T.V. for example, you should turn the channel – FYI – that really leaves no options as Jesus is consistently being defamed on a regular basis in the world in which we live. The 1st Amendment will continue to protect those like Dana Jacobson, even though it is unforgivably offensive to myself others like myself – the 1st Amendment does not protect Jesus – but he can do that himself -“Vengance is mine saith the LORD.”

Wah wah wah. She said it at a private event. Boo f’in hoo. Poor taste, terrible judgment, over-served? Yes, yes and yes. It doesn’t excuse her comments, if in fact they were made. But the whole lot of folks complaining about it need a hobby or a hug or a friend or something. If you’re offended, then be offended (and I’m sorry if its offensive humor to some of you) but don’t act like its the worst thing you’ve ever heard.

I am Catholic and just do not care about this at all. I wasted 10 minutes trying to find out exactly what she said expecting it to be way worse. This is just stupid. This country has got to get over itself, every time a person says something stupid and insensitive the offends a segment of the population they do not need to be fired or even suspended. Imus, Tillman, now Jacobson. At this rate we will have the blandest politically correct junk on TV that it won’t even be worth watching. People need to try to save the righteous indignation for something important like an economy that may collapse, a war we can’t win, or maybe the fact that the dollar is not worth has much a used piece of Kleenex.
PS – Steven – The Jews, as a collective group of people, did not kill Christ. A few conspirators who were jewish and an Italian Emperor killed Christ (Who was a Jew you Dumb A**).

“I am Catholic and just do not care about this at all. I wasted 10 minutes trying to find out exactly what she said expecting it to be way worse.”

What, in your opinion, would be “worse”?

TJ – I can think of any number of things that could be worse. She is entitled to her opinion. This is not a theocracy; it’s a Republic with Democratic Ideals. Which means people should be able to say what ever they want with no qualifiers. I don’t like what she said; I wouldn’t say it simply because I do not agree. Do I personally think a little less of her, yeah of course for using such poor judgment? I think she is kind of bigot, but so are a lot of other people who come from all walks of life, backgrounds, and faiths. I think that many people, some of whom posted on this thread, take these kinds of statements and try to use them as cover so that they can start bashing religions other than Christianity. These people who believe that they have a monopoly on the knowledge of the one true god scare me because there not simply people of faith, they are fundamentalists who think that Christianity needs to be the state sanctioned religion of this country, which is nuts and in direct contrast with what the forefathers intended. So to answer your question Steven’s comments about the Jews killing Christ is far more worse that Jacobson’s Comments about Jesus, but he is entitled to his opinion as well no matter how inaccurate it is.

TJ, You were expecting something far worse than F**k your Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ? I’m offended but, I know that Jesus can take care of himself. He said the world hated him and it would hate his followers. This is very evident in our country today. It seems we kiss up to and try to cater to those who are a part of Islam but, the very Faith this country was founded on and made the U.S. so great we spit on treat it as if its all a big joke. So, Jacobsons comments though they are offensive, are just a normal part of our media and everyday life to the majority in this nation. May God Help Us!

As a Christian, I’m caught between an emotional cavern. I’m not angry at MS. Jacobson or ESPN for their stance. In fact, I’m not even shocked. Yet at the same time I am swayed by the outrage of my fellow Christians brothers and sisters to respond. I can’t even say that I’m outrage. You see unlike most people I do expect the worse out of people (I’m greatly influenced by my theological suppostions that are grounded in the holy scriptures)even though I am not the pessimistic or the cynical type or even distrust most people. I’m not surprised by the double standard in the media (I am african american and some of my people thrive on dual standards but that is another topic)so therefore if anti-christian hatred is expressed by a woman whose people rejected Christ during His first advent and for centuries have perpetuated a strong disdain for Him is expected. With that said I’m not saying that all Jewish people share her sentiments because there are Messianic Jews that are Christ loving and Christ believing and know that He is God. I’ll just pray for the lady and hope God saves her. I do not believe or accept her apology knowing that remorse (if there is any)is often fueled by the inate desire to preserve one’s standing especially if it is due to irreponsible and irreverant conduct. The vodka gave her the courage to say what she really feels, so therefore an apology is ill-fated and in my judgement hypocritcal. What about the network? Should she be fired, well the network’s action or lack there of depending upon which side of the fence one is on speaks volume. What is believed translates to how we behave. The steps that ESPN has taken up to this point is what they believe. They clearly believe what she did only warrants a vacation, uh, “suspension”. Good for them! In conclusion, we should see people for who they really are. As humans we are complex creatures. We have a professional persona, a public persona, and a private persona. The environment determines which one manifests it’s self. Of the three, the private one is the one that most depicts the real person. During Ms. Jacobson’s barrage, we saw the real one. I forgive her.

TJ you might not have read the end of that post so it here is again with some new stuff for you to get upset with. Steven saying that the Jews Killed Jesus is worse, much worse because it is historically inaccurate and is a statement intended to bread hatred and contempt. So TJ that is a lot worse.

I fail to see that, but I’ll give it to you. That’s “any number”?

Trying to draw a parallel between yelling fire in a crowded theater to what Jacobson said is much worse than what she uttered at the Roast as well.

Could you please show me where I drew a parallel between the two? I used the “FIRE” example to demonstrate that your statement “people should be able to say what ever they want with no qualifiers” is nonsense.

What will there excuse for firing her be, because she said something mean about a figure in Christian Doctrine even though she’s well with in her constitution rights to say so.

I’d don’t know where you are from, but here in the U.S., private employers can fire people for no reason. The Constitution doesn’t enter into the discussion.

What don’t you understand about “CONGRESS shall make no law…..”? Last time I looked, the Constitution doesn’t mention ESPN.

In addition, I’m sure that ESPN has behavior clauses written into their contracts.

Nothing has changed in 2000 years…

TJ – I am from the US and I own a LLC. you can’t fire an employee for no reason. If you do you open yourself up to a wrongful termination lawsuit. In the judicial branch i.e. a superior court constituently law does apply. This is where a wrongful termination lawsuit would be litigated. As for the clauses in this person’s contract that is anyone’s guess, but only a fool would sign a contract that would absolve an employer in the event that said employee was terminated due to a speech at a private function. Way once you involve lawyers’ who will cite among other things constitutional law, although, no state or local law may supercede the constitution. But if you fire some one based on the fact that you don’t like their religious views then there could be a lawsuit that will contest that this person’s civil rights have been violated. It may seem complex for you but try to connect the dots. What you’re advocating would imply that it is okay to fire a person who voices their differing religious views from your own. I don’t think this is what you are intending to do TJ, because only a bigot much larger then Jacobson would assert this as being a good idea.

Of Course people get fired for no good reason every day, but they can’t afford a lawyer I am sure she does not have that problem. Why do you think Imus was able to sue CBS, breach of contract. CBS could not challenge is constitutional right to say what he said as a defense for his termination, that’s why they settled out of court. This would be the same type of situation should it come to that.

I am from the US and I own a LLC. you can’t fire an employee for no reason. If you do you open yourself up to a wrongful termination lawsuit.

Uh, so am I. And you might want to look up “at will” employment. Now, this woman obviously has a contract, but I know for a fact that ESPN employees have terms in their contracts that allow them to be terminated for anything that may damage the reputation of the company. As a matter of fact, most companies have those clauses. I’m not sure where you get the idea that you can’t fire your employees, but you can, as long as you don’t violate civil rights statutes, wistleblower laws, or issues like that. First amendment doesn’t apply.

I realize you won’t believe me, so I did a quick look a came up with this:

PUBLIC LAW RESEARCH INSTITUTE
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HASTINGS COLLEGE OF THE LAW

REPORT
JURY VERDICTS IN WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASES
by David J. Jung, Professor of Law and Director, Public Law Research Institute, October 29, 1997

This report was prepared by the Public Law Research Institute at Hastings College of the Law. It does not represent the views or policies of Hastings College of the Law, its Board of Directors or its faculty.

Jury Verdicts in Wrongful Termination Cases

Introduction

Methodology

The Types of Wrongful Termination

The Facts of Wrongful Termination, Revisited
A. How many lawsuits?
B. How many verdicts?
Figure 1: Wrongful Termination Verdicts, 1992-1996
Figure 2: Type of Case, 1992-1996
C. Who wins?
Table One: Wrongful Termination Verdicts, 1992-1996
D. How much?
Table Two: Average and Median Verdicts, 1992-1996

1. Contract cases
2. Public policy cases: retaliation and discrimination
3. Independent torts
Table Three: Verdicts in Contract, Retaliation, Discrimination, and Independent Tort Cases, 1992-1996
Table Four: Rates of Success, 1992-1996

Wrongful Termination Elsewhere
A. Contract cases in Texas
B. Retaliation cases in Texas
C. Discrimination cases in Texas

Implications for Pending Legislation

Conclusion

JURY VERDICTS IN WRONGFUL TERMINATION CASES

by David J. Jung1

I. Introduction
At the request of the Senate Office of Research, the Public Law Research Institute has conducted a study of jury verdicts in California wrongful termination cases from 1992 to 1996. “Wrongful termination” cases are lawsuits in which an employee seeks damages from his employer for firing him without cause. Recently, concerns about the economic burden wrongful termination suits impose on California employers have led to proposals for legislative reform. To evaluate the need for and possible effects of these reforms, this study reviews a sample of 639 jury verdicts in California wrongful termination cases over the last five years. For purposes of comparison, the study also examines 396 verdicts in Texas wrongful termination cases.

Wrongful termination lawsuits first became controversial in the late 1980’s, because a series of California court of appeals decisions had permitted some employees to recover damages for emotional distress and punitive damages from employers who fired them in bad faith. Verdicts in some wrongful termination cases reached into the millions of dollars; credible estimates of average verdicts ranged from $452,5702 to $646,855.3

These developments sparked a number of studies, including one by the RAND Institute for Civil Justice, focusing on the costs of these new liability rules for employers.4 The RAND study suggested that the direct legal costs of wrongful termination were quite small, particularly per employee. The indirect costs of changing personnel and employment practices, however, could be significant, and the RAND study argued that the effects of these costs could be seen in the economies of states with liberal rules. While the RAND study acknowledged that the kind of job security the developing law of wrongful termination provided generated benefits as well as costs, the costs of wrongful termination attracted the public’s and the media’s attention.

The indirect costs the RAND study identified had largely to do with personnel and employment practices employers might adopt under the perceived threat of large compensatory and punitive damage awards. Shortly after the RAND study was published, however, the California Supreme court changed the ground rules for damages in wrongful termination cases. In Foley v. Interactive Data Corporation5 the Court reaffirmed the rule of at-will employment in California. That is, employers may fire an employee for any reason or no reason at all, unless the employer has expressly or implicitly agreed only to fire the employee for cause. If an employer has agreed only to fire for cause, wrongfully terminated employees may recover damages for the economic loss — lost wages, and the like — caused by their dismissal. Punitive damages and damages for emotional distress cannot be recovered.

On the other hand, while employers are free to fire at-will employees for any reason or no reason, some “bad” reasons can result in liability. If firing the employee violates a fundamental, public policy, or if the employer negligently or intentionally causes the employee some kind of personal injury, the employer may be liable for damages for emotional distress or punitive damages, in addition to being liable for the employee’s economic losses.

Thus, since the RAND study, the ground rules for wrongful termination have changed. The kind of damage awards the RAND study was concerned with are now limited to cases in which the employer violates a fundamental public policy by firing the employee, or commits some independent wrong, like defamation, or assault. Once it became clear that employers would not be liable for punitive damages simply because they lacked good cause to terminate an employee, the controversy over wrongful termination seemed to abate.6

Recently, however, the controversy has been renewed. Employers have expressed concern over “surging”7 and unpredictable verdicts that create a disincentive to hiring, and Governor Wilson has responded by including wrongful termination in his package of tort reform proposals.8 Legislation that would restrict recoveries in wrongful termination cases has been introduced in both the Senate9 and the Assembly.10

II. Methodology
Tdatabases. Searches his study is based on reports of jury verdicts found in Lexis®-Nexis®’s jury verdicts were run in the LexisCAJURY combines reports ®-Nexis® ALLVER, CAJURY and TXJURY databases. from several local jury reporters, including Jury Verdicts Weekly, Verdictum Juris Press, Inc., O’Brien’s Evaluator and Tri-Service. TXJURY combines reports from North Texas Reports and Soele’s Trial Reporter. The ALLVER database combines these local jury reports with two national reporters, Jury Verdicts Research, and Confidential Report for Attorneys.

Jury verdict reporters typically rely for their data on reports attorneys file voluntarily when a case is concluded. Because jury verdict reporters rely on self-reporting, they are not comprehensive, and it is always possible that certain categories of cases or cases from certain cities and counties are over represented. Yet, there seems to be a consensus among researchers that local jury verdict reporters are a useful source of information about the civil justice system.11

All cases in which the injury complained of was identified as “wrongful termination” were examined. Cases described as involving “retaliatory discharge,” “employment discrimination” and “breach of employment contract” were also examined. Cases involving other adverse, employment decisions, such as failures to hire or promote, were not included. A complete description of the search terms used can be obtained by contacting the Public Law Research Institute.

III. The Types of Wrongful Termination
Some background information about the law of wrongful termination is necessary in order to understand the study’s results. According to the California Labor Code, unless an employee is hired for a specific term, the employee is an “at-will” employee, and can be fired for any reason or no reason at all.12 He cannot be fired, however, for a bad reason, like discrimination, and he cannot be fired in a way that violates his right to be free from personal injury.

Thus, an employee who wishes to sue for wrongful termination must show either,

1) that his employment contract, either expressly or implicitly, included a promise that he would not be fired without cause (contract cases); or,

2) that his employer fired him for a reason that violates a fundamental policy expressed in California’s statutes or constitution (public policy cases), including laws against unlawful discrimination (discrimination cases), or

3) that the employer committed a tort, like defamation, invasion of privacy, or intentional infliction of emotional distress (independent tort cases).

This forum says it all. Jews attack Christianity constantly, incessantly without fear. Christian sheep roll over and defend their ATTACKERS. You sheep are such pathetic cowards you can’t even stand up to defend your faith, much less your race. You deserve to be destroyed, just as is happening.

Uhh, yea.

I love your name.

“monkey brain”? I that an honorary title?

Her last name is Jacobson. She is a jew. This is what Jews do. This is what Jews think is funny.

This is why your television denigrates Jesus for the past 20 years. This is who runs the media, and works in the media, for the most part.

Welcome to reality, otherwise known as “that of which we dare not speak”.

wow – we all got a sociopath plotting WWIII and all this over some tart mumbling obscenities over a mythological figure. Maybe we deserve the fate of a Clinton/McCain i.e. the never-ending war machine.

Thank your/her God you did not trample on Druids – then I would take umbrage.

Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

“Religions are all alike – founded upon fables and mythologies.” – Thomas Jefferson

In the realm of the big three, Jews, Christians and Muslims, only one is immune from attack. Gee,I wonder who that would be???

Put in front of the firing squad that Jewish whore, with all her sympathizers.

Who cares guy’s “touchdown jesus” IS A STATUE on ND’s campus
and we all know that to be an american you must love ND, right
F#$% touchdown jesus and ND

The story of Jesus is the greatest lie every told. Historians of the time NEVER wrote about a man named Jesus born of Mary who perfromed miracles etc. It was a Roman Cathlic Political story used to controll the masses.
It is still being used today for the purpose of control.

God and Godesss is within us all. Once this is realized – There is no stopping the Human Race from becoming the Gods they already are…

This jewish sow should apologise to Catholics and Notre Dame fans and school attendees. Make a snide comment today about Blacks or jews and your average person could loose their job but this pig “Oh, it was just a mistake.” and gets away with it?! What is wrong with this nation?!?!

IT’S ALL DOUBLE STANDARD!! IF A BLACK PERSON SAY RACIAL ABOUT WHITES
ON TV OR STAND UP COMIC THAT IS OK. BUT A WHITE PERSON SAY ANYTHING
NEGATIVE ABOUT BLACKS, THE PERSON BECOMES A RACIST. IF ANYBODY SAY
ANYTHING ABOUT THE JEWS, THE PERSON IS A RACIST. IF ANYBODY WOULD
SAY ANYTHING NEGATIVE ABOUT THE MUSLIM FAITH…HE IS MARKED FOR DEATH!!
WITH RESPECT TO THE MEMORIES OF THE VICTIM OF THE NAZI CONSENTRATION
CAMP, THERE ARE ALSO OTHER RACE/PEOPLE WHO LOST MILLIONS OF CIVILIANS
DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR FROM STARVATION, INPRISONMENT AND SLAVE LABOR.
CHECK YOUR HISTORY. BY THE WAY, THERE ARE CHRISTIANS CHURCHES IN U.S. SENDS
MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN SUPPORT OF ISRAEL!!
DOUBLE STANDARD AND PLAIN AND PURE HIPOCRISY!!!!

Grow up people. Was she at work? No. Was she speakin for anyone? No. Was she expressing her own opinion and/or making a joke in poor taste? Yes. Was it offensive to some? Yes. Was it offensive to non-Christians? Probably not. Has she a right to her opinion? Yes. Is it any of your business? No.

Get over it.

Fu*k Jesus, fu*k Mohammed, fu*k Moses and fu*k Kali.

Who cares?

ps. Neither Christians nor Muslims are a race… it’s hard to be racist towards a group of people who don’t share a race.

“it’s not like she said f**k Allah or Jesse Jackson”. Why use this as an example???!!!
The real outrage would be if she had said f**k the Holocaust! Only then, would all hell break loose, and she would be “crucified” and villified as a “self hating Jew”.

As a Christian, the comment itself does not bother me as much as the double standard that exists. People are free to mock my religious beliefs and I shouldn’t even get offended. But, try mocking any element of the Jewish faith and see what happens to you. And, despite what others may say, you are free to bash Islam all you want in this country. Muslims are called towel-heads (and much worse) by media figures and no one has lost their job over that.

As for the “jews killed Christ” being much worse — no, it isn’t. And it isn’t inaccurate, either. The jewish religious leaders were threatened by Him — and his radical ideas. Jesus wasn’t trying to overthrow the Romans or lead them to revolt against Rome. He was trying to overthrow the corruption that he saw in the Jewish community at the time. But, even Christ said, “Father, forgive them for they know not what they do”. If Christ forgave the Jews for whatever part they played, why should Christians today place blame on Jews for His death? I certainly don’t. I realize there are some who do — but there are also Christian snake handlers and I don’t think bible encourages us to prove our faith through handling poisonous snakes. Just because some people who PROFESS to have a certain faith adopt crazy ideas doesn’t mean that the true faith endorses such craziness.

And the whole issue of jewishness as race or religion is baffling to me. If Judaism accepts converts (which it does), the jews can’t really be defined as a separate race. Especially since you have major differences genetically between the Sephardic and Ashkenazi jews. So, I can’t see how the jews can be defined as a race.

In a world where questioning any part of the Holocaust story (even if you do not deny that it happened) can land you in prison in several nations, I think we need to be open and honest about this double standard. One group should not get a pass simply because they were the victims of a historical horror. Either we can criticize and mock everyone or we have to stifle our speech with political correctness for every group. Personally, I’m for the former.

You are free to mock me as you will.

It is clear she is an Anti-Christian. BTW, this (i.e. the denigration of different races, religions, and creeds) seems to be a pattern of behavior for ESPN anchors.

I am a convert to Islam, so I am neither christian nor jew, but as a Muslim I accept *all* the Prophets of God, without exception (from Adam through to Abraham, Moses, Jesus and of course, Muhammad, the final Prophet to Humankind).

And even though rightwing “Christian” fundmamentalists have openly declared war on my religion spreading filth and lies about it to suit Ziomism’s greater agenda, I am more concerned with being Truthful and honest as our Religion teaches us to be:

I declare without doubt, or hesitation, that the Christian religion is, and has been, under heavy attack for at least the last 30 years or so by America’s Media Apparatus. It is mocked and derided at least on a monthly basis… And documentaries attempting to distort and debase the beautiful character of Jesus are almost a “dime a dozen”, as they say.

And whilst Jewish attacks on Islam are prevalent and obvious (in fact, it’s almost P.C now), the attacks on Christianity have been more subtle… or if they become obvious, they are quickly swept under the rug and we are made to “forget” these attacks ever occurred…

And what is the end goal?

Well, who largely controls the Media (especially in the U.S)?

Why, Jews of course (I would say people of the Jewish “Faith”, but most Jews these days seem to be “Atheists”, not “theists”.)

And who attempted to murder Jesus 2000 years ago? (Muslims do not believe Jesus was killed, but that he was taken bodily up into Heaven: we sincerely believe that God loved him too much to have him murdered at the hands of tyrants & vile sinners.)

And who is being targeted and persecuted in the Holy Land at the hands of these same Jews? Muslims AND Christians of course!

So, to whose benefit is it that Muslims and Christians have their religions denigrated and put-down in America’s media?

And just WHO is fighting Israel’s wars for her?

I declare that there is only *One* God (Our Creator and Sustainer who is SEPARATE from the Creation), and I declare that Muhammad is His final Prophet and Messenger (In a long tradition of Prophets from Adam through to Moses and Jesus).

We are Spiritual Beings by Nature.

There is SOME Spirituality in Religion.
but
There is NO Religion in Spirituality.

Do the 2000 year old rituals if you wish.
Notice we are BEINGS not DOINGS.

We are all one in the same
and
ALL THAT IS…is WITHIN US ALL

PEACE

Who cares, people are killing each other over which invisible man to worship.

Props to her, women should be allowed to drink and be as foul as men, thats what equal rights is all about.

Your throw away trash comment needs rebutting;

“After all, we should be used to the double standard that christians are OK to attack, I suppose.”

This Dana-trash is a christian. A good one or a bad one is irrelevant. The fact is she has sworn your ‘god’ and christians don’t care (much).

If she were muslim the first point is she wouldn’t say what she said. Not ever. Not even the bad ones among us.

You see the one holy unseen God of all is Allaah in Islam, God the Father in old christianity and G*D in Judaism, is one & the same. If someone swore Allah they’d be pushing up daisies by now. If someone swore G*D in the old days they’d be pushing up daisies now. If someone swore God the Father in days gone by, they’d be pushing up daisies now.

What she said is what’s in all your hearts. Your society is a reflection of that. Your religious celebrations are just an excuse for sex drugs and rock & roll. Where as islamic religious occasions are religious congrgational prayers to the goD of Adam, Noah, Moses, David, Jesus, & Muhammad.

What she said is on all your lips and in all your hearts, save a few.

Robert Says:
January 24th, 2008 at 12:52 pm

In the realm of the big three, Jews, Christians and Muslims, only one is immune from attack. Gee, I wonder who that would be???

I think this is case in most “Western” countries; some even put you behind bars for the mere crime of questioning.

Cyber_Cohen.

Who cares what she said? All drunks are idiots…..and say idiotic things when drunk…

As a Muslim I am shocked that this lady would be so disrespectful to Jesus. Although I do not believe Jesus to be the son of God, he should be respected.

Of course, this seems like too much to ask nowadays…

“It seems Jacobson was so drunk that her
“comedy routine” included the always funny
“f**k Jesus””

Always funny?

Thanks for telling us
Christians and Muslims
who revere Christ
where you are coming
from.

Now we know what not to buy
from you creeps.

It’s always the same people saying rotten things about Jesus. I’ll give you a hint… it isn’t Muslims, Christians or buddhists defaming Christ.

Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact the message was delivered by a Jew, is being defended by Jews, and was planned as a promotion of a Jewish radio talk show host. It sure looks like Christian hate to me.

Ernie Says:
January 25th, 2008 at 5:28 pm
“It seems Jacobson was so drunk that her
“comedy routine” included the always funny
“f**k Jesus””

Always funny?

Editorial irony is lost on Ernie who did not read the rest of the column, apparently.

Who cares what she said at a ROAST…..where you are supposed to make off color jokes? Can no one take a joke about our lord and savior? Notre Dame blows and everyone knows it. I’m catholic and I can take a joke. This was a drunken rant that went a little too far and was not very funny, so what, its not offensive. Take it with a grain of salt. At least she’s not serious like some poster on this site who is a rabid anti-jewtastic!

I’m catholic and I can take a joke

Mark D – I’m Catholic and I can take a joke too.

I am Roman Catholic that is. not just “catholic” as so many sectarian wannabes who don’t read history and know zip about the Faith use the word as though they can erase 15 centuries and start the Church in 1517 with Martin Luther.

Mark – I bet you went to catechism class, presided over by a Director of Religious Education who thinks the Church started in 1962 with Vatican II.

After Vatican II a lot of Catholic educators decided that blasphemy, along with a lot of other malefactions against the 10 Commandments. didn’t exist any more.

Like that title card at the beginning of the movie “Dogma” that told Catholics that they should sit back and take all the lies, misrepresentations and shit thrown at Catholic teaching and if you don’t, you just have no sense of humor.

Funny – when people make fun of Enviromentalist jerks and Global warming gurus the same people curse and scream that I and people like me are ruining the planet.

Wake up Mark – blasphemy is a sin. There are such things. They hurt you much more than God because the numb your conscience to truth and the majesty of the All-seeing, Almighty God.

Ya poor slob. I really pity you.

when are christians going to wake up? hello? it is not anti semitic to put the spot light on these jews and expose them once and for all!, jesus doesnt want us to be silent and turn our backs on him, christians need to take a stand! now!speak up! we cant keep our eyes closed to all this censorship of jesus and being a christian and all the jews double standards, they are killing christianity slow and gradually! havent you noticed its not called merry christmas anymore? its called happy holiday now! thank the anti christian jews!

IT was a ROAST! Get over it, Dana keep up the good work.

Another far left fat entitled Jew that needs to go back to Michigan and read the Koran– see if that will get her riled up– ESPN is a Jew company save the Jewess-Ron Franklin said nothing that the looser has not heard before- just look at her- can you imagine waking up with her after sex and she screams rape!What a worthless individual-my yellow lab and she is a female -when she takes a dump on her worst days she is heaven above and God nows better than that b***h on her best day-fire the looser ESPN sucks!