Send As SMS
<-- HitTail.com code -->

Blogger News Network

BNN provides English-language US and world news, analysis and opinion from all over the Internet. We strive for high standards, ethical behavior, and the presentation of multiple responsible points of view.



Visiting our advertisers directly supports this site. Thanks!


Get More Traffic For Your Blog!

Blog Explosion brings hundreds of interested visitors to your blog - without costing you a cent.

BNN News Archive Page
       Friday, September 22, 2006

Imagine Your Byline Here - Click Here To Write For BNN




Reporters to serve time for refusing to name sources

According to this story, some San Francisco Chronicle reporters are to be jailed for refusing to name sources for a Barry Bonds steroids story.Though I'm a professional journalist myself, and was indoctrinated at J-school to oppose this type of thing, I think it's fundamentally important that journalists not be given special treatment in court.

The reason for this is that there is no legal definition for "journalist," and if the First Amendment is to mean anything, there can't be one.That means that the law -- that courts can subpoena information that's pertinent to a case -- applies to journalists as it applies to everyday people.

If we're going to give journalists rights that others don't have, we need to license them so those rights aren't abused. Otherwise, criminals and their acquaintances could get out of testifying by writing about their cases.

Robert VerBruggen blogs at http://robertsrationale.blogspot.com.



Blogger News Network is advertiser-supported, and your visits to our advertisers help BNN to meet its expenses. Help keep us afloat!

posted by Robert VerBruggen at 5:14 PM  

2 Comments:

thedonnybrook said...

On the whole, federal law on this issue is not on the side of the reporters. Generally speaking, privileges are an evidentiary issue to deal with admissibility. For the non-legal types, if a privilege exists, any testimony will be disregarded by the court to protect the interests the privilege protects. Under federal law, current privileges include doctor-patient, psyhotherapist-patient (though to a limited degree), and attorney-client. State law is very different on this issue. Many states have laws called sheild laws that provide extra protection for the press. However, this case is in federal court, and these writers will look forward to a Judith Milller-like stay in a federal prison.

6:03 PM  
Robert VerBruggen said...

This is a very good point, and thanks for bringing up the difference between federal and state laws (probably should have mentioned it in my original post). Also I'd like to point out that attorneys, doctors and psychotherapists are all licensed.

8:32 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Add this story to Digg     Reddit     Newsvine     Del.icio.us     Ma.gnolia     Spurl

      

Sign up for Blog Soldiers and get 50 free credits!

Subscribe to BNN and get a daily bulletin of all our news postings.
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Interested in writing for BNN? Want information on our news service?

Contact The Editor
Writing for BNN
BNN Editorial Policies