BNN provides English-language US and world news, analysis and opinion from all over the Internet. We strive for high standards, ethical behavior, and the presentation of multiple responsible points of view.
|
Get More Traffic For Your Blog! Blog Explosion brings hundreds of interested visitors to your blog - without costing you a cent. BNN News Archive Page |
       |
Thursday, May 04, 2006
States Challenge to Australian Work Choices Act Begins The court challenge against the Australian federal government's Work Choices legislation has begun in Canberra today. The challenge was initiated by the governments of New South Wales, Western Australia, South Australia, Queensland and Victoria and joined by theAustralian Workers' Union and Unions NSW. The states claim that the legislation, passed by parliament in December last year is unconstitutional. The federal government is using the corporations powers of the constitution, which the states say was never intended to be used for industrial arbitration. Today, the court heard New South Wales' challenge to the laws. Solicitor-general of NSW, Michael Sexton, SC, said that the legislation would have been considered unconstitutional since federation over 100 years ago. He questioned whether or not the authors of Australia's constitution intended for the corporations provisions to extend to employees. "What we do say is that this legislation would have been considered beyond a commonwealth power for most of the last century" he told the court. Another lawyer for New South Wales, Bret Walker, SC, said states had been given the power of industrial relations, not the commonwealth government. Some of the submissions made by New South Wales were attacked by Justice Haynes, the judge presiding over the case as being sloppy and ill-prepared. Justice Haynes said that the definitions in the constitution need to be read in context of the 1890s, which were boom and bust times for corporations in Australia. He said that today, corporations are different to in the past. Justice Haynes said that the authors would have been aware that there could be changes in the way the constitution was interpreted. The premier of Queensland, Peter Beattie is concerned that if the states lose their case that the powers between the states and commonwealth would need to revised. "We will need a constitutional convention to reshape the powers between the states and the Commonwealth" he said. Related Wikinews"Australian States to launch high court battle against IR reforms". Wikinews, December 22, 2006 Sources
This article originally appeared at WikiNews. Blogger News Network is advertiser-supported, and your visits to our advertisers help BNN to meet its expenses. Help keep us afloat! posted by Robert at 1:22 PM |
       |
Subscribe to BNN and get a daily bulletin of all our news postings. Interested in writing for BNN? Want information on our news service? Contact The Editor Writing for BNN BNN Editorial Policies Previous Posts
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home