BNN provides English-language US and world news, analysis and opinion from all over the Internet. We strive for high standards, ethical behavior, and the presentation of multiple responsible points of view.
|
Get More Traffic For Your Blog! Blog Explosion brings hundreds of interested visitors to your blog - without costing you a cent. BNN News Archive Page |
       |
Monday, February 20, 2006
Irving Sentenced to Three Years "History is like a constantly changing tree."British Third Reich historian David Irving was arrested November 11 in the southern Austrian province of Styria on a warrant issued in 1989 for two public speeches he had given in which he insisted that the Nazis were not responsible for the deaths of millions of Jews and that there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz. He was charged under a federal law that makes it a crime to publicly diminish, deny or justify the Holocaust."I don't see any reason to be tasteful about Auschwitz. It's baloney, it's a legend. Once we admit the fact that it was a brutal slave labour camp and large numbers of people did die, as large numbers of innocent people died elsewhere in the war, why believe the rest of the baloney?"Irving has had numerous run-ins with the law over the years. In 1992, a judge in Germany fined him the equivalent of $6,000US for publicly insisting the Nazi gas chambers at Auschwitz were a hoax. When American Holocaust historian Deborah Lipstadt counted Irving among those who deny the Holocaust, Irving sued for libel. Although Irving brought suit in Britain, where the burden of proof is on the defendant rather than the plaintiff, Irving lost in the highly publicized 2000 trial. The presiding judge in that case, Charles Gray, wrote that Irving was "an active Holocaust denier ... anti-Semitic and racist." Following his November arrest, Irving first tried to win his provisional release on $24,000 bail, but a Vienna court refused, saying it considered him a flight risk. Within two weeks of his arrest, he asserted through his lawyer that he had come to acknowledge the existence of Nazi-era gas chambers. Before the trial began, Irving told reporters he now acknowledges that the Nazis systematically slaughtered Jews during World War II.Irving explained his change of heart by observing that "history is like a constantly changing tree." Today, Irving arrived in court carrying a copy of one of his most controversial books -- "Hitler's War" -- which challenges the extent of the Holocaust. Facing up to ten years in prison if convicted, Irving entered a guilty plea and told the court "I made a mistake when I said there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz." The author of more than 30 books, Irving has previously claimed that Adolf Hitler knew little (if anything) about the Holocaust until October of 1943, and he has been quoted as saying there was "not one shred of evidence" the Nazis carried out their "Final Solution" to exterminate the Jewish population on such a massive scale. He not only denied the Nazi execution of 6 million Jews, he contended that most of those who died at concentration camps such as Auschwitz succumbed to diseases such as typhus rather than execution, and insisted that there were no gas chambers. Despite his sudden enlightenment, the court sentenced Irving to three years in prison. He has three days in which to enter an appeal. Irving views himself as a champion of what he calls "Real History." He blames a vast (largely Jewish) conspiracy of "the traditional enemies of free speech" for losing book contracts and income and now sees his works published free online on his own website. From the Wiki entry on David Irving, re: "The Destruction of Dresden" his first book, published in 1963. In the book, Irving examined the Allied bombing of Dresden in February 1945. By the 1960s, a debate about the morality of the carpet bombing of German cities and civilian population had already begun, especially in the United Kingdom. There was consequently considerable interest in Irving's book, which was illustrated with graphic pictures. The book subsequently became an international bestseller. In the first edition of the book, Irving's estimates for deaths in Dresden were between 100,000 and 250,000 - nearly an order of magnitude higher than previous numbers. These figures became authoritative and widely accepted in many standard references and encyclopedias. Over the next three decades, later editions of the book gradually modified that figure downwards to a range of 50,000 to 100,000. Forty years later, during the hearing of Irving's libel suit against Deborah Lipstadt, these figures were publicly discredited. Today, the Dresden bombing casualty figures are estimated as most likely in the range of 25,000 to 35,000 dead, and probably toward the lower end of that range.re: "Hitler's War" the first of his two-part biography on Adolf Hitler: Irving tried to describe the war from "Hitler's point of view." He portrayed Hitler as a rational, intelligent politician, whose only goal was to increase Germany's prosperity and influence on the continent. For instance, Irving's book faulted the Allied leaders, most notably Winston Churchill, for the eventual escalation of war. Where Irving's path to infamy truly began, however, was his controversial claim that Hitler had no knowledge of the Holocaust. While not denying its occurrence, Irving claimed that Heinrich Himmler and his deputy Reinhard Heydrich were its originators and architects.Kate blogs at The Original Musings. Sources: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185384,00.html http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/i/irving-david/ http://www.google.com/search... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4449948.stm Blogger News Network is advertiser-supported, and your visits to our advertisers help BNN to meet its expenses. Help keep us afloat! posted by Kate at 3:17 PM |
       |
Subscribe to BNN and get a daily bulletin of all our news postings. Interested in writing for BNN? Want information on our news service? Contact The Editor Writing for BNN BNN Editorial Policies Previous Posts
|
1 Comments:
So what should we do with Mitsubishi (and their friends at Ford) who deny the Japanese invaded China during WWII?
Great article...
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home