Send As SMS
<-- HitTail.com code -->

Blogger News Network

BNN provides English-language US and world news, analysis and opinion from all over the Internet. We strive for high standards, ethical behavior, and the presentation of multiple responsible points of view.



Visiting our advertisers directly supports this site. Thanks!


Get More Traffic For Your Blog!

Blog Explosion brings hundreds of interested visitors to your blog - without costing you a cent.

BNN News Archive Page
       Sunday, January 22, 2006

Imagine Your Byline Here - Click Here To Write For BNN




A Military Option for Iran?

I recently mentioned that I had supported Israel's preemptive strike against Iraq's nuclear plant in the making in 1981. However, let us be very clear about the contrasts between that situation and what we are facing with Iran now. The Iraq strike by Israel was carefully calculated. It was put into effect prior to start up of the plant so that there was no risk of nuclear contamination. It was targeted on a Sunday when no personnel were expected to be there so that no lives were taken. And it only required hitting a single site. Also Hussein had a track record for aggressive attacks on neighboring states (the war on Iran that he had launched the year before):

http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm


Now we are facing an entirely different picture per the news reports today. We would have to hit about 1,000 sites over a protracted period. Presumably these operating plants would both risk nuclear contamination and the strikes would cause numerous killings and woundings. Israel says that it does not have the military resources to carry out such an operation. Iran both has strong potential supporters (Russia, China, neighboring states) and a ground for resentment towards the two major powers, the U.S. and Britain, that replaced the reform government of Mossadeq in 1953 with the brutal regime of the Shah -- they have a moral edge on us from the past:

http://www.iranonline.com/newsroom/Archive/Mossadeq/


In addition to the above Iran is in a position to punish attackers with a redirection of oil to friends and/or an increase in prices along with another discontented critic of the U.S., Hugo Chavez. Thus, on pragmatic grounds a military attack on Iran is also a loser.

And so history catches up with nations that have abused others.
--
"A war is just if there is no alternative, and the resort
to arms is legitimate if they represent your last hope." (Livy)
--
Ed Kent 718-951-5324 (voice mail only) [blind copies]
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PeaceEfforts
http://BlogByEdKent.blogspot.com/
http://www.bloggernews.net



Blogger News Network is advertiser-supported, and your visits to our advertisers help BNN to meet its expenses. Help keep us afloat!

posted by Ed Kent at 7:06 AM  

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Add this story to Digg     Reddit     Newsvine     Del.icio.us     Ma.gnolia     Spurl

      

Sign up for Blog Soldiers and get 50 free credits!

Subscribe to BNN and get a daily bulletin of all our news postings.
Enter your Email


Powered by FeedBlitz

Interested in writing for BNN? Want information on our news service?

Contact The Editor
Writing for BNN
BNN Editorial Policies