During a conference call with reporters and bloggers today, Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards called on the Congress to stand up to President Bush and bring the Iraq war to a conclusion. Along with this, Edwards is trying to start a grassroots effort to pressure Congress by using the slogan, “No timetable, No funding. No excuses.”
“President Bush wants everyone to keep playing the Beltway game. But this isn’t a game - lives are at stake. Young men and women are dying almost every day and Iraq is descending further into civil war. It’s time to end the game - we can’t wait. Congress must tell the president something very simple: No timetable, no funding. No excuses. I’m calling on Congress to refrain from bickering about benchmarks and stop playing the Beltway game. Congress must stand up to the president’s policy, reject the incremental triangulation we see inside Washington, and solve the problem in Iraq,” Edwards said.
Edwards said that if President Bush vetoes a bill that contains a timetable for troop withdrawal, Congress ought to send it back to him again and again. He also pointed out that people like Gen. Peter Pace and Sen. John Warner have moved closer to his position of immediately withdrawing 40,000-50,000 troops, and getting the rest out of Iraq by next year. Edwards also wants Gen. Petraeus to testify in front of Congress about what progress our military policy has made in Iraq towards finding a political solution.
“Instead of focusing on this benchmark or that benchmark and whether there’s progress, no progress, or partial progress, what should be asked is the basic question of whether there’s been any serious moves to a political solution. Because everyone recognizes there cannot be stability and peace in Iraq unless some comprehensive political solution is reached,” Edwards said. It would appear from Edwards’s comments he too believes that the Democratic Congress has consistently caved to President Bush on the issue of Iraq.
I doubt that his grassroots campaign to pressure Congress to stand up to President Bush will work, but by this point it doesn’t hurt to try. It is nice to see a candidate echo the disappointment of rank and file Democrats, in not so much the whole Congress, but the Senate which has acted in a completely spineless manner when it comes to the war.
Other than Dennis Kucinich, no other Democratic candidate has as consistently spoken out about this war. Speaking of Kucinich, major props should go to him for going all over the country and passionately campaigning against the Iraq war. It is looking more and more like Edwards won’t win the Democratic nomination, but he and Kucinich have each taken up the mantle of the traditional Democrat, and I think they both deserve credit for trying to remind people what the Democratic Party used to stand for.
Jason Easley is the editor of the Politics Zone at www.411mania.com/politics His column The Political Universe appears on 411 every Tuesday and Friday.
















5 users commented in " Edwards launches new campaign to pressure Congress on Iraq "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackActually, it is only Mr. Dennis Kucinich who was against this war in the 1st place before it even started. I feel that Mr. Edwards is just playing politics –telling rhetorics but his actions do NOT match his words. Just take a look at Mr. Edwards’ voting record as well as the other Democratic candidates as well. In previous news, actually Mr. Edwards support Pres. Bush’s idea or plan to go to war in Iran… Let the truth be known. Knowyourdemocrats.com! Thank you.
When have the Democrats ever had anything but derision and hate for our military? So we are supposed to believe that John Edwards has suddenly changed? I dont think so. This is a platform for his White House ambitions and nothing more. Rico from ThatPoliticalBlog.com
I think that bopth of you bring up very good points, but there is one key difference, Edwards gets more mainstream media attention in a day than Dennis gets in a month. We are talking about politics here, not who said it first. I think it is more important that this type of message be said, by somebody who actually gets attention than a candidate that the media does not listen to. I don’t support either candidate, but I am just glad that someone is talking about it.
Rico J. Halo asked:
When have the Democrats ever had anything but derision and hate for our military?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The “Democrats” have never hated the American military. On the contrary, most Democrats I know (and EVERY member of MY party [the GREEN Party]) object very strongly to its MIS-use! There’s nothing ‘patriotic’ about sending our young men and women to die in a trumped-up war whose ONLY purpose is to assure multi-national corporations (who have NO allegiance to the U.S.A.) that they can expand their markets and resources for the Almighty Dollar. That’s why we call it ‘imperialism’!
You might have noticed that Halliburton, Bechtel, KBR and others have profited obscenely from this latest misadventure in Iraq. Take off the blinders…and REALLY support the troops.
Jason Easley writes:
…I think it is more important that this type of message be said, by somebody who actually gets attention than a candidate that the media does not listen to…
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I’ve got an even better idea…how about raising hell with the media and with the DNC apparatchiks for virtually shutting Dennis Kucinich and his message OUT of the discussion? There’s a lot more to Dennis Kucinich than there is to the hemmers and hawers and rank opportunists opposing him on this and other issues that deserve media coverage. Kucinich CAN win…IF we vote for him…instead of meekly accepting the media’s pronouncements on whom we must take ’seriously’.
Why settle for less than the best? “Lesser Evil-ism” is self-defeating.
Leave A Reply