<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody asked me, but&#8230; (August 2007)</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bryit</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83931</link>
		<dc:creator>bryit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 01:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83931</guid>
		<description>9/11 conspiracy theorists are such nuts.  there's no evidence of an inside job. and hate to break to all you nuts,  u seem to ignore this, all the bodies  at the pentagon and flight 93 were identified, including the terrorists.  which dismisses that anything else crashed in pennsylvania, or crashed into the pentagon, o and lets look into the pentagon witnesses, over 100 saw a large airliner, 26 specifically saw an AA plane. o AND NONE SAW A MISSILE, 0.  plus there was AA debris at the pentagon, even peices with the AA logo on it. no missile wreckage, 0. its clear the missile theory is crap. lets move to some "smoking guns" in NYC.  on the black box recordings that hit tower 2, u can clearly hear "no allah no allah."  an AA airlines flight attendant was found in a manhattan street, bound and gagged. many flight victims were found including the terrorists were identified. just some little known facts u should know before u waste ur life with 9/11 truth. 

P.S. bin laden admitted to the attacks, just wanted to let everyone know that, in case u CT's skipped over it. and yes the video was real.  CT's just picked one frame of that video, that made bin laden look quite not like bin laden.  watch the whole vid and you'll see its him.  the government used face-analyzing technology to make sure it was him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9/11 conspiracy theorists are such nuts.  there&#8217;s no evidence of an inside job. and hate to break to all you nuts,  u seem to ignore this, all the bodies  at the pentagon and flight 93 were identified, including the terrorists.  which dismisses that anything else crashed in pennsylvania, or crashed into the pentagon, o and lets look into the pentagon witnesses, over 100 saw a large airliner, 26 specifically saw an AA plane. o AND NONE SAW A MISSILE, 0.  plus there was AA debris at the pentagon, even peices with the AA logo on it. no missile wreckage, 0. its clear the missile theory is crap. lets move to some &#8220;smoking guns&#8221; in NYC.  on the black box recordings that hit tower 2, u can clearly hear &#8220;no allah no allah.&#8221;  an AA airlines flight attendant was found in a manhattan street, bound and gagged. many flight victims were found including the terrorists were identified. just some little known facts u should know before u waste ur life with 9/11 truth. </p>
<p>P.S. bin laden admitted to the attacks, just wanted to let everyone know that, in case u CT&#8217;s skipped over it. and yes the video was real.  CT&#8217;s just picked one frame of that video, that made bin laden look quite not like bin laden.  watch the whole vid and you&#8217;ll see its him.  the government used face-analyzing technology to make sure it was him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83778</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 18:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83778</guid>
		<description>In regard to WTC7, your link to seismic data seems to be faulty.  It points to a Flt 93 page, and I could find no seismic data anywhere on that site, please correct.  You also give the NIST "working theory" a little too much credit.  The report hasn't been completed yet, to my knowledge, and it is limited to an analysis of fire on floors 8-40somthing.  Interesting considering the damage from the collapse of WTC1 was mostly to the lower floors, as clearly pictured on that website posted for seismic data.

In regard to NIST report on WTC1 and 2 collapse.  "[T]he impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, which meant that the subsequent fire, which reached 1000 degrees Celsius, weakened the floors and columns to the point where they bowed and buckled, causing the towers to collapse."  The problem here, is jet fuel won't burn at this high (1000 C) of temperature, and the same NIST report claims that no piece of steel was found to have been heated higher than 600 C.

I hate conspiracy theories.  I suggest http://www.journalof911studies.com/ which seems to largely avoid them and focus on the evidence at hand in an open and scholarly way.

I will say, those are some interesting pictures of landing gear at the Pentagon.  If those can be authenticated (you'd have to talk to the production staff of the TLC program, and the source of photographs) then the missile theory should be revisited.  I didn't see, however, any engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In regard to WTC7, your link to seismic data seems to be faulty.  It points to a Flt 93 page, and I could find no seismic data anywhere on that site, please correct.  You also give the NIST &#8220;working theory&#8221; a little too much credit.  The report hasn&#8217;t been completed yet, to my knowledge, and it is limited to an analysis of fire on floors 8-40somthing.  Interesting considering the damage from the collapse of WTC1 was mostly to the lower floors, as clearly pictured on that website posted for seismic data.</p>
<p>In regard to NIST report on WTC1 and 2 collapse.  &#8220;[T]he impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, which meant that the subsequent fire, which reached 1000 degrees Celsius, weakened the floors and columns to the point where they bowed and buckled, causing the towers to collapse.&#8221;  The problem here, is jet fuel won&#8217;t burn at this high (1000 C) of temperature, and the same NIST report claims that no piece of steel was found to have been heated higher than 600 C.</p>
<p>I hate conspiracy theories.  I suggest <a href="http://www.journalof911studies.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalof911studies.com/</a> which seems to largely avoid them and focus on the evidence at hand in an open and scholarly way.</p>
<p>I will say, those are some interesting pictures of landing gear at the Pentagon.  If those can be authenticated (you&#8217;d have to talk to the production staff of the TLC program, and the source of photographs) then the missile theory should be revisited.  I didn&#8217;t see, however, any engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brittney</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83456</link>
		<dc:creator>brittney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 04:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/19911#comment-83456</guid>
		<description>THIS IS REDICULUS.
conspiracy theorists know the truth.
hate to break this to you,
but YOU, sir, need to be the one doing research.
9.11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS REDICULUS.<br />
conspiracy theorists know the truth.<br />
hate to break this to you,<br />
but YOU, sir, need to be the one doing research.<br />
9.11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
