<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slate Attacks Plagiarizing Journalists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernews.net/19130/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19130</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James S</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19130#comment-914869</link>
		<dc:creator>James S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernews.net/19130#comment-914869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I personally use the http://www.copygator.com website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:

1. it&#039;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#039;s republished my articles on the web.

2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.

3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.

4. it&#039;s a free service as opposed the &quot;per page&quot; cost of copyscape/copysentry.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I personally use the <a href="http://www.copygator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.copygator.com</a> website to find duplicated content. To me it has a number of benefits over copyscape and copyrightspot:</p>
<p>1. it&#8217;s automated and brings me results instead of me searching for duplicated content. All i had to do was submit my feed and it started monitoring my feed showing me who&#8217;s republished my articles on the web.</p>
<p>2. i get notified by email so it contacts me when it finds copies of my articles online.</p>
<p>3. i use their image badge feature to alert me directly on my website when my content is being lifted.</p>
<p>4. it&#8217;s a free service as opposed the &#8220;per page&#8221; cost of copyscape/copysentry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase.Hamil</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/19130#comment-70603</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase.Hamil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 13:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernews.net/19130#comment-70603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I would hesitate to call it plagiarism, there are certainly a few samples of the crime of &quot;cut and paste&quot; on the Blogger News Network. A fair number of contributions seem to be reprints of news or feature stories that appeared elsewhere on the Internet. While I suppose some readers appreciate having these items &quot;called to their attention,&quot; copyright laws still prevail. Most publications allow a paragraph or so to be quoted with proper attribution, but they certainly don&#039;t condone having the entire article reproduced verbatim, even with acknowledgement. I haven&#039;t seen any warnings posted by the monitors of BNN, but when an item is submitted as &quot;this post was written by,&quot; a lot of readers assume it was researched and written by the blogger whose name appears at the top of the piece.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I would hesitate to call it plagiarism, there are certainly a few samples of the crime of &#8220;cut and paste&#8221; on the Blogger News Network. A fair number of contributions seem to be reprints of news or feature stories that appeared elsewhere on the Internet. While I suppose some readers appreciate having these items &#8220;called to their attention,&#8221; copyright laws still prevail. Most publications allow a paragraph or so to be quoted with proper attribution, but they certainly don&#8217;t condone having the entire article reproduced verbatim, even with acknowledgement. I haven&#8217;t seen any warnings posted by the monitors of BNN, but when an item is submitted as &#8220;this post was written by,&#8221; a lot of readers assume it was researched and written by the blogger whose name appears at the top of the piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
