Comments on: Edwards attacks Clinton for taking News Corp contributions http://www.bloggernews.net/19092 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:58:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Feralgrognard http://www.bloggernews.net/19092#comment-69524 Feralgrognard Sat, 04 Aug 2007 04:40:36 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/19092#comment-69524 Now we have two "Zeitgeist leaders of the Kos DOOM-ocracy" having imploded in incompetence and ineptness in the same week. First, was Obama wanting to fight some 179 million, Nuclear armed, Pakistanis not realizing the geographic implication of even attempting such a military action let alone the cost and millions of soldiers require. Then tripping backwards and saying, he would not use nukes while back sliding on his macho policy pronouncement that has cause anti-American riots in Pakistan. Now that is top of the Line leadership International and military strategic awareness eh? Then comes along, foot in mouth diseased Preppy Edwards. He condemns the best Democrat on the ticket and threatens all the rest, for taking the Arch-Devil’s News Corp's money. While getting lost in his 30,000 SF Green mansion across from a Trailer park he is silent when ask if in fact he got $500,000 for his book published by that same Arch Devils company and got another $300,000 in expenses. Only slickly explaining it away by saying “it all went to charity”, oddly providing no evidence of that all. Add these two doom-cratic implosions to the Kos DOOM-ocracy's booing of Hillary and we have the perfect storm of intuitive counter support choice for moderates and conservative democrats. Yes, that vastly superior, yet silent majority yet decisively to speak in a Democratic majority. It will these silent ones that will use the Kos Doom-ocracy and its pan-handlers like Dodd, Obama and Edwards as counter supportive prove who is best to lead the party. Thank you Kos of DOOMocracy, for helping me, decide on Hillary. Now we have two “Zeitgeist leaders of the Kos DOOM-ocracy” having imploded in incompetence and ineptness in the same week. First, was Obama wanting to fight some 179 million, Nuclear armed, Pakistanis not realizing the geographic implication of even attempting such a military action let alone the cost and millions of soldiers require. Then tripping backwards and saying, he would not use nukes while back sliding on his macho policy pronouncement that has cause anti-American riots in Pakistan. Now that is top of the Line leadership International and military strategic awareness eh?

Then comes along, foot in mouth diseased Preppy Edwards. He condemns the best Democrat on the ticket and threatens all the rest, for taking the Arch-Devil’s News Corp’s money. While getting lost in his 30,000 SF Green mansion across from a Trailer park he is silent when ask if in fact he got $500,000 for his book published by that same Arch Devils company and got another $300,000 in expenses. Only slickly explaining it away by saying “it all went to charity”, oddly providing no evidence of that all.

Add these two doom-cratic implosions to the Kos DOOM-ocracy’s booing of Hillary and we have the perfect storm of intuitive counter support choice for moderates and conservative democrats. Yes, that vastly superior, yet silent majority yet decisively to speak in a Democratic majority. It will these silent ones that will use the Kos Doom-ocracy and its pan-handlers like Dodd, Obama and Edwards as counter supportive prove who is best to lead the party. Thank you Kos of DOOMocracy, for helping me, decide on Hillary.

]]> By: Antone Granada http://www.bloggernews.net/19092#comment-69288 Antone Granada Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:18:52 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/19092#comment-69288 I don't buy Edwards' contention that he did not benefit from the money paid to him by a FOX company for his book just because the money was donated to charity. Did the charitable organization send their acknowledgement and thank you's to the FOX company or to Edwards? What is on the charitable organization's records, his name or Murdoch's name? I don’t buy Edwards’ contention that he did not benefit from the money paid to him by a FOX company for his book just because the money was donated to charity. Did the charitable organization send their acknowledgement and thank you’s to the FOX company or to Edwards? What is on the charitable organization’s records, his name or Murdoch’s name?

]]>