Comments on: Economist gets it wrong, again and again, and again http://www.bloggernews.net/19060 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:01:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Lee Russ http://www.bloggernews.net/19060#comment-68676 Lee Russ Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:43:18 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/19060#comment-68676 The Economist is best as a source of news about the gobal economy; you kind of have to take the doctrinal bias along with that. But plain errors in the facts detract from the value of its news, hence from its best value. I'd hate to see the magazine go the shoddy way of so many other print pubications in this era of "Quality? How much can we charge for that?" The Economist is best as a source of news about the gobal economy; you kind of have to take the doctrinal bias along with that. But plain errors in the facts detract from the value of its news, hence from its best value.

I’d hate to see the magazine go the shoddy way of so many other print pubications in this era of “Quality? How much can we charge for that?”

]]> By: tony curzon price (OD, London) http://www.bloggernews.net/19060#comment-68487 tony curzon price (OD, London) Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:41:24 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/19060#comment-68487 Ranjit I have many sympathies with your "frustrated love" attitude to The Economist. I write at some length about it <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/trackback/4319" rel="nofollow">in this article.</a> In fact, <a href="http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-britannia_redux/debate.jsp" rel="nofollow">openDemocracy ran a whole series of articles </a>specifically on the economist that you might be interested in: Tony Ranjit

I have many sympathies with your “frustrated love” attitude to The Economist. I write at some length about it in this article.

In fact, openDemocracy ran a whole series of articles specifically on the economist that you might be interested in:

Tony

]]>