From Irvine, California, the Ayn Rand Institute has weighed in on on President Bush’s latest stem cell veto with the following editorial printed in the June 25 Hong Kong Times. Far be it from me to add commentary when it is not necessary.
Bush’s stem cell veto
Contrary to the claims of President George W. Bush (“Bush will try to soften stem cell veto,” June 21), there is nothing unethical about destroying embryos in the course of scientific research. An embryo is a potential, not an actual, human being, just as canvas is a potential, not an actual, work of art. It is a primitive cluster of cells, which is no more unethical to destroy than the cells that make up one’s appendix.
Calling an embryo “human life” is an evasion of the distinction between a mass of undifferentiated cells in a test tube and an actual, living human being.
Embryonic stem cell research could potentially improve the lives of millions. In an effort to obscure the anti-life consequences of his opposition to such research, the president cited new discoveries that suggest scientists might one day be able to create pluripotent cells from non-embryonic cells, supposedly making the “unethical” destruction of embryonic cells unnecessary.
But human welfare demands that scientists pursue every avenue that promises to realize the potential of stem cell technology – not abandon embryonic stem cell research in order to assuage faith-based objections.
We should praise this research for the life-enhancing breakthroughs it promises – and condemn the immoral attempt to return us to the Dark Ages, before science was liberated from the chains of religious dogmatism.
Dr. Keith Lockitch,
Ayn Rand Institute, Irvine, California