http://www.bloggernews.net/17933 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:58:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.bloggernews.net/17933#comment-43794 David Dalton Wed, 20 Jun 2007 18:00:28 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/17933#comment-43794 I kind of lost you there at the end Ian, but I appreciate the additional information about Sure Touch Visual Mapping. I kind of lost you there at the end Ian, but I appreciate the additional information about Sure Touch Visual Mapping.

]]> http://www.bloggernews.net/17933#comment-43555 Ian Finlayson Wed, 20 Jun 2007 09:50:34 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/17933#comment-43555 Well, well, mammogram missed some breast cancers? ... this is not exactly something that is new as it has been known for a long time that it does. Even the makers of the equipment admit that they will miss them and particularly if they are not calcified as the mammogram can't detect non-calcified lesions. maybe they should do another study using the brilliant NEW TECHNOLOGY developed by Dr Jae Son and his team at Medical Tactile Inc in Los Angeles, the SureTouch Visual Mapping System? This system has been proved to be over 94% in clinical trials in recognising malignant lesions and whats more it does not involve the use of any harmful radiation to create its images. It is a sensitive, accurate and pain free procedure that can be performed at a fraction of the cost of a mammogram so it is considerably cheaper than an MRI. In fact you can but many units and have them all over the country for the price of one MRI unit. Maybe somone would like to compare all three devices and I know which one will save more lives! You can check out the company and their amazing technology here; www.premammogram.com The challenge is now up to you to do the comparison and start be serious about saving lives and not the share price of multinational corporations. Well, well, mammogram missed some breast cancers? … this is not exactly something that is new as it has been known for a long time that it does. Even the makers of the equipment admit that they will miss them and particularly if they are not calcified as the mammogram can’t detect non-calcified lesions.
maybe they should do another study using the brilliant NEW TECHNOLOGY developed by Dr Jae Son and his team at Medical Tactile Inc in Los Angeles, the SureTouch Visual Mapping System?
This system has been proved to be over 94% in clinical trials in recognising malignant lesions and whats more it does not involve the use of any harmful radiation to create its images. It is a sensitive, accurate and pain free procedure that can be performed at a fraction of the cost of a mammogram so it is considerably cheaper than an MRI.
In fact you can but many units and have them all over the country for the price of one MRI unit.
Maybe somone would like to compare all three devices and I know which one will save more lives!
You can check out the company and their amazing technology here; http://www.premammogram.com
The challenge is now up to you to do the comparison and start be serious about saving lives and not the share price of multinational corporations.

]]>