<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rosie&#8217;s Actions Speak The Loudest</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/17198</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/17198#comment-32551</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/17198#comment-32551</guid>
		<description>Wow Chris Jones!  That was some piece you wrote on Rosie and Elisabeth's argument.  Nice to see who's side you are taking, so very obviously.  I thought as someone reporting on a subject you should be writing without bias.  Funny, guess I was wrong.  This was your opinion, which many share, but not all and that really was not at all how it happened.  When you wrote, "It is clear to anyone with at least a 5th grade education that her implication was that the U.S. is the real terrorist not the citizens of Iraq." You were incorrect in 2 aspects.  A) By the U.S. being the real terrorists, Rosie referred to the Bush Administration and not the U.S. people or the troops as it was being misreported.  That was what Rosie was angry about and B) The Iraqi civilians are not the terrorists.  The U.S. invaded them.  el quaida are the terrorists not the civilians.  You didn't get that?  Funny also that you see Elisabeth as standing up to Rosie when it was quite obvious that she was arrogant and sarcastic even cutting off Joy with sarcastic remarks as she was listing her facts.  Rosie is the bully in your eye, but not all.  Try reporting next time without stating your opinion as fact.  We all don't see it your way.  Try watching Barbara Walters sometime so you can see how to report without bias.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Chris Jones!  That was some piece you wrote on Rosie and Elisabeth&#8217;s argument.  Nice to see who&#8217;s side you are taking, so very obviously.  I thought as someone reporting on a subject you should be writing without bias.  Funny, guess I was wrong.  This was your opinion, which many share, but not all and that really was not at all how it happened.  When you wrote, &#8220;It is clear to anyone with at least a 5th grade education that her implication was that the U.S. is the real terrorist not the citizens of Iraq.&#8221; You were incorrect in 2 aspects.  A) By the U.S. being the real terrorists, Rosie referred to the Bush Administration and not the U.S. people or the troops as it was being misreported.  That was what Rosie was angry about and B) The Iraqi civilians are not the terrorists.  The U.S. invaded them.  el quaida are the terrorists not the civilians.  You didn&#8217;t get that?  Funny also that you see Elisabeth as standing up to Rosie when it was quite obvious that she was arrogant and sarcastic even cutting off Joy with sarcastic remarks as she was listing her facts.  Rosie is the bully in your eye, but not all.  Try reporting next time without stating your opinion as fact.  We all don&#8217;t see it your way.  Try watching Barbara Walters sometime so you can see how to report without bias.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
