Comments on: Will a grownup be our next president? http://www.bloggernews.net/17123 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:44:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Steve http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30800 Steve Sun, 27 May 2007 06:35:35 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30800 Typical right wing spin. Living in the US for his entire childhood except for ages 6-10 is not "growing up in Asia". Typical right wing spin. Living in the US for his entire childhood except for ages 6-10 is not “growing up in Asia”.

]]> By: James http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30401 James Sat, 26 May 2007 07:35:14 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30401 superb. a trenchant analysis. High quality English is your primary recommendation - well done. besides that, the fact that you dismiss the two frontrunning democratic candidates based on their "parroting to the left" is, again, right on the mark. America is, as the polls clearly show, solidly on Bush's side. obviously, the military should be in charge of all foreign policy. the fact that most high-level generals (especially the ones whose careers don't depend on toeing the party line) have come out against Bush's policy is to be interpreted as cowardice on the Iraq question. cowards. its difficult to know where first to critique your stance. experience tells us that people such as you are not worth critiquing. you exist as a mouth-piece for a view that posits ignorance as its basic value. just know that you are obvious, and that, to anyone who has studied history from a non-reactionary viewpoint, you are a tool of the ruling class. cheers. superb. a trenchant analysis. High quality English is your primary recommendation - well done. besides that, the fact that you dismiss the two frontrunning democratic candidates based on their “parroting to the left” is, again, right on the mark. America is, as the polls clearly show, solidly on Bush’s side.

obviously, the military should be in charge of all foreign policy. the fact that most high-level generals (especially the ones whose careers don’t depend on toeing the party line) have come out against Bush’s policy is to be interpreted as cowardice on the Iraq question. cowards.

its difficult to know where first to critique your stance. experience tells us that people such as you are not worth critiquing. you exist as a mouth-piece for a view that posits ignorance as its basic value. just know that you are obvious, and that, to anyone who has studied history from a non-reactionary viewpoint, you are a tool of the ruling class. cheers.

]]> By: bi mueller http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30380 bi mueller Sat, 26 May 2007 06:17:52 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/17123#comment-30380 I think Obama's comments make perfect sense whereas McCain's rebuttal certainly does not! What seems to be 'catastrophic to our nation's security' is any increase of our presence in a place we should not have done all that destruction in the first place. His answer is priceless??? because it is so utterly senseless??? as you say: yup! Mccain went through hell back then, but he does not know what he is talking about because of that. I think Obama’s comments make perfect sense whereas McCain’s rebuttal certainly does not! What seems to be ‘catastrophic to our nation’s security’ is any increase of our presence in a place we should not have done all that destruction in the first place. His answer is priceless??? because it is so utterly senseless???
as you say: yup! Mccain went through hell back then, but he does not know what he is talking about because of that.

]]>