<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your vote counts [but not as much as it used to]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloggernews.net/17016/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/17016</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 19:52:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JIMMY</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/17016#comment-29193</link>
		<dc:creator>JIMMY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 20:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloggernews.net/17016#comment-29193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THANK YOU FOR YOUR WELL WRITTEN TIMELY AND IMPORTANT PUPLIC SERVICE GIVEN BY THIS ARTICLE ON ONE PERSON ONE VOTE FAIRNESS THAT GOES TO DEFINING GOOD, FAIR AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.

AS FAR AS SENATE  VOTE VALUE IS CONCERNED  IT IS NOT A MATTER OF ONE TENTH OF A VOTE INCREASE OR DECREASE OR A 6% INCREASE OR DECREASE OR 6 TIMES INCREASE OR DECREASE BUT A 60 TIMES INCREASE FOR PEOPLE OF MONTANA AND OTHER  STATES OF ABOUT HALF A MILLION PEOPLE, BUT A 60 TIMES INCREASE OVER PEOPLE IN CALIFORNIA. THIS BECAUSE MONTANA GETS 2 SENATE  VOTES FOR ABOUT HALF A MILLION PEOPLE WHILE THE 30 MILLION IN CALIFORNIA GET THE SAME TWO VOTES TO REPRESENT 30 MILLION PEOPLE.  CALIFORNIA SENDS AN ARMY OF SOLDIERS, SAILORS, MARINES AND AIR MEN TO THE DEFENSE AND WARS OF OUR COUNTRY COMPARED TO MONTANA.  BUT MONTANA CANCELS THEIR VOTE REPRESENTATION IN THE SENATE.  AND WHEN YOU BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER LESS THAN A MILLION CITIZEN STATES WITH THEM, MAYBE NORTH DAKOTA, AND SOUTH DAKOTA THOSE MILLION AND A HALF VOTERS OUT VOTE 30 MILLION CALIFORNIANS  6 TO 2 IN THE  SENATE.  WHY CAN&#039;T CALIFORNIA HAVE THE SAME SENATE  REPRESENTATION PER CITIZEN AS THE SMALL POPULATION STATES?  IS IT NOT WRONG THAT THE MOTHERS, FATHERS AND LOVED ONES OF SOLDIERS FROM CALIFORNIA GET ONLY 1/60th OF THE REPRESENTATION AS THOSE FROM SMALL POPULATION STATES ?  IS IT NOT RIGHT TO HAVE ONE VOTE ONE PERSON FOR ALL OUR CITIZENS ON SUCH IMPORTANT POLICIES AS WAR POLICIES AND BUDGET POLICES?   
THE FACT OF ONE-PERSON ONE VOTE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DOES NOTHING BECAUSE THE ONE PERSON ONE VOTE IN THE HOUSE  IS COMPLETELY VETOED BY THE  SENATE WHERE NO HOUSE LEGISLATION CAN PASS UNLESS THE SENATE MINORITY COALITIONS SATES  ALLOW IT. WHAT IS NEEDED IS ONE PERSON ONE VOTE REPRESENTATION IN THE SENATE.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU FOR YOUR WELL WRITTEN TIMELY AND IMPORTANT PUPLIC SERVICE GIVEN BY THIS ARTICLE ON ONE PERSON ONE VOTE FAIRNESS THAT GOES TO DEFINING GOOD, FAIR AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT.</p>
<p>AS FAR AS SENATE  VOTE VALUE IS CONCERNED  IT IS NOT A MATTER OF ONE TENTH OF A VOTE INCREASE OR DECREASE OR A 6% INCREASE OR DECREASE OR 6 TIMES INCREASE OR DECREASE BUT A 60 TIMES INCREASE FOR PEOPLE OF MONTANA AND OTHER  STATES OF ABOUT HALF A MILLION PEOPLE, BUT A 60 TIMES INCREASE OVER PEOPLE IN CALIFORNIA. THIS BECAUSE MONTANA GETS 2 SENATE  VOTES FOR ABOUT HALF A MILLION PEOPLE WHILE THE 30 MILLION IN CALIFORNIA GET THE SAME TWO VOTES TO REPRESENT 30 MILLION PEOPLE.  CALIFORNIA SENDS AN ARMY OF SOLDIERS, SAILORS, MARINES AND AIR MEN TO THE DEFENSE AND WARS OF OUR COUNTRY COMPARED TO MONTANA.  BUT MONTANA CANCELS THEIR VOTE REPRESENTATION IN THE SENATE.  AND WHEN YOU BUT A COUPLE OF OTHER LESS THAN A MILLION CITIZEN STATES WITH THEM, MAYBE NORTH DAKOTA, AND SOUTH DAKOTA THOSE MILLION AND A HALF VOTERS OUT VOTE 30 MILLION CALIFORNIANS  6 TO 2 IN THE  SENATE.  WHY CAN&#8217;T CALIFORNIA HAVE THE SAME SENATE  REPRESENTATION PER CITIZEN AS THE SMALL POPULATION STATES?  IS IT NOT WRONG THAT THE MOTHERS, FATHERS AND LOVED ONES OF SOLDIERS FROM CALIFORNIA GET ONLY 1/60th OF THE REPRESENTATION AS THOSE FROM SMALL POPULATION STATES ?  IS IT NOT RIGHT TO HAVE ONE VOTE ONE PERSON FOR ALL OUR CITIZENS ON SUCH IMPORTANT POLICIES AS WAR POLICIES AND BUDGET POLICES?<br />
THE FACT OF ONE-PERSON ONE VOTE IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DOES NOTHING BECAUSE THE ONE PERSON ONE VOTE IN THE HOUSE  IS COMPLETELY VETOED BY THE  SENATE WHERE NO HOUSE LEGISLATION CAN PASS UNLESS THE SENATE MINORITY COALITIONS SATES  ALLOW IT. WHAT IS NEEDED IS ONE PERSON ONE VOTE REPRESENTATION IN THE SENATE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
