<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIME magazine&#8217;s &#8220;Top 100&#8243;&#8230;the end of journalism as we know it</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The end of journalism? &#171; Ethical Martini</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-687344</link>
		<dc:creator>The end of journalism? &#171; Ethical Martini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-687344</guid>
		<description>[...] Writing on the Blogger News Network site, Chase Hamil made the argument explicit in relation to the failure of Time magazine to nominate George W Bush as one of the most influential people of 2007. The selections (and omissions) of TIME’s 2007 Top 100 list are one more piece of evidence of the growing liberal slant of most major media outlets. Here are some of the bimbos and bozos who did make the list: Rosie O’Donnell, Kate Moss, Tina Fey, Sacha Baron Cohen (also known as “Borat”), Leonardo DiCaprio, and Justin Timberlake. [read Hamil's opinions] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Writing on the Blogger News Network site, Chase Hamil made the argument explicit in relation to the failure of Time magazine to nominate George W Bush as one of the most influential people of 2007. The selections (and omissions) of TIME’s 2007 Top 100 list are one more piece of evidence of the growing liberal slant of most major media outlets. Here are some of the bimbos and bozos who did make the list: Rosie O’Donnell, Kate Moss, Tina Fey, Sacha Baron Cohen (also known as “Borat”), Leonardo DiCaprio, and Justin Timberlake. [read Hamil&#8217;s opinions] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-21842</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-21842</guid>
		<description>Excellent read!  Thanks for that article and for the truth!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent read!  Thanks for that article and for the truth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pangia</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-21099</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pangia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2007 22:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/16565#comment-21099</guid>
		<description>Well said, and a true sign of the times [no pun intended].
Borat?  For what?  Lowering the intellectual quotient of comedy?
Justin Timberlake?  Influential?  To who over the age of 12?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, and a true sign of the times [no pun intended].<br />
Borat?  For what?  Lowering the intellectual quotient of comedy?<br />
Justin Timberlake?  Influential?  To who over the age of 12?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
