<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biting the hand that feeds: the Alan Johnston story</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16466</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kate Poland</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/16466#comment-19717</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate Poland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 08:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/16466#comment-19717</guid>
		<description>In the interests of good reporting, I think it would be helpful if Sidereal gave examples of Alan Johnston's "one-sided", "pro-Palestinian" depiction of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, rather than throw out random insults at his journalism.  There is a place for criticising the coverage of conflicts, and individual reporters, but in this case you seem to be confusing bias with telling a story in a humane way and explaining the conditions people live in.  This is what Alan Johnston does in his reporting.  He's not apportioning blame.  He just describes the results - mostly on a domestic level - of many years of conflict.  The trouble with war is that ordinary people suffer - whatever side they are on.  Alan Johnston reported on those ordinary people.   He is a decent, honest man and what everyone should be doing rather than flinging insults - is campaigning for the release of a man just trying to tell a story with integrity.  It doesn't matter whether you agree with what he says or how he says it.  What matters is that a man has been kidnapped for being a journalist.  Anyone interested in reporting and free speech should be taking action against that injustice not whining about who said what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interests of good reporting, I think it would be helpful if Sidereal gave examples of Alan Johnston&#8217;s &#8220;one-sided&#8221;, &#8220;pro-Palestinian&#8221; depiction of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, rather than throw out random insults at his journalism.  There is a place for criticising the coverage of conflicts, and individual reporters, but in this case you seem to be confusing bias with telling a story in a humane way and explaining the conditions people live in.  This is what Alan Johnston does in his reporting.  He&#8217;s not apportioning blame.  He just describes the results - mostly on a domestic level - of many years of conflict.  The trouble with war is that ordinary people suffer - whatever side they are on.  Alan Johnston reported on those ordinary people.   He is a decent, honest man and what everyone should be doing rather than flinging insults - is campaigning for the release of a man just trying to tell a story with integrity.  It doesn&#8217;t matter whether you agree with what he says or how he says it.  What matters is that a man has been kidnapped for being a journalist.  Anyone interested in reporting and free speech should be taking action against that injustice not whining about who said what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
