David Schussler
Suppose we all put “church” and “religion” aside for a moment and thought that perhaps there is an omnipresent creating and/or driving force that is manifest in each of us that we call God. Would this God want us to believe for an instant that we are supposed to do harm of any kind to one another?
In this day and age, and throughout recorded history, we have endured crime and battles for supremacy that defy common decency and simple logic.
Circa 1780 BC, Hammarabi’s Code established rules and laws that fairly decided punishments for a complicated and already corrupt society in Mesopotamia. Those rules were divided (by man) into two groups, those that could be decided by man, and those that could only be decided by God. With the rules decided by man there were exact and explicit penalties imposed for specific offenses. Most of the world uses this as the basis for their criminal and civil laws. With those decided by God, the individual went free knowing that he or she would be supremely judged one day. And as it truly is, unless someone proclaims to be a conduit for God, there can be no true judgment by man. Most of the ten commandments are also simple rules that could easily have been written by any one of thousands of people of its day. They are common sense rules that can easily be attributed to an all powerful force that guides us. All of these basic rules and laws are basic to all of the religions of the world and are all intended to perpetrate a peaceful society, and yet, look where the world has arrived at!
This is the age of communication technology where it is easy to create worldwide communication that reaches deep into the jungles, from pole to pole, and far into the seas. Where is the voice of reason that the world needs to hear? Is there no leader unafraid to speak to the world with non-sectarian common sense that is understood by all?
We are so inundated with pressure to belong to this group and that, and to have this belief and that, based on some charismatic leader, that we fail to see that there are fundamental truths that are common to all people that must be expressed to the world ….. now!
For the sake of argument, let’s agree that there is a God in all of us that is also apart from us. When we are faced with a decision to harm another in some way, we should ask ourselves, “is this what God would do, is this what God would have us do”?
Regardless of which, if any, prophet may have led us to God we will all always come to the same simple conclusion. Whatever supreme being one believes in, or even if one believes only in good will for all, we all want peace and the freedom to live our lives according to our individual desires. What an easy message this is to declare to all of the peoples of the world. Everyone can understand it but it requires someone to separate from their attachment to narrow minded exclusionary views and speak out with magnanamous sincerity and longing for world peace. Perhaps those in world leadership roles now have so committed themselves to their points of view as to not be the catalyst so needed today.
A spokesman for humanity need not be a president, king, prime minister, or Pope. A spokesman for humanity need not profess one religion over another but profess an enthusiasm for peaceful life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all mankind.
Will a passionate real world leader please stand up and objectively and unreservedly speak up on behalf of the oppressed, the starving, the sick, the impoverished, and all children of this planet?……Now!















2 users commented in " What Would God Do? Will A Real World Leader Please Stand Up? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackHi David
We at We Want World Peace have a plan that will do just what you are suggesting. Please go to wewantworldpeace.com and see what you think. We need people like you so that we can build the new world that REPLACES WAR WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW AND ORDER. Let us know what you think.
Love, Peace and God Bless
wewantworldpeace.com
Duffy Gorski
Duffy Lloyd Gorski
I read your website comprehensively and find the same thing lacking that causes conflict in this world. It speaks of evolution but ignores the conflicting major catalyst. “Creation”. Most of the world religions consider men and women to have been created. So if your new world order were to respect all religions equally we would have to consider exactly what is causing much of the grief worldwide today. Those who think that their religion is the only one acceptable to the exclusion (and extinction) of all others.
My answer to the first question of your ten questions is …No. Do baby killers deserve equal human rights? Do rapists deserve equal rights? etc.
Are all people “entitled” to social government programs?
Social government programs are causing and perpetuating much of the inner city crime that exists today in many countries.
True, we are a brotherhood of man entitled to peace and the pursuit of happiness (which is missing in your treatise by the way), but all cultures do not adhere to the same moral codes. Age of marriage, for instance, sexual conduct, civil behavior of many types. Does anyone believe for an instant that generations of conduct can be changed to a unanimity of behavior? A simple spiritual voice of reason must be heard that will proclaim common sense. The peoples of the world must come to a realization that can be taught to our children. Falsehoods being taught by false priests must be exposed and new self government will follow. No one world government or set of laws can ever exist because regardless of the sameness and oneness that we have in our hearts, our heads think and reason differently. Our habits are different.
Peace and freedom are not synonomous. Peace can be achieved through slavery and totalitarianism easier than through democracy. Democracy also is not ideal because it overlooks, excludes, and neglects the minority. That is why the founding fathers of America created a Republic. The republic was and is a well thought out plan of government for a people escaping tyranny and seeking a better life. It is unfortunately over evolving. Many good things have come to pass helping to make all people equal regarding slavery, women’s rights, etc., but now we are bogged down in issues like public entitlements, abortion, and a gamut of civil liberty issues that do not belong in government control. They are issues that should be debated and resolved by the people without government intervention.
No, a new world government is not the answer. It would only be the birth of a horrendous experiment that could not be policed and would result in anarchy that would destroy civilization.
Civilization (an arbitrary word which is supposed to indicate something better than the way things were) is already destroying itself with genocide and war, and global natural disasters are depleting another good portion of our population right now. I believe the world needs a soothing voice of reason that could easily be heard by all or God or Karma or whatever powers to be that you might believe in will take care of all of the problems somehow. The handwriting is on the wall. We all have that voice of reason within us. It only needs to be spoken and heard.
Good Luck, at least you are attempting to do something. Just beware of blindly adoring someone’s philosophy without listening to the voice of reason within yourself
David Schussler
Leave A Reply