Recently, Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama unveiled his plan to deal with the issue of climate change. Obama’s plan is modeled after the one recently signed into law, through an executive order, by California governor Schwarzenegger. In January Schwarzenegger created a statewide low carbon fuel standard. Obama intends to take the California plan nationwide. “This is our generation’s moment to save future generations from global catastrophe by creating a market for clean-burning fuels that can stop the dangerous transformation of our climate,” said Obama. “In states like New Hampshire and California, people are taking the lead on producing fuels that use less carbon. It’s time we made this a national commitment to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and take the equivalent of 32 million cars’ worth of pollution out of the atmosphere.”
A press release put out by his campaign said that Obama believes that we ought to become more efficient with our use of oil, and find a way to remove automobile pollution from the air. “It will take a grassroots effort to make America greener and end the tyranny of oil. This Earth Day should mark the beginning of a nationwide effort to harness our technology, our ingenuity and our will to achieve energy independence in our time,” Obama said. His proposal would require that transportation fuels contain 5% less carbon by 2015, and 10% less by 2020. He also advocates a carbon credit system that would allow fuel providers to sell their credits to those that still used fuels which contained more carbon. He also would allow polluters to borrow credits against future promised cuts.
The campaign says that a National Low Carbon Fuel Standard (NLCFS) would push the market towards fuels that use less carbon, and it would also promote growth in cleaner fuels and technologies. Emissions credit trading is a deeply flawed concept that undercuts the purpose of any legislation that it is attached to. Emissions credit trading is a way for big business and corporate America to buy their way around the law. Credit trading will also create an uneven implementation of the law. The biggest polluters will be able to afford to buy more credits, thus the people most responsible for the climate change problem can buy their way out of having to change.
My impression is that the Obama campaign, much like the Clinton campaign, is a bit short on ideas. It also strikes me that this is a fairly conservative proposal. There is nothing wrong with proposing that the California plan be taken national, after it has been tried, and we have some preliminary data to see if it works. A plan like this may work at the state level, but will it work for the entire nation? The truth is that politicians are trying to dance around the fact that the only way we are going to deal with the issues of oil dependence and climate change is to cut consumption.
Consumption can’t be deeply cut through credit trading programs, or 15-20 year plans. In order to be effective, stricter standards must be equally applied to everyone in all areas. The market will adjust to that too. The government still needs to spend some serious money subsidizing the research and development of better technology. It is too late to propose plans that might work in decades. Our dependence on foreign oil could very well end up crippling the U.S. economy someday. I don’t care if you are a liberal or conservative. I think we all can agree that this is a frightening thought. Political leaders in both parties need to stop being so cute about this issue, and do their jobs. Our future really does depend on it.
Jason Easley is the editor of the politics zone at 411mania.com. His news column The Political Universe appears on Tuesdays and Fridays at www.411mania.com/politics
Jason can also be heard every Sunday afternoon at 1:30 pm (ET) as the host of The Political Universe Radio Show at http://www.blogtalkradio.com/thepoliticaluniverse













(25 votes, average: 4.28 out of 5)

44 users commented in " Barack Obama’s global warming plan "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackYesterday Sen. Chris Dodd was in town, and I asked him about his energy policy plan. He did mention a carbon tax, and forcing automobile companes to increase fuel efficiencies. Public transportation and lowering speed limits was not mentioned in his comments to me, nor were other ways to directly lower consumption. While not specifically stated, I got a sense from him that corporate America was the evil behind all this. I specifically asked him what he was going to ask of the American people in dealing with our energy crisis, and he was vague in responding to that.
Yes, when you look at the plans from all the candidates from either party, no one wants to cut consumption, but that is what needs to be done.
I think it is a knee-jerk left reaction to discount carbon trading as one part of an energy strategy. I also think there is too much emphasis being placed on policy proposals coming from the candidates. None of the proposals are worth the paper it is printed on. What matters is what can be passed which is something that will be determined by the political process.
Obama has the most progressive voting record, and his biography demonstrates commitment to progressive values. I think he is the most electable and will have the strongest coattails.
Great article. I enjoyed reading it.
I think we need to know what our candidates stand for on the issues as well so I created a site to track presidential candidates and the first article is always the current scorecard of their political stances. Check it out. http://www.candidatepositions.com
The replies on what he’s going to do is vague without any real details. It just sounds like an idea and I think we all know that big business like the oil companies and auto makers will do what they can to get in the way.
They done it before to destroy the wonderfully efficient, clean and favorable electric car- because they realized it hurts their profits. Fighting big business that’s tied into our government is hard. I don’t know if he’s going to do it… or even if he’s willing to do it.
Everyone should read Chapter 5 of the following think tank report:
http://www.archive.org/details/TheFirstGlobalRevolution
i feel that barack obama should show us all a lesson im in sixth grade and i think that this is a good way to start with getting ride of it or a least minimizing it.it is hard for some but easy for others.over the last couple year the raising temp. from day to day has raised.
hey mr.obama.
this is a good plan for the global warming.i think people should read chapter 5.
interesting
Hello, soon to be president
Mr.Obama I am working on a group project in class on you, and I read this article about the change you wont to make on gobal warming I think it is a great idea.
I HOPE YOU BECAME PRESIDENT,IF I WAS OLD ENOUGH I WOULD VOTE FOR YOU NOT BECAUSE YOU ARE BLACK IN WHICH YOU ARE MIX ,BUT BECAUSE YOU REALLY WONT TO MAKE A CHANGE AND YOU TALK ABOUT THE CHANGES YOU WON TO MAKE UNKIKE THE OTHERS.(NOT CALLING NO NAMES}
i am doing a project in school and we are supposed to think about questions to ask you and try to find the answers……i have 1 question 4 u…..if you could change a law which would it be and why???
well (this is 4 chicago) i am in 7th grade and i love the message….
i need questions to ask mr.obama i am working on a project and i need more info…
i think that barack obama doesn’t know what he is talking about
I found this quite odd. I mean why does he bother. yes the global temperatures have gone up but my small amounts (about 0.6 degrees since the early 1900s). another thing is it is called “global” warming. not everywhere on earth is getting warmer, just some places. and again in small amounts. One more thing, studies show that it was a lot hotter in the middle ages than it is today and they didn’t have cars or air polutants like we do. therfore I say global warming is mostly bogus. it is real but to have any segnifacent chenges in the climate it would take hudreds of years to be able to say that bad things are happening because the temperature is too hot.
One more thing, if anyone would like to coment of what I have just writen, please just type another message and I will probobly get back to you.
I think that obama is doing right about this global warming plan because if he doesn’t then slowly the environment will get worse and worse each time.
GO OBAMA!!!!
I think Senator Obama fully understands the importance and the commitment of the situation, as well as how delicate it all can be. Obama is very suttle and keeps to neutral territory, bending towards clean technologies, but not completely crossing the lines either. He understands how important the dirty industries are, so he keeps them, but at a high price. I don’t think it will be enough to achieve his goal of helping to put of global warming, but at the moment- what else can we do? Yeah, if i were in his place i would probably have no choice but to do the same thing, but it doesn’t leave us very satisfied. Some people asked me “will it be enough?”, and i always tried to be truthful. “No, it won’t be enough.” So, that’s that. Bam. Global Warming, i will get you i swear, but not with Obama in the house.
I hope you don’t misinterpret me. Obama is close to powerless here, but he still knows how to handle it better then McCain. Republicans just can’t do green. Period.
yo pienso que obama deveria ganar por que el quiere ayudar a los latinos…
solo hablam pero no hacen nada para ayudarlos…
obama…
espero que no seas como los otros presidente.. por que los inmigrantes lo que hacen es ayudar en este pais…
To Maria.
Yes the environment will get worse but not enough to cause any problems. I have no clue how old you are but lets say you were 10. by the time your 100 the global temperature will have gone up by 1 degree, and I’m seious. it is not that big a change in the temperature to do any real damage on the environment. its not such a big deal. But we do want to keep our environment safe but Obama is acting like if we don’t change now we will all die tommorow.
i think that obama is right he might have to do what he thinks is the best
i think that obama is right he might have to do what he thinks is the best and wel he rocks for doing the best …k viva obama
GLOBAL WARMING CAN BE REVERSED WITHIN 5 YEARS
if we can increase the humus content of the world’s agricultural lands by just 1 %, yes one percent per year for 5 years. This according to professor Raggam of Graz University Austria.
Humus is a carbon sink. Agri chemicals have depleted the humus over the last 100 years to almost nothing. This can be reversed with just
5 kg per hectare per year of our organic products which can be dissolved in water and applied to fields with regular irrigation eqipment or be plane.
Our products stimulate the bacteria needed to break down organic materials into humus.
IN ADDITION HUMUS IS LIKE A SPONGE HOLDING WATER PROTECTING THE CROPS AGAINST DROUGHTS! Forest fires could be reduced. (California)
Crops yields increase. A test in Canada by a University confirmed 30% more yield of corn.
This could free lands for growing bio fuels without endangering the food supply!
Farmers could earn carbon credits.
etc.etc.
Please reply so we can establish contact and submit to you complete information and test results.
Martin E. Borner,
Vice Pres.
PODERCO S.A.
Apdo. 135, 4100 GRECIA, Central Amercia
Tel/Fax 506 2494-5868
e mail mimosa@mimosa.co.cr
not much more time left till obama is taken to white house and i think he will do the right thing. OBAMA OBAMA OBAMA OBA OBA OBAMA
It’s going to be a trip to see what is going to happen over the next year. I can only hope for the best!
Its easy to talk about the problem but hard to actually fix it. And in this case there is no one easy answer to solve global climate change. If you guys are interested in solving economic and political problems go to 99problems.org
i like 99problems.org Its a great site. Everyone that voted needs to check it out!
I keep hearing about 99problems.org, so I checked it out for myself…I must say I was pretty impressed. I like the fact that this organization is going around the country to get young adults more involved with our nation/world issues!
99problems.org is definitely making a very large impact in this necessary green revolution that needs to take place in order to prolong our existence on this very planet. Lets get it together yaw, its nation time!!!
its great to see that obama is so perceptive to what other communities are doing. He has surrounded himself with a great team. i checked out that site you guys were talking about and its pretty dope.. the first 100 days are gonna be tough, but we will get through it!
Like a wound that heals itself, nature will heal the planet if global warming is left unchecked, even if billions of lives have to be sacrificed.
Automakers are seeking a $75 billion bailout from the Obama administration. Obama should take this opportunity to make the automakers commit on producing energy efficient automobiles, otherwise let the existing industry collapse and built a new energy efficient auto industry.
Dear Mr. Easley,
I dont take your article as something i would like fot other citizens of this country to read. My reasons are the following:
Americans, we need someone to motivate us to do something. If we read an article and they are already talking bad of how Obamas plan wont work, then everyboy will give up or wont give it a chance to work. Secondly, there are Americans who actually do care about this planet. Earth is really our true home, so we better stop being babies about it and act as the adults we are. We have to face the fact that if no one does it we have to do it. Its true, consumption does have to do with it. Just like i said, if we really want to do something about we can. I am a normal college student, but the only difference is that… im making a difference. im involved with a group of students to change our community to take a look of what happening to our home. At first we thought no one would listen to us, but for our surprice there were a lot of people who belive in us and now our group has over 200 ppl involed in making our home a better place to live.
i think global warming is happening because of the things that we have been seeing #1 the ice melting #2 the polar bears going instinked and #3 the green house affect talked abouthow the gases are melting the ice.
global warming should go suck it
koooooool!!!!! i think global warming is a serious issue! and we should all help prevent!!!
None of these replys matter as long as the government and others take these things seriously in the end this world will fall because of its stupidity!
U people posting comments should pick up some trash or something befor u leave these annoying comments about what we should do. Because ur not doing a DARN thing!
i agree. if you truly want to help, do something to help. i believe that america, everyday, is getting more and more lazy with everything. we can always help the world. just one step at a time, and we can really make a change and help the world. “trust me” i know what you mean.
Trying To Take Internet and Free Speech From You!
Democrats have introduced a Bill HR 1966 to try and take away the Internet and Free speech from the American people! If this Bill gets passed you won’t even recognize the Internet 2 they’ll introduce to you - it will be little more than a TV monitor on your desk top as they want to stop people from being able to communicate on the net!
Please telephone, write to and visit your congressman and Senator and tell them to vote against Bill HR 1966 !
Write to your Congressmen and Senators and urgently request that they vote NO to Bill HR 1966
Is “…the consensus of scientists agree that greenhouse gases cause global warming” a true statement?
Does climate change involve difficult complicated science?
Is it reasonable for anyone anywhere have an opinion on climate change?
Are opinion surveys on whether you believe climate change is important or urgent reasonable and valid means of forming public opinion and public policy?
Are legislators qualified to rule on public policy in re to changing behavior and taxing citizens on climate change slash / global warming?
As a general matter is science determined based on opinions or demonstrable scientific evidence?
Should Obama’s Secretary Chu speak publicly as he did recently in support of geoengineering solutions such as painting rooftops white? Regardless of his credentials. Before the science is weighed.
Is opinion “knowledge” and is knowledge “truth”?
People who know nothing of science (or are trained in science but speaking in ways that are not scientific or outside of their qualifications) or the Scientific Method but aver opinions based on how some idea agrees with preconceived notions in their stomach - mind should first go back and science along with development of logical philosophy / logical mathematics going back to Plato, Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas, George Berkeley, David Hume, Bertrand Russell, Alfred North Whitehead, AJ Ayer, William James, Charles Sanders Peirce, John Dewey, Frank Ramsey, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Karl Popper, and on and on.
Otherwise the notion that anyone / you are permitted to have opinions is laughable and 100% meaningless…
I have witnessed global warming for years. Coming from Alaska, I have seen glaciers retreat. I came across this video that shows global warming in action here: http://www.filmbaby.com/films/4148. I showed my former global warming skeptic friends this movie and they all now believe it is happening at an alarming rate.
I TOTALLY DISAGREE WITH THIS STUPID PLAN!!!
SURELY YOU CAN THINK OF SOMETHING BETTER THAN THIS CRAP!!!!!!
Leave A Reply