Comments on: New polls shows that many voters “reject” McCain, Romney, and Clinton http://www.bloggernews.net/16114 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:31:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: jmf http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15538 jmf Fri, 20 Apr 2007 15:21:42 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15538 Don't worry: Kerry proved that THINKING you are winning, almost certainly makes it so!!!! Don’t worry: Kerry proved that THINKING you are winning, almost certainly makes it so!!!!

]]> By: Raj http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15497 Raj Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:46:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15497 "John McCain’s decline in support can be directly tied to his support of the Iraq war." Some will say that it is tied to his liberal stance on immigration. However, it is interesting to note that his support really tanked only after he backed out of supporting "amnesty." The opponents of amnesty did not rush to support him and the crossover voters, including Hispanics, abandoned him. “John McCain’s decline in support can be directly tied to his support of the Iraq war.”

Some will say that it is tied to his liberal stance on immigration. However, it is interesting to note that his support really tanked only after he backed out of supporting “amnesty.” The opponents of amnesty did not rush to support him and the crossover voters, including Hispanics, abandoned him.

]]> By: Jenna Stewart http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15288 Jenna Stewart Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:01:16 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15288 So Obama's the big winner here. So Obama’s the big winner here.

]]> By: mikednc http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15110 mikednc Thu, 19 Apr 2007 07:49:49 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15110 whole crap reporting. it's obviously sourced from libs. whole crap reporting. it’s obviously sourced from libs.

]]> By: RC http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15008 RC Thu, 19 Apr 2007 02:03:55 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/16114#comment-15008 Wow, I've never seen a more bias representation of a poll. The "would vote for", "would not vote for" is based on independents. I wouldn't trust proven liberal media sources if I were you (that is, unless you are liberal). Ah, the accuracy of blogs. Pfftttt... Wow, I’ve never seen a more bias representation of a poll. The “would vote for”, “would not vote for” is based on independents. I wouldn’t trust proven liberal media sources if I were you (that is, unless you are liberal). Ah, the accuracy of blogs. Pfftttt…

]]>