http://www.bloggernews.net/15550 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Sun, 27 May 2012 20:45:25 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 http://www.bloggernews.net/15550#comment-8756 Ranjit Goswami Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:45:17 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/15550#comment-8756 It seems there is some confusion on the HC order interpretation as of now as reported in mainstream media. Even after one day of the order, media (TOIN, Nandigram: HC defers decision, CBI probe to go on, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/India/Nandigram_HC_defers_decision_CBI_probe_to_go_on/articleshow/1812727.cms) reported 'Calcutta High Court on Monday did not pass any fresh directions on the CBI probe into Nandigram violence but it did not restrain the investigating agency from carrying on with its ongoing inquiry...On Monday, advocate Kalyan Banerjee, who is also one of the petitioners, prayed to the court to direct the CBI to probe the Nandigram incidents. Banerjee submitted that at least 27 people were missing in Nandigram and hence CBI should be directed to carry on investigations. This was also supported by counsel for Association for Protection of Democratic Rights Jaymalya Bagchi. However, this prayer for a fresh probe was turned down.' So the question is whether the one sees investigating whereabouts of the missing persons fall under ongoing query or part of fresh probe. There were reports yesterday in mainstream media in line with above article ('Nandigram: HC no to continuing CBI probe', http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=1&theme=&usrsess=1&id=151079) and similar article appeared almost everywhere as well. It seems there is some confusion on the HC order interpretation as of now as reported in mainstream media. Even after one day of the order, media (TOIN, Nandigram: HC defers decision, CBI probe to go on, http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/India/Nandigram_HC_defers_decision_CBI_probe_to_go_on/articleshow/1812727.cms) reported ‘Calcutta High Court on Monday did not pass any fresh directions on the CBI probe into Nandigram violence but it did not restrain the investigating agency from carrying on with its ongoing inquiry…On Monday, advocate Kalyan Banerjee, who is also one of the petitioners, prayed to the court to direct the CBI to probe the Nandigram incidents. Banerjee submitted that at least 27 people were missing in Nandigram and hence CBI should be directed to carry on investigations. This was also supported by counsel for Association for Protection of Democratic Rights Jaymalya Bagchi. However, this prayer for a fresh probe was turned down.’ So the question is whether the one sees investigating whereabouts of the missing persons fall under ongoing query or part of fresh probe. There were reports yesterday in mainstream media in line with above article (’Nandigram: HC no to continuing CBI probe’, http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=1&theme=&usrsess=1&id=151079) and similar article appeared almost everywhere as well.

]]>