Comments on: The Fourth Anniversary Of The Iraq War http://www.bloggernews.net/15322 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Mon, 28 May 2012 00:14:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: zzsimonb http://www.bloggernews.net/15322#comment-5606 zzsimonb Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:00:18 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/15322#comment-5606 Good catch on the dates. Even BNN makes the ocassional mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. Editor Good catch on the dates. Even BNN makes the ocassional mistake. Thanks for pointing it out.

Editor

]]> By: Steve Real http://www.bloggernews.net/15322#comment-5502 Steve Real Sun, 18 Mar 2007 15:40:29 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/15322#comment-5502 Baghdad belongs to the Baghdadis. It's their country and we are just guest in their land. And everyone knows and realizes this. But the suggestion of prematurely bringing American troops home without a stable Baghdad would make the 1975 Cambodia "Killing Fields" look like an afternoon in the park. Do you really want another Rwanda on your conscience? Because in essence this is what some are advocating for. A proxy war of a religious battle unseen in modern times. Fought between Iran and the Arab world. For Iran wants it's hegemony that stretches from Tehran to Beirut. even so.. Baghdad now has a chance to protect itself. Real street violence is down 40 to 80 percent in parts of Baghdad. And if we can't help stabilize Baghdad then you will have your war that some are so eager to start. And America will be right back in Baghdad to protect the good people. Even the Prophet did not give up on his people. The Most Holy Qur'an as i understand it is not strictly about prayer but a history that tells the tale of how one man brought peace and unity to a war ravage region. This next proxy war that you are so ready to see might not have a Prophet who can unite a people. The Prophet as i understand his words has always advocated for peace through his whole life, even through the bloody times. So for me i will stand with the Baghdadis who are fighting for their freedom. They have suffered enough tyranny and don't you think it's the time to give the people of Baghdad a chance for freedom? 2. It's the fourth anniversary of the war Jason not the fifth. The war started on March 2003 not march 2002. Baghdad belongs to the Baghdadis. It’s their country and we are just guest in their land. And everyone knows and realizes this.

But the suggestion of prematurely bringing American troops home without a stable Baghdad would make the 1975 Cambodia “Killing Fields” look like an afternoon in the park.

Do you really want another Rwanda on your conscience? Because in essence this is what some are advocating for. A proxy war of a religious battle unseen in modern times. Fought between Iran and the Arab world. For Iran wants it’s hegemony that stretches from Tehran to Beirut.

even so.. Baghdad now has a chance to protect itself. Real street violence is down 40 to 80 percent in parts of Baghdad. And if we can’t help stabilize Baghdad then you will have your war that some are so eager to start.

And America will be right back in Baghdad to protect the good people.

Even the Prophet did not give up on his people. The Most Holy Qur’an as i understand it
is not strictly about prayer but a history that tells the tale of how one man brought peace and unity to a war ravage region.

This next proxy war that you are so ready to see might not have a Prophet who can unite a people.

The Prophet as i understand his words has always advocated for peace through his whole life, even through the bloody times.

So for me i will stand with the Baghdadis who are fighting for their freedom. They have suffered enough tyranny and don’t you think it’s the time to give the people of Baghdad a chance for freedom?

2. It’s the fourth anniversary of the war Jason not the fifth. The war started on March 2003 not march 2002.

]]>