<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Pace Leaves Us With A Question</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 18:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul V</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>I am confused. "Commenters are asked to refrain from personal attacks" but this article is a personal attack.
It is suggested, with absolutely NO supporting evidence, that General Pace would compulsively take action against homosexuals.
Also, Whymrhymer skillfully painted a dark picture of "evangelical Christians" most of whom, he claims, cannot keep their personal opinions too themselves. What is so terrible about expressing your opinions? Is that not what gay rights activists do? Is it not what Whymrhymer is doing in this article?
I just don't understand Whymrhymer's perspective....My B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am confused. &#8220;Commenters are asked to refrain from personal attacks&#8221; but this article is a personal attack.<br />
It is suggested, with absolutely NO supporting evidence, that General Pace would compulsively take action against homosexuals.<br />
Also, Whymrhymer skillfully painted a dark picture of &#8220;evangelical Christians&#8221; most of whom, he claims, cannot keep their personal opinions too themselves. What is so terrible about expressing your opinions? Is that not what gay rights activists do? Is it not what Whymrhymer is doing in this article?<br />
I just don&#8217;t understand Whymrhymer&#8217;s perspective&#8230;.My B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Titus</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator>Titus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 16:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3966</guid>
		<description>People need to study history. There is no institution more gay than the military. We have a 9 trillion dollar debt that is almost all military related. We need to stop the military from such flamboyant extravagance. We can't afford this level of manly macho gayness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to study history. There is no institution more gay than the military. We have a 9 trillion dollar debt that is almost all military related. We need to stop the military from such flamboyant extravagance. We can&#8217;t afford this level of manly macho gayness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Payton</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3961</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/15270#comment-3961</guid>
		<description>In spite of what he &lt;i&gt;said&lt;/i&gt;, do you have any evidence that he has taken any &lt;i&gt;actions&lt;/i&gt; against the policy?  There was a big kerfuffle before about Bush-appointed judges; could they hold their religious views in check while interpreting laws they disagreed with?  This was heavily covered, even though one of those judges removed the Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama courthouse, and even though liberal judges, like those in Massachusetts, find new rights or direct their legislatures what laws they must pass.  

All you have now are words of a personal opinion, and you're using that to smear a guy by suggesting his actions would follow.  But you have no evidence of contrary actions.  

Oh, and you do have innuendo.  Lots of innuendo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In spite of what he <i>said</i>, do you have any evidence that he has taken any <i>actions</i> against the policy?  There was a big kerfuffle before about Bush-appointed judges; could they hold their religious views in check while interpreting laws they disagreed with?  This was heavily covered, even though one of those judges removed the Ten Commandments monument from the Alabama courthouse, and even though liberal judges, like those in Massachusetts, find new rights or direct their legislatures what laws they must pass.  </p>
<p>All you have now are words of a personal opinion, and you&#8217;re using that to smear a guy by suggesting his actions would follow.  But you have no evidence of contrary actions.  </p>
<p>Oh, and you do have innuendo.  Lots of innuendo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
