<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Heading for an Ethanol Hangover</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15206</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/15206#comment-3419</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 14:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/15206#comment-3419</guid>
		<description>Many current arguments against ethanol are based on current market conditions.  Let's consider the future potential of ethanol given positive market developments that are very realistic.  These include:  Advancement of cellulosic ethanol research/production; Development of other "hols" with higher energy content; Reduction/elimination of existing big oil subsidies; Optimization of flex fuel engines for ethanol instead of gasoline, thus reducing the performance gap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many current arguments against ethanol are based on current market conditions.  Let&#8217;s consider the future potential of ethanol given positive market developments that are very realistic.  These include:  Advancement of cellulosic ethanol research/production; Development of other &#8220;hols&#8221; with higher energy content; Reduction/elimination of existing big oil subsidies; Optimization of flex fuel engines for ethanol instead of gasoline, thus reducing the performance gap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
