<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Valued Life: Making peace with religion and sexuality</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: peterbroady</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1372</link>
		<dc:creator>peterbroady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 21:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1372</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed this post, for a number of reasons.  One good aspect of it is that just from reading it, one cannot tell whether or not the author is morally opposed to homosexual behavior, just that he suggests that sexual identity therapy could help those struggling with such issues.  I read a short article in Scientific American Mind recently arguing for sexual therapy, and that indeed some people struggling with conflicting feelings could be helped to live a heterosexual lifestyle, if that is what was best for them; I thought it was a good point.  I would only caution that there seems to be no reason, ethically, why everyone should be exclusively heterosexual, especially given the numbers of people who express either exclusive or near-exclusive same-sex desire.  For such people, one would think that a reasonably healthy and happy same-sex relationship would be more appropriate.

The story recounted in this post is also interesting as an illustration of the struggles that bisexuals or people with heterogenous cross-gender desires have with religion and living in society.  Another thing one might object to here is the idea that there is some necessary conflict between being a sort of Christian believer and being a practicing homosexual.  The word 'Christian' is meant in a very specific, ideological way here.  Look at the Christian world today and throughout history, and it is pretty trivial that in order to qualify as a Christian one does not have to believe and/or follow everything written in religious texts and part of the tradition.  If this were the criteria, then there would be no such thing as a Christian.  Every sect and variant of the Christian tradition choose aspects and interpretations of the texts and tradition to emphasize, and others to de-emphasize.  This is true in the case of Jesus of Nazareth even, with respect to the Jewish tradition.  So it is not so clear that being a homosexual, and perhaps going against a literal interpretation of a few passages in religious texts, disqualifies one from being a Christian.  Anyway, that is my opinion as a non-Christian, or perhaps to some a 'secular Christian'.

A big part of the solution to the problem of homosexuality and religion would come, I think, from increased understanding and tolerance, as well as an end to institutional discrimination and coercion, and from a re-examination of both the phenomenology of homosexuality and the tradition of religion.  Perhaps sexual identity therapies could be a part of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed this post, for a number of reasons.  One good aspect of it is that just from reading it, one cannot tell whether or not the author is morally opposed to homosexual behavior, just that he suggests that sexual identity therapy could help those struggling with such issues.  I read a short article in Scientific American Mind recently arguing for sexual therapy, and that indeed some people struggling with conflicting feelings could be helped to live a heterosexual lifestyle, if that is what was best for them; I thought it was a good point.  I would only caution that there seems to be no reason, ethically, why everyone should be exclusively heterosexual, especially given the numbers of people who express either exclusive or near-exclusive same-sex desire.  For such people, one would think that a reasonably healthy and happy same-sex relationship would be more appropriate.</p>
<p>The story recounted in this post is also interesting as an illustration of the struggles that bisexuals or people with heterogenous cross-gender desires have with religion and living in society.  Another thing one might object to here is the idea that there is some necessary conflict between being a sort of Christian believer and being a practicing homosexual.  The word &#8216;Christian&#8217; is meant in a very specific, ideological way here.  Look at the Christian world today and throughout history, and it is pretty trivial that in order to qualify as a Christian one does not have to believe and/or follow everything written in religious texts and part of the tradition.  If this were the criteria, then there would be no such thing as a Christian.  Every sect and variant of the Christian tradition choose aspects and interpretations of the texts and tradition to emphasize, and others to de-emphasize.  This is true in the case of Jesus of Nazareth even, with respect to the Jewish tradition.  So it is not so clear that being a homosexual, and perhaps going against a literal interpretation of a few passages in religious texts, disqualifies one from being a Christian.  Anyway, that is my opinion as a non-Christian, or perhaps to some a &#8217;secular Christian&#8217;.</p>
<p>A big part of the solution to the problem of homosexuality and religion would come, I think, from increased understanding and tolerance, as well as an end to institutional discrimination and coercion, and from a re-examination of both the phenomenology of homosexuality and the tradition of religion.  Perhaps sexual identity therapies could be a part of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Considerettes - Conservative commentary served up in bite-sized bits &#187; Making Peace With Religion and Sexuality</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Considerettes - Conservative commentary served up in bite-sized bits &#187; Making Peace With Religion and Sexuality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>[...] Making Peace With Religion and Sexuality   By Doug Payton A great article on a Christian dealing with homosexual tendencies at Blogger News Network by Warren Throckmorton, PhD, is a must-read. While I think homosexual activity is wrong, this approach to dealing with it in the Christian life makes sense. As I say in a comment to the article, hetero men have the same sexual temptations (aside from the gender), and have to deal with them spiritually and behaviorally. And just because God doesn&#8217;t heal a particular physical problem&#8211;or take away homosexual tendencies&#8211;doesn&#8217;t mean that He can&#8217;t or that we&#8217;re bad people. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Making Peace With Religion and Sexuality   By Doug Payton A great article on a Christian dealing with homosexual tendencies at Blogger News Network by Warren Throckmorton, PhD, is a must-read. While I think homosexual activity is wrong, this approach to dealing with it in the Christian life makes sense. As I say in a comment to the article, hetero men have the same sexual temptations (aside from the gender), and have to deal with them spiritually and behaviorally. And just because God doesn&#8217;t heal a particular physical problem&#8211;or take away homosexual tendencies&#8211;doesn&#8217;t mean that He can&#8217;t or that we&#8217;re bad people. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Payton</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/14299#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Excellent article.  While I believe that homosexual attraction is indeed a "bent", if you will, version of the sexual attraction that God intended, this approach to dealing with it makes sense.  Hetero men can have the same sexual temptations to women not their wife, and it must be dealt with spiritually and behaviorally.  Also, God doesn't necessarily cure us of diseases, but that doesn't necessarily mean He can't or that were therefore bad people.  The temptation isn't the sin; even Jesus was tempted.

Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article.  While I believe that homosexual attraction is indeed a &#8220;bent&#8221;, if you will, version of the sexual attraction that God intended, this approach to dealing with it makes sense.  Hetero men can have the same sexual temptations to women not their wife, and it must be dealt with spiritually and behaviorally.  Also, God doesn&#8217;t necessarily cure us of diseases, but that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean He can&#8217;t or that were therefore bad people.  The temptation isn&#8217;t the sin; even Jesus was tempted.</p>
<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
