… is getting beat-up over his remark that Barack Obama’s appeal is that “you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” because he’s got it exactly right. So far as is known — which is hardly at all — Obama’s political views are waaaay left-of-center, and he’s got hardly any experience of governance. What else is there, then, but the sense that he’s … “like us,” somehow?
He has an education, that is, an engaging family that he seems to enjoy, and speaks in comprehensible sentences. He is reflective, frank about his uncertainties vis-a-vis the Big Questions, comes across as a regular, agreeable sort of guy.
He is, you know … like us.
The reason for the indignation, of course, is that so much of contemporary black leadership, and so much of black culture writ large, are at pains to not be “white,” to display conspicuously their rejection of assimilation into the bourgeoisie values of the white middle class. Obama’s popularity undercuts the very premise of Jesse Jackson’s and Al Sharpton’s race-hustling enterprises: they’re not unpopular with the mainstream because they’re black — they’re unpopular because of their out-of-step values and behavior. Obama is decidedly in-step and, though black, enjoying the rewards denied to Jackson et. al.
Obama’s popularity — like Tiger Woods’, Colin Powell’s, Condoleezza Rice’s, Edward Brooke’s, Ward Connerly’s, Douglas Wilder’s, to name just a handful — points toward the fact that the great divide in American life isn’t race after all: it is culture, though the cultural divide tends to follow racial lines.
Consider this remark about black school students who “act white,” from a study recently released by the Hoover Institution: “I can also be precise about what I mean by acting white: a set of social interactions in which minority adolescents who get good grades in school enjoy less social popularity than white students who do well academically.” The pressure against assimilation into the American mainstream, in other words, commences early. Ironically, this places a lot of black America, including a great many of the so-called black leaders, in practical opposition to the affirmative action initiatives they so vigorously defend.
The very idea of affirmative action is to place blacks in responsible positions where they are role models, so that youngsters in school might be told, “Hey! You could be an astronaut, or a television star, or a mathematics professor at a good university, or … whatever you want to be. Look! They did it.” But by emphasizing and rewarding differentness, that’s been undermined.
I suppose Biden’s critics find it easier to beat on him than to face the reality of the harm their racial opportunism has caused.
Bob Felton
www.CivilCommotion.com














2 users commented in " It’s unfortunate that Joe Biden … "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI commented to Robert vanBruggen in another post about the critique of Obama’s views as being far-left, and out of the center, which is supposed to (and may well, I can’t say) represent the polled opinion of the majority of Americans. Yet it is interesting how narrowly defined the spectrum is, here, that someone like Obama would be critiqued (not just pointed out rightly) as a far-left candidate. In terms of political philosophy and the history of political ideology, Obama is in many ways a moderate or conservative. If you consider his call for universal health-care, for instance, fanatical or dangerously left-leaning, you make this judgment on the basis of the cultural values of the richest and most powerful elements of our own society, not necessarily on any rational grounds. It is really hard to see how decent universal health care would not be the benefit of most Americans, especially those who are most in need of that benefit (this is the basic idea of justice). The only people it might not benefit are people who are wealthy and able to afford their own health care, and we hardly have an obligation to serve such people, who are doing fine on their own and really couldn’t use the benefits of government help. We need to have, as a nation and thus in the realms of the elite media and the circles of the wealthy and powerful, a detailed and informed discussion of who the official ideology is intended to serve. Does it primarily serve the wealthy, those who are not in need of service to live decent and productive lives, or does it serve those who may for whatever reason need service to live minimally decent lives. I think the answer, when it comes to nearly all governments throughout history including ours, is clear enough: it serves the wealthy.
Also, I think most supporters of Obama (among which I can’t say I include myself yet) are aware of his ‘leftist’ ideas; he has made no secret of them.
[…] Second in the “with friends like this, who needs enemies” department, we have Bob Felton Obama’s political views are waaaay left-of-center, […]
Leave A Reply