Comments on: The Duke case and interracial rape http://www.bloggernews.net/13846 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Thu, 08 Jan 2009 03:33:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: POLSKAX http://www.bloggernews.net/13846#comment-82384 POLSKAX Sat, 01 Sep 2007 19:04:30 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/13846#comment-82384 The figures are similar in Europe, though it's harder to get holder of official interracial crime stats as I guess some people don't want us to know. Some people use the lame excuse to explain the stats by claiming non-whites are more likely rape, murder and attack whites in the USA and Europe as there are more whites than non-whites,and thus more potential victims for the non-white rapist/killer/racist. Which is absurd and laughable, of course. If this theory had even a shred of validity, it would be the case that there would be more white on black rapes in Harlem or Compton in the US or the ghettoes of Paris and London that the reverse. Which anyone with any brain left unwashed knows is 180 degrees from the reality. Also, they try to explain it by saying there are more white criminals and crimes than black. Another horrendous faliure to understand per capita figures. Also, the indiviudal above says the stats are skewed as they merely mean blacks are more likely to be PROSECUTED for rape than whites. Also, the percentage and absolute number of 'white' rapists is distorted by Hispanics being counted as white. As the Hispanic community in general shows generally higher levels of serious criminality than white ones, an intellgent person would realise that 'white' rapists, killer and criminals are almost certainly massively fewer than the stats suggest. The figures are similar in Europe, though it’s harder to get holder of official interracial crime stats as I guess some people don’t want us to know.

Some people use the lame excuse to explain the stats by claiming non-whites are more likely rape, murder and attack whites in the USA and Europe as there are more whites than non-whites,and thus more potential victims for the non-white rapist/killer/racist.

Which is absurd and laughable, of course. If this theory had even a shred of validity, it would be the case that there would be more white on black rapes in Harlem or Compton in the US or the ghettoes of Paris and London that the reverse.

Which anyone with any brain left unwashed knows is 180 degrees from the reality.

Also, they try to explain it by saying there are more white criminals and crimes than black. Another horrendous faliure to understand per capita figures.

Also, the indiviudal above says the stats are skewed as they merely mean blacks are more likely to be PROSECUTED for rape than whites.

Also, the percentage and absolute number of ‘white’ rapists is distorted by Hispanics being counted as white. As the Hispanic community in general shows generally higher levels of serious criminality than white ones, an intellgent person would realise that ‘white’ rapists, killer and criminals are almost certainly massively fewer than the stats suggest.

]]> By: John http://www.bloggernews.net/13846#comment-1268 John Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:15:28 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/13846#comment-1268 Stix's figures are false, as are the claims in his original source, Jared Taylor. The Justice Department has consistently reported that in about 88 percent of forcible rape cases, the victim and offender are of the same race. The numbers you cite do not square with those from the National Incident-Based Reporting System. The percentage of reports of forcible rapes by both black and white women relative to the total of all reported rapes is higher than their percentage in the population -- rounding off, 81 percent of rape reports are by white women, 19 percent by black women, only 1 percent reported by other races. The overall population is 74 percent white, 12 percent black. This means we have a rape "reporting" problem, and that reports are not consistent with the likely pattern of actual rapes in the general population. Stix's numbers simply do not add up as compared with Justice Department statistics. Moreover, blacks are much more likely to be PROSECUTED for rape than whites, as compared to the overall number of reported rapes by race. The source Taylor uses is decades old, does not account for Justice Department statistics, and does not agree with the "conclusions," if you can call them that, that Taylor comes to. That is, Taylor's work is a fabrication. Then again, so is Stix's. Regarding the National Crime Victimization Survey, it would be better to go to the raw data rather than to rely on people who are out to prove, by any means necessary, that blacks are a violent race bent on destroying whites. That's Stix's agenda. The citations in Stix, Taylor, and Parker are non-existent, as the data are not packaged in the years Parker, Taylor, and Stix cite, and the sample sizes do not allow us to draw valid statistical conclusions. This fundamental truth is barely refected in Parker, twisted mightily in Taylor, and utterly mutilated in Stix. If you doubt this, consider that Stix is the same person who alleges that after Hurricane Katrina, roving bands of blacks went on search-and-destroy missions hunting down and murdering whites. This, he alleges, accounts for the fact that roughly 40 percent of those who died in New Orleans during Katrina were white. That's at least several hundred murders of whites by blacks he alleges happened. Here's where he said it: http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/08/30/new-orleans-times-picayune-reporters-editors-win-duranty-blair-award-for-journalistic-infamy-2/#comments And here's the quotation: Given that supposedly only 10 percent or less of the people left in town were white, and over forty percent of the dead were white, whites were dying at over four times their proportion. And that doesnt even take into consideration that whites were reportedly concentrated in “safer” places. Thus, I am convinced that blacks were on search-and-destroy missions, hunting down and murdering whites. Nicholas Stix is a fabricator of the worst order, bent on proving his outlandish theory that blacks constantly threaten violence against whites. Stix’s figures are false, as are the claims in his original source, Jared Taylor. The Justice Department has consistently reported that in about 88 percent of forcible rape cases, the victim and offender are of the same race. The numbers you cite do not square with those from the National Incident-Based Reporting System. The percentage of reports of forcible rapes by both black and white women relative to the total of all reported rapes is higher than their percentage in the population — rounding off, 81 percent of rape reports are by white women, 19 percent by black women, only 1 percent reported by other races. The overall population is 74 percent white, 12 percent black. This means we have a rape “reporting” problem, and that reports are not consistent with the likely pattern of actual rapes in the general population. Stix’s numbers simply do not add up as compared with Justice Department statistics. Moreover, blacks are much more likely to be PROSECUTED for rape than whites, as compared to the overall number of reported rapes by race. The source Taylor uses is decades old, does not account for Justice Department statistics, and does not agree with the “conclusions,” if you can call them that, that Taylor comes to. That is, Taylor’s work is a fabrication. Then again, so is Stix’s.

Regarding the National Crime Victimization Survey, it would be better to go to the raw data rather than to rely on people who are out to prove, by any means necessary, that blacks are a violent race bent on destroying whites. That’s Stix’s agenda. The citations in Stix, Taylor, and Parker are non-existent, as the data are not packaged in the years Parker, Taylor, and Stix cite, and the sample sizes do not allow us to draw valid statistical conclusions. This fundamental truth is barely refected in Parker, twisted mightily in Taylor, and utterly mutilated in Stix.

If you doubt this, consider that Stix is the same person who alleges that after Hurricane Katrina, roving bands of blacks went on search-and-destroy missions hunting down and murdering whites. This, he alleges, accounts for the fact that roughly 40 percent of those who died in New Orleans during Katrina were white. That’s at least several hundred murders of whites by blacks he alleges happened.

Here’s where he said it: http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/08/30/new-orleans-times-picayune-reporters-editors-win-duranty-blair-award-for-journalistic-infamy-2/#comments

And here’s the quotation:

Given that supposedly only 10 percent or less of the people left in town were white, and over forty percent of the dead were white, whites were dying at over four times their proportion. And that doesnt even take into consideration that whites were reportedly concentrated in “safer” places. Thus, I am convinced that blacks were on search-and-destroy missions, hunting down and murdering whites.

Nicholas Stix is a fabricator of the worst order, bent on proving his outlandish theory that blacks constantly threaten violence against whites.

]]>