The poster of this article makes no sense, and I would be quite weary of his real intentions for writing this article. The article is spin, propaganda and misrepresentation of Black males.

Maybe White rapists even fear Black women due to other stereotypes about Blacks! I do not understand the point of this article at all.

The above COMMENT is spin, propaganda and misrepresentation of Black males. This person has been washed in the blood of the liberal media to deny, confuse, and change the subject anytime something may be said that doesn’t jibe with P.C. sensibilities.

If one has a preference for their own kind they are racist?? Grow up junior. Get out of the suburbs and the sociology class once in a while and form your own opinions and quit parroting the common hype just to fit in.

What difference does the race of the victim make? I don’t know, ask Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. I think that is the point being made.

As far as rapists go I think they should all be killed, regardless of race. If it were up to us white people they would be, because whites don’t identify with each other by race over everything else. We don’t call rapists and murderers, brother, just because we share a common skin color.

As far as the blacks are a violent race theory, I think that is proven by the fact that 13% of the population commits approximately 55% of the murders. Oh wait, that is caused by socio-economic injustices, and bad childhoods. Or maybe it’s just because blacks are more likely to be PROSECUTED for murder.

So, in review, deny, obfuscate, and change the subject. Put words all in caps to emphasize the EFFECT, instead of the cause, and repeat it over and over until it becomes true.

The poster of this article makes no sense, and I would be quite weary of his real intentions for writing this article. The article is spin, propaganda and misrepresentation of Black males.

Maybe White rapists even fear Black women due to other stereotypes about Blacks! I do not understand the point of this article at all.

The poster of this article makes no sense, and I would be quite weary of his real intentions here. The article is about spin, propaganda and misrepresentation of Black males.

Maybe said rapists even slightly fear Black women due to another myth built up by a White media, the aggressive or ’scary Black person’

The point is I fail to

Some people use the lame excuse to explain the stats by claiming non-whites are more likely rape, murder and attack whites in the USA and Europe as there are more whites than non-whites,and thus more potential victims for the non-white rapist/killer/racist.

Which is absurd and laughable, of course. If this theory had even a shred of validity, it would be the case that there would be more white on black rapes in Harlem or Compton in the US or the ghettoes of Paris and London that the reverse.

Which anyone with any brain left unwashed knows is 180 degrees from the reality.

Also, they try to explain it by saying there are more white criminals and crimes than black. Another horrendous faliure to understand per capita figures.

Also, the indiviudal above says the stats are skewed as they merely mean blacks are more likely to be PROSECUTED for rape than whites.

Also, the percentage and absolute number of ‘white’ rapists is distorted by Hispanics being counted as white. As the Hispanic community in general shows generally higher levels of serious criminality than white ones, an intellgent person would realise that ‘white’ rapists, killer and criminals are almost certainly massively fewer than the stats suggest.

Regarding the National Crime Victimization Survey, it would be better to go to the raw data rather than to rely on people who are out to prove, by any means necessary, that blacks are a violent race bent on destroying whites. That’s Stix’s agenda. The citations in Stix, Taylor, and Parker are non-existent, as the data are not packaged in the years Parker, Taylor, and Stix cite, and the sample sizes do not allow us to draw valid statistical conclusions. This fundamental truth is barely refected in Parker, twisted mightily in Taylor, and utterly mutilated in Stix.

If you doubt this, consider that Stix is the same person who alleges that after Hurricane Katrina, roving bands of blacks went on search-and-destroy missions hunting down and murdering whites. This, he alleges, accounts for the fact that roughly 40 percent of those who died in New Orleans during Katrina were white. That’s at least several hundred murders of whites by blacks he alleges happened.

Here’s where he said it: http://mensnewsdaily.com/2006/08/30/new-orleans-times-picayune-reporters-editors-win-duranty-blair-award-for-journalistic-infamy-2/#comments

And here’s the quotation:

Given that supposedly only 10 percent or less of the people left in town were white, and over forty percent of the dead were white, whites were dying at over four times their proportion. And that doesnt even take into consideration that whites were reportedly concentrated in “safer” places. Thus, I am convinced that blacks were on search-and-destroy missions, hunting down and murdering whites.

Nicholas Stix is a fabricator of the worst order, bent on proving his outlandish theory that blacks constantly threaten violence against whites.