<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leak of Israel&#8217;s Plans to Nuke Iran Smell Like BS</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/13634</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 01:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ip &#62;short for insane_pschiatrist</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/13634#comment-9847</link>
		<dc:creator>ip &#62;short for insane_pschiatrist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/13634#comment-9847</guid>
		<description>i predict israel will goto war in april, with someone to the east of them, cant say,  but on wednesday in april the games will begin. lets hope im wrong, but highly unlikely.
if im right the un will soon see an end to their lolligagging,  and the middle east will be in turmoil for quiet a while, again. the fact that fingers pointing to who leaked it , is useless, either way if it were israel, it was a scare tactic, if it were iran, it was a move to warn the un, but it doesnt matter if the un hears about it, they dont do anything, but sit around and suck up us tax dollars. so " let the games begin" by the way, a nuked iran would be a better iran, but when can we nuke nkorea? and pakistan and saudi arabia and syria and jordan and egypt, but not in that order&#62;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i predict israel will goto war in april, with someone to the east of them, cant say,  but on wednesday in april the games will begin. lets hope im wrong, but highly unlikely.<br />
if im right the un will soon see an end to their lolligagging,  and the middle east will be in turmoil for quiet a while, again. the fact that fingers pointing to who leaked it , is useless, either way if it were israel, it was a scare tactic, if it were iran, it was a move to warn the un, but it doesnt matter if the un hears about it, they dont do anything, but sit around and suck up us tax dollars. so &#8221; let the games begin&#8221; by the way, a nuked iran would be a better iran, but when can we nuke nkorea? and pakistan and saudi arabia and syria and jordan and egypt, but not in that order&gt;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert VerBruggen</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/13634#comment-1084</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert VerBruggen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 03:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/13634#comment-1084</guid>
		<description>"A tactical nuclear weapon would likely do very little for a protected underground bunker."

Then why are they called "bunker-busters"? I'm no expert on this very specific situation, but by and large tactical nukes of the bunker-buster variety are indeed meant for "a protected underground bunker."

From the story:

"Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear 'bunker-busters', according to several Israeli military sources."

Some info on bunker-busters: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bunker_buster

(Money quote from Wikipedia: "These weapons would be used to destroy hardened, underground military bunkers buried deep in the ground.")

Also, the story is specifically attributed to sources in the Israeli military. Unless the publication is lying, or those sources are Iranian spies, you're wrong in positing the leak was from Iranian sources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A tactical nuclear weapon would likely do very little for a protected underground bunker.&#8221;</p>
<p>Then why are they called &#8220;bunker-busters&#8221;? I&#8217;m no expert on this very specific situation, but by and large tactical nukes of the bunker-buster variety are indeed meant for &#8220;a protected underground bunker.&#8221;</p>
<p>From the story:</p>
<p>&#8220;Two Israeli air force squadrons are training to blow up an Iranian facility using low-yield nuclear &#8216;bunker-busters&#8217;, according to several Israeli military sources.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some info on bunker-busters: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bunker_buster" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_bunker_buster</a></p>
<p>(Money quote from Wikipedia: &#8220;These weapons would be used to destroy hardened, underground military bunkers buried deep in the ground.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Also, the story is specifically attributed to sources in the Israeli military. Unless the publication is lying, or those sources are Iranian spies, you&#8217;re wrong in positing the leak was from Iranian sources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
