Have you been dealing with a chronic or permanent disease for which your health care practitioner claims there is no cure? Do you take medication which does nothing more than make the symptoms bearable, yet does not actually do anything to cure the problem. If you fit into this category and this has been on your mind, I highly recommend you take a few things into consideration before blindly putting your faith into a physician.
You might notice a lack of sources for my blog but before discounting my experience, I would like to preface my article by telling you that I suffer from a chronic disease, that I have worked in a medical office, and that I am a doctor’s son. My personal experience in battling ulcerative colitis has made me distrustful of medical professionals. I have been on a perscription drug for about five years now which has caused me minor hair loss, toxins in my kidneys, and taken God knows how much money so that I could afford to keep taking these pills. All the information given to me about this medication was from the drug company, who is obviously a bit biased and therefore will be suttle about the side effects. The doctor who I trusted for years, one of the highest ranking gastroenterologists in Arizona, assured me that I would probably be taking these pills for the rest of my life. He gave me very little information about how my diet could affect my condition, he didn’t tell me much about the physiological cause or effect of my disease, and when I asked him about how my condition would interact with a malaria medication, he claimed that he couldn’t tell me because it “wasn’t his specialty.” When I asked him to get his little, blue drug medical book and explain it to me in layman’s terms, he threw his hands in the air like I was putting him out. The truth was that he had the means to figure out the drug interaction, he just didn’t want to be bothered about it.
I changed doctors after this and met a man who has been eager to help me, has made recommendations other than “take more pills” as my other doctor had said, and, in contradiction to what my former healthcare practitioner had claimed, he told me if he were in my position, he would be trying to get of the pills as well. I still take the pills and I realize that I will have to have patience with my disease. However, I have been on the internet researching this disease, what causes it, how to curb the symptoms, and what the medication can do to an individual (from sources other than the drug company). I have turned to diet changes, acupuncture, Chinese herbs, and exercise, things which have helped me considerably and were never suggested by my former doctor.
My point is this: in order to find a sanctuary of health within American medicine, you must do the research yourself. Read some medical journals, get on-line, join a support group, or look into alternative medicine. Healthcare, while effective in some cases and not so effective in others, is a business, not a humanitarian service. Doctors want to make money like anybody else and if they can continue to collect from your insurance company (provided you are fortunate enough to have insurance), it might not matter to them if your health improves. Aside from their desire to keep a good reputation, you are more valuble to doctors and drug companies sick than healthy. I’m not saying abandon modern medicine altogether, I’m just suggesting that you find a doctor you trust. Know the right questions to ask this person analyzing your body. If you ask a question that your doctor is unable or unwilling to find the answer to, then it’s time to drop him. Healthcare in our country is simply to expensive to be received poorly.
Search out all the alternatives and learn whatever you can. Some doctors will tell you that alternative medicine is a sham because they have either been trained to believe this or because they fear the competition it brings to their practice. These people went through eight years of education and several years of internships, so they believe they have earned the right to have an ego. They generally don’t like being questioned or proven wrong. But they are not divine, they are human like you and I and if you forget to trust yourself about your own body, you might end up dependant on your doctor for the rest of your life when you could have found a solution years before. I wish I had been brave enough to adopt this mode of thinking in younger years, for I might not still be battling Ulcerative Colitis to the extent that I am today.















4 users commented in " Trusting Yourself Over Medical Professionals "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackJonas, I applaud you fr having the courage and initiative to take charge of your own health. If I had listened to my primary care physician, a cardiologist she referred me to and a cardiothoracic surgeon he had me see right after an angiogram, I would have had a quintuple bypass two days after the consultation. That’s how quickley they want to crack my chest open and do a quintuple coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) to treat my coronary artery disease (CAD). “Your heart is in great shape,” I was told, “But you have two arteries that are 100% occluded and three that are more than 85% blocked.” When I told them I wanted to think about it, I was told, “You are a walking time bomb. You could have aheart attack, stroke, or worse within a few days or a few months at most.”
“Well, if it is the job of the coronary arteries to supply my heart with oxygen, how can my heart be in ‘great’ shape?” I asked. None of these three doctors could or would give me an answer. I told them I would get a second opinion. I did and am still alive and kicking, lousy coronary arteries and all. I haven’t lived three months longer than predicted, it’s been nearly three years and my angina has been successfully brought under control with medication,, not a scapel.
A year after being told I was a walking time bomb, I made an appointment to see the cardiologist who called me a “walking time bomb in May 2004. I said, “Hey, doctor. Here I a, no more angina and I feel great.” He was astounded. “I guess the walking time bomb was a dud, huh Doc?” I said. He just smiled and I retorted, “Perhaps my doctors were duds, doc, perhaps my doctors were.
Check out my blog for more information on my adventures in medicine: http://wordworks2001.blogspot.com.
Ah, yes. All doctors are assholes because they are not Jesus Christ and can’t cure my disease.
Sorry to tell you this, but we only have certain tools. We do not have good treatment for Ulcerative colitis, but I can tell you that fifty years ago it was considered “psychosomatic” and they gave people tranquillizers. Then they discovered it was the body making antibodies against itself. But since emotions affect the immune system, stress makes it worse, but a good diet and positive outcome decrease the stress hormones and improve the disease.
So having a positive outlook will help and even cure you. Good. However, that leaves me stuck with the people whose lives read like a soap opera, whose colitis is complicated by drunken husbands, children who were killed in accidents, raising the grandchildren of their dead children, living in poverty, trying to make ends meet, etc. on top of the colitis.
But then I’ve never worked with well balanced, healthy middle class people who are educated enough to take responsibility for their health. So stay away from doctors. we have too many of the other types keeping us busy.
As for coronary arteries, I date before cardiac surgery. They did a VA study comparing surgery vs medicines twenty years ago, and for half the people it made no difference.
But the other half developed severe angina that limited their lives, and many ended up with surgery and others died.
So I’m happy when “No treatment” works. But remember: For half of the people, it doesn’t work. And if you persuade them to not have surgery and they die, YOU won’t be sued for malpractice.
Dr. Reyes, this isn’t the first time you’ve cited a VA study. Would you please provide us with a website URL where we can learn more about this purported VA study?
I suspect Dr. Reyes will be about as forthcoming answering my challenge as she was when she mentioned another VA study she was unable to cite. Let me help her out:
Twenty-two Year Follow-up in the VA Cooperative Study of Coronary artery bypass surgery for Stable Angina. Peduzzi, P, Kamina A, Detrie, K, American Journal of Cardiology. 1998; 81; 1393-1399.
Between 1972 and 1974 354 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease were assigned to conservative medical treatment and 332 with similar symptomatic coronary artery disease were assigned to surgical revascularization. The overall 22 year cumulative survival rate for the medically treated group was 25% while it was 20% in the surgically treated group. The probability of being free of heart attack was significantly higher in the medically treated group (57% vs. 41%). The authors conclude that the trial “provides strong evidence” that initial bypass surgery does not improve survival or reduce the overall risk of a future heart attack. On the contrary, invasively treated patients were much more likely to suffer a heart attack or die compared to patients who are not treated surgically.
As you can see, the good doctor also got her facts wrong. I hope she wasn’t as sloppy when she treated patients.
Leave A Reply