It was another fun packed day in Judge Perry’s courtroom. Another day of dealing with the Frye questions. For the most part it was a yawn inducing event. It was a day of the ‘now’ common audio and visual problems that people have come to accept as just part of the process.
Personally I feel that hours of listening to arguments about the likely root growth rate of some unknown plant gets rather boring. I sought my information elsewhere. For the past couple of court appearances the defense has used a new babysitter for Casey Anthony during the time when all of the lawyers are squabbling at Judge Perry’s bench. One wonders what the billing rate for babysitting is?
I do not know his name, I just call him The Pillsbury Dough Boy. As this picture shows, he is very good at his task, one can only assume that he is showing Casey the latest viral YouTube video.
Obviously The Pillsbury Dough Boy did a great job. A little later a new babysitter took over.
But where was the Pillsbury Dough Boy? Well, he had been elevated in status. He was with Jose Baez on the floor of the court.
It is very clear that Jose Baez is a ‘wired’ lawyer, but this is the first time I have seen one bring a helper along just to check his Twitter and Facebook traffic while talking to the judge.
Part of Jose Baez’s presentation was a slide show. Alas I do not have a copy of the slide (yet) but unless I am very much mistaken, some one made a huge boo boo, I do hope that it wasn’t the Pillsbury Dough Boy, he will be relegated back to babysitting duty!
The ‘legal root canal’ is set to resume on Friday. I can hardly wait!
Simon Barrett
20 users commented in " Casey Anthony – Jose Baez Promotes The Pillsbury Dough Boy And Invents A New Word? "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackbackwhat is the “boo boo” i’ve been reviewing the “slide show” and don’t see it.
I don’t know if the video is out yet. But it seems to me that Casey and Baez got into some kind of quarrel this morning. Then he talked to Cindy after that. All day today Casey seemed distant from Baez and didn’t look to happy with him at all. She even tried staying awake like the rest of us. At one point it looked as though she didn’t want to keep this going. One has to wonder what that quarrel was about. Maybe one of them wanting to plea out and the other said no way???? The demeanor (spelling) today was like no other. Usually they are both all smiles, giggling, laughing, smirks, flipping off the camera, sticking tongue out at the camera. That was on Friday that, that took place. The point is, they weren’t their usual selves today.
No matter what, I still feel Baez is not in this for Casey’s best interest. He’s in it for the blood money after the trial is over.
What made me laugh today was the fact that Baez has the gall to put down Dr. Vass left and right. Yet his so called “Experts” aren’t even experts. They have no hands on, they even admitted to not being experts and they only got info from reading what Dr. Vass put out. Yet, in Baez’s eyes, Dr. Vass is considered junk opnionated science. SERIOUSLY Baez???? LMAO too funny. 31 days, and only then it was Cindy who called, and she still didn’t want to talk to dispatch, tattoos, parties, pole dancing, buying booze and watching movies, lying to everyone. putting trash in the trunk to make it seem like it was the trash that made the smell. This is just a small piece of what jurors will not get over when they convict her. Even if it were an accident and she got scared, She still didn’t call after 31 days and whatever Baez claims of her innocence when he does his opening, nothing will explain any of that and the so called Zanny the Nanny that he keeps forgetting about.
Analysis, analysis, analysis, analysis, analysis. Oh, yea, put that Ananlysis right up there in big letters.
Paw, if Baez & Casey “quarreled”, it was probably over her flipping the bird to the cameraman in court, after she’d motioned for Baez to move over to block the cameraman’s view, which he satisfied her with, & then he turned to stick his tongue out…yeah, with all the blogging done on it the other day, I’m gonna take an edumacated guess & say that might be it. Casey was sulking. Thank Goodness there weren’t any toddlers around that she could sadistically & vindictively remove & kill like she did Caylee in retaliation. jmo
Hi, Simon!
Great article! Love your sense of humor. LMAO!
I immediately noticed “Analysis” was misspelled . . . in big huge letters for all of the world to see!
Yes, if Dough Boy was responsible for that,he will get a demotion. Maybe he’ll be demoted from Casey’s babysitter to going to the snack bar to get Baez some “Red Bull!” Little errand boy! LOL
Simon, I enjoy everything that you do. Thanks. Maybe Casey and Baez had a lovers’ quarrel.
Hopefully Jose Baez did not prepare the PowerPoint slides…it would just confirm my belief that he is not at all intelligent. The word its was spelled as a contraction. This is basic grammar….just as basic as Casey killed Caylee.
Loved the article! Paw69 you are right non as usual! Her days are numbered…..
Simon
I really had to stop and read as to which Pilllsbury Dough Boy you were refering to. That is priceless. LMAO
I noticed the analysis spelled wrong too LOL.
I think Casey was bitching to Jose about her outfit. What a mess that was lol. I think she sent Jose over to tell Spindy as I believe she picks out her clothes.
I think its Spindy’s small way of getting back at Casey.
oh yeah – I thought you were referring to Jose as the Pillsbury Dough Boy! lol
We are getting closer to Justice for Caylee, what surprise will we see nex. Bozo has claime he will explain everything in his opening statement with in a couplle of minutes, really he has had over 2 years why allow Casey to rot in jail if he knew anything that could have helped get her out.
I think hip boots will be a requirement for Court atire.
Yes the clock is ticking and the defence is still at the bottom of the barrel, deciding which way to turn. What do we do who do we blame, what story do we tell. Hard to come up with a story when they can not be truthful.
Personally I think Casey was told to keep her hands off of Bozo and stop the touchy feely. There have been so many comments about their close interaction that is very inappropriate between a attorney and client. I have personally never seen a case where the client and a attorney have carried on like this.
I have to repost this here. Too funny not to. LMAO
This is too funny! Snipped for a laugh! Spacely Here is the way I feel about the opinion of amatuer searchers who didn’t find anything and feel that their results must support their theory that the body was not there: On my way to bed last night, I walked past my washing machine. I looked to be sure that no clothes were in it as I hate for any wet laundry to sit overnight. There were none. So, I assumed that meant I had clean clothes ready for the next day. When I got up this morning, there were no clothes hanging up ready for me. After some more searching, I discovered my clothes were in the dryer. I searched in the laundry area last night and there were no clothes to be found… until I opened the dryer this morning. In my opinion, Kronk kidnapped my clothing after the wash cycle and returned it last night to my dryer. It’s the only possible explanation. I have stated it, so it must be true. His ex-wives have all testified that he did wear clothes while he was in relationships with them. He even told one of their sons more than a month ago that he planned to wear a shirt and pants today. I don’t believe the police have ever investigated this, so I am bringing it to the judge’s attention because the police should not have to rely on me to find this kind of evidence. He also plays some kind of demented computer game where all the characters wear clothes. He slips his headphones on and you can’t get his attention again unless you start a rinse cycle. His credit card receipts also prove he has been buying laundry detergent and dryer sheets steadily for years. His co-workers have all testified that he often carries an assortment of coins the same size and shape as those that fit into most laundrymat machines. http://niecey456.wordpress.com/2009/12/16/does-joy-wray-really-know-anything/
I saw the ‘misspelling immediately on the ‘power point’ display. As I said in a forum post..wouldn’t you think a defense attorney in a DP case would at least have correct spelling in a document presented in court. I will repeat the rest of my forum post ….This is only one of the things I’ve seen that proves the ineptness of ‘officers of the court’ the duhfense is.
PAW69: The correct term is ‘GALL’…not ‘gull’!!
I also noticed the misspelling of ‘analysis’, immediately, and couldn’t believe it wasn’t corrected before presented to the court (and all the world)! Baez should save his breath for the trial—no way is Vass NOT going to testify. But….just the tapes of her mother AND father telling the detectives they BOTH thought the smell was of a dead body and that at least one cadaver dog zeroed in on the scent of a dead body, just may be the nails in Casey’s coffin.
Sorry Jean for my typo. I’m not perfect and was in a hurry.
Jan, could you do me a favor and fix my typo please? Thank You.
I got it for you. Oh and don’t feel bad I do that kind of stuff all the time. At least it wasn’t put in front of a judge to see, not to mention the whole world. LOL In fact I had to search to find it myself 🙂
Jan Barrett
gall? gull? makes no difference to me…I knew what your point was and that was my focus. Kinda like you say “tomatoe”….I say “tomoto” theory….I loved the laundry scenario! too funny! Great post Paw69.
Leave A Reply