Ho hum! The usual nonsense below. We get it with great frequency. Stock answer: It is mostly poor people who live near major roads and the poor have worse health generally.
I could not see the paper in Barnett’s publication list at the time of writing so apparently has yet to undergo peer review. I would gladly review it! He and I both have a background in statistics and I have a background in social class research as well.
So his research is hard to evaluate at this stage but I am pleased to note that he undertook some control for socio-economic status. Social status and income are far from perfectly correlated, however. Plumbers and electricians, for instance, tend to have relatively low status but often have high incomes
Women who live near freeways and highways are more likely to give birth prematurely, new research suggests. The link between the concentration of major road routes around a woman’s home and early birth is revealed in a study of 970 mothers and their newborn babies in Logan City, south of Brisbane.
The more freeways and highways around a pregnant woman’s home, the higher the likelihood of an early delivery, says Associate Professor Adrian Barnett, from the Queensland University of Technology’s Institute of Health and Biomedical
Innovation. “The most striking result was the reduction in gestation time of 4.4 per cent – or almost two weeks – associated with an increase in freeways within 400 metres of the women’s home,” he said.
Prof Barnett has previously published a study that found a strong association between increased air pollution and small foetus size.
“Although the increased risks are relatively small, the public health implications are large because everyone living in an urban area gets exposed to air pollution,” he said. “Pre-term and low-birth weight babies stay in hospital longer after birth, have an increased risk of death and are more likely to develop disabilities.”
Prof Barnett said that while air pollution levels in southeast Queensland were low compared with industrial cities, people’s exposure to the chemical toxins in vehicle emissions was relatively high because of our outdoor lifestyle and open houses.
The study counted the number of roads around the mothers’ homes up to a 500-metre radius. “We examined the distance between the home and busy roads to find the distance at which most of the negative effects on birth outcomes occurred because this has implications for local governments planning expansions or new roads,” he said.
Most of the effects were within a 200-metre radius but negative health effects were present up to 400 metres.
Prof Barnett said the study had also taken into account the effects of smoking levels and the socio-economic status of the mothers. The effects of noise pollution were considered to be a possible contributing factor but Prof Barnett said it was difficult to separate the effects of air and noise pollution.
“Vehicles braking and starting means that road junctions have some of the highest levels of noise and air pollution,” he said. “Disturbed sleep during pregnancy may cause extra stress and be a risk factor for adverse birth outcomes.
“This study points to the fact that pregnant women should reduce their exposure to traffic. A reduction in traffic emissions through improved vehicles or increased public transport use would have immediate health benefits by giving children a better start to life.”
Posted by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.). For a daily critique of Leftist activities, see DISSECTING LEFTISM. To keep up with attacks on free speech see TONGUE-TIED. Also, don’t forget your daily roundup of pro-environment but anti-Greenie news and commentary at GREENIE WATCH . Email me here