In many cases IQ scores are manipulated and its not scientific at all, the western and east Asian countries are prosperous to certain degree and they lay emphasis on minimum basic education for all its citizens which includes familiarity with modern world and use of technology, hence they may demonstrate better IQ score in some circumstances.

Dalit or the lowest castes are concentrated in Northwest and North and the gradient become smaller as one goes east or south (32% in Punjab and Haryana, 21% in Uttar Pradesh and so on). Indian lower and lowest castes are infact much more (fully caucasoid) while upper castes have a lot of Australoid blood. All the studies showing Europeans similar to upper castes are bunk, a pice of b******t.

In early days of English empire in India, Alexnader cunningham located some decendents of Assyrian Aryans in India. He called them pre Aryans. They are a dalit caste (untouchable tribe). The lowest castes of India are decendents of Scythians, Assyrians, Huns and Amorites exclusively who eneterd broadly for the sake of Buddhism and have very high R1a ancestory. It was only with rise of colonialism English decided to invent a new story which fails every test of genetics, linguists, archaelogy and anthropology. Regarding the decandence of these mighty once races into their status, it is natural course of time. They lost their status more than 2500 years ago everywhere.

Think, not “suppose”, along the common sense and worldwide evidences, I may suggest?

On India IQ – the biggest lemon being sold to the world in recent time to accommodate and justify Indian mass immigration to the US, Canada, Australia and Europa.

“High Caste” Brahmins home towns in India, where most of world’s Brahmins live, are like Lagos of Sub-Sahara. No high IQers would live like that, not even by force. This is not due to oppressions of Communism like those in former East Germany, China or North Korea. India has been FREE since Day 1. What happened if they were self-proclaimed “high” IQ? It’s not poverty in those Brahamin home “cities”, but sheer filth and chaos they manage to create. In Comparison, North Koreans are more impoverished yet they keep thier cities clean. Despite being boycotted by the whole world in n-tech( China included) and all other tech, North Korean intellectual elites built N-bomb and it sdelivery system on their own without any help ; yet their counter parts in India, even with all the finance and academic connections to the Western world, could not build it on their own but depending almost entirely on a leaked and second-hand Canadian civil nuclear techonology….

Indian “Castes” made sense in the underlying IQ hierachy thousands of years ago in the very beginning before race-mixing, not any more. A recent research indicates that contrary to previous belief of North-south India divide ( North: lighter Cacausoid, South: darker Dravidian), modern Indians are in fact fairly HOMOGENOUS at sub-continental level(google these key words, I forget the name of the paper), hence their IQ likely follow suit as well. A simple test is to randomly pick an Indian in a crowded Indian street, you can’t tell he/she is Brahmins or other “high” castes or not by appearance as many Brahmins have very dark skins, yet one can tell with 100% arccuracy by appearance that he/she is, and they are all for that matter, of Indian/South Asian origin.

On China IQ: (“And from what I can gather most of the IQ testing has been done on Chinese from the coastal cities. Deep inland in rural China the IQ picture will probably be much different”)

If it is true, then it can’t explain these FACTS:

1. Singapore Chinese IQ > 105. Singapore Chinese are from Malaysian Chinese lot whose grand parents were by and large landless peasants from rural China (logically with below average IQ) who immigrated to the SE Asian several geenrations ago. it shows that rural China’s IQ could not be that different from the coastal areas.

2. The average IQ of overseas Chinese in the US and especially South Africa, Carribeans and Brazil showed similar to 105. Mind you their grand parents were again mostly disadvantaged rural landless Chinese in China who migrated overseas for being mainly hard labourers.

I agree with curent rural Chinese IQ is prehaps lower than that of the coatals, but that by much, a couple points?

Western Tibetan and Chinese Muslim regions and most southern region bordering Vietnam perhaps have lower IQ – more than a couple of points.

One thing not well known also statistically supports the view that there’s not much difference between interior rural and rich coastal China in innate IQ: China’s rigurous annual national university entrance exams, so called GaoKao, have shown that historically rural Chinese provinces outperform coastal Chinese provinces in key Maths and Science scores EVERY year. Richer metropolitans such as Beijing and Shanghai are not in the top 10 or 15 ranking list, not even once for the last 15 years.

14 million people are out of work in the USA. Another 6 million are working in temporary jobs unrelated to their primary skills
and experience.

These people are out of work because their IQs are too low in the range 75-80. That’s why. They should not have been hired in the
first place. They should be glad they had jobs doing nothing and those jobs lasted as long as they did.

Have you really walked around Harvard or Ivy Leagues? Till this year the maximum number of Students in US universities came from India. And ya…Indians are the largest group of Physicians in this country.

One more thing: Average household income of Indian family in the US is by far the highest. More than Japanese, Chinese, Koreans, or Whites.

They are all East Asian (Chinese people, Korean, Japanese, etc…)

It’s their culture that heavily emphasize education from birth.

[Jared Diamond, UCLA sociologist and Author, 1997]

“There was once a civilization that was the greatest in the world. It was able to create a continental super-state that stretched from ocean to ocean, and from northern climes to tropics and deserts…the civilization I’m talking about was the Islamic world from the year 800 to 1600… Although we are often unaware of our indebtedness to this other civilization, its gifts are very much a part of our heritage”

[Carly Fiorina, ex-CEO of Hewlett-Packard, 2001]

“For the first three centuries of its existence (circ. A.D 650-1000) the realm of Islam was the most civilized and progressive portion of the world. Studded with splendid cities, gracious mosques and quiet universities where the wisdom of the ancient world was preserved and appreciated, the Moslem world offered a striking contrast to the Christian West, then sunk in the night of the Dark Ages.”

[Lothrop Stoddard, Ph.D (Harvard), American political theorist and historian, 1932]

That is why immigrant groups tend to increase their IQ after a generation or two. The Jews and Irish had low IQ’s in 1910, so the eugenics folks wanted to pass laws limiting their offspring. Very amusing to read these arguments a hundred years later.

As for the Chinese:don’t believe anything that comes out of there, because they want only the best picture of their country…