Comments on: Assange of Wikileaks’ Blackmail Scam http://www.bloggernews.net/125069 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Sun, 27 May 2012 15:54:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: julietoo http://www.bloggernews.net/125069#comment-1730465 julietoo Mon, 16 Aug 2010 04:27:58 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/125069#comment-1730465 I don't know where xdiesp has been living lately, but this article is spot - on insofar as Assange and the anti-americanism he buys into. Assange claims that heavy - hitting intellectuals a la Noam Chomsky are on the board of Wikileaks (this was over a year ago), yet when questioned, Chomsky denied knowing of wikileaks, or of Assange. But that's how Assange works - everything is "secret," so of course Chomsky lied about his involvement, because for Assange, Wikileaks is some kind of above everything entity, and secret; therefore, all is "implied" without being admitted to. And using money as a reason for NOT being able to process out names of individuals contained in his "top secret" information prior to publication really does lay bare the reality of what Assange is thinking about: Himself. I don’t know where xdiesp has been living lately, but this article is spot - on insofar as Assange and the anti-americanism he buys into.

Assange claims that heavy - hitting intellectuals a la Noam Chomsky are on the board of Wikileaks (this was over a year ago), yet when questioned, Chomsky denied knowing of wikileaks, or of Assange.

But that’s how Assange works - everything is “secret,” so of course Chomsky lied about his involvement, because for Assange, Wikileaks is some kind of above everything entity, and secret; therefore, all is “implied” without being admitted to.

And using money as a reason for NOT being able to process out names of individuals contained in his “top secret” information prior to publication really does lay bare the reality of what Assange is thinking about: Himself.

]]> By: xdiesp http://www.bloggernews.net/125069#comment-1729793 xdiesp Sat, 14 Aug 2010 22:24:37 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/125069#comment-1729793 This news is completely false. In an interview, Assange had stated that the organization would have to spend about 750'000$ to check all the names in the 15'000 unpublished memos. Unless helped by someone else. You have spin this around in the most vile and unprofessional way! This news is completely false. In an interview, Assange had stated that the organization would have to spend about 750′000$ to check all the names in the 15′000 unpublished memos. Unless helped by someone else. You have spin this around in the most vile and unprofessional way!

]]>