We are presently watching activists manipulate the media on Israel. It is not a real story, but one that has it’s aim to demonize Israel, who is the newest whipping boy of the activist left in Europe (replacing Bush and Global warming, I guess).
StrategyPage has the facts,
“…The donors of tons of supplies in the three cargo ships, could have landed the supplies at an Israeli port, and have them shipped legally into Gaza (where supplies arrive daily that way.) But the pro-Hamas activists want Israeli control over what goes in, or out, of Gaza, to be removed, so that terrorists can move weapons in and attackers out, at will…”
Both Israel and Egypt have been trying to prevent arms from being smuggled into Gaza, but “activists” moan about the poor people whose lives are wrecked by big bad Israel, not about Iran’s power move into Lebanon and Gaza. Which makes one wonder about Turkey’s involvement in the matter. Turkey, a member of NATO, is now best friends with Iran, yet historically they are enemies (Ottoman empire, anyone)?
And Israel, as expected, overreacted with troops attacking the ships. Yet one wonders: what it the alternative? If these ships got through, it would mean the end of a blockade, and a green-light to smuggle in more missiles and weapons.
So why isn’t anyone bothering to ask why “peace activists” are so eager to join groups that actively promote terror (at least against Jews and other infidels) when this escapade could easily start a war?
Never mind. It’s not about peace: it’s all about them.
As Brendan O’Neill at Spiked writes sardonically:
The flotilla incident confirms that for many bereft and confused politicians and activists over here, supporting Palestinians has become a shortcut to discovering a sense of urgent purpose and moral meaning. Palestinians are turned into the playthings of moral charlatans…In Europe in particular, shallow pro-Palestinian pity / anti-Israel sentiment is widespread, for various but always self-serving reasons. It unites the far left and the far right, with the left hoping to conjure up some profound feeling of anti-imperialist rage and the right trotting out the usual old rubbish about ‘evil Jews’.
And, of course, it allows them to ignore the really nasty wars, where intervension by the UN has done so little to stem, such as the one in the central African states, that has killed a couple million human beings over the last few years and continues to do so. But of course, if they bothered to do this, they might have to face the legacy of their colonial past, the failure of their countries to intervene to save lives, and the farce of UN peacekeepers who are too few and too poorly trained to do much to stem the violence.
————————————-
Nancy Reyes is a retired physician living in the rural Philippines. She blogs about human rights at Makaipablog.















7 users commented in " Israel: The Theatre of the Absurd for Peace Loving Bigots "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackThis whole episode really illustrates the fog of war. It is so easy to take a few facts as both sides have done and spin an argument that sounds compelling. Eg. one argument against the flotilla is why they refuse to go to the Israelli port to dispense their humanitarian relief. I believe there are 2 reasons. One, the Israellis steadfastly refuse to publish a list of allowed goods and appear to change their minds daily on what is allowed. Eg. Hair conditioner is banned at the moment. Secondly, the UN say that there is a humanitarian crisis in Gaza and that the 15000 tonnes of aid flowing through the checkpoints is about a quarter of what is needed. Therefore channeling more aid from the Flotilla through these check points wont increase the flow of aid as it is throttled by the Israelli authorities. The second reason is the more obvious in that the activists are committing a political act in order to bring the Gaza issue to the forefront in world politics. I do see a form of collective punishment of the Gaza people taking place including children. I believe that Hamas needs to be marginalized and the least effective way of doing so is committing 1.5M Gazans to an effective prison.
ah yes. A Hairtonic crisis in Gaza means it’s okay to pull this farce.
And of course they can also import via Egypt, but never mind.
As for a “humanitarian crisis”, well, I didn’t see them trying to get food to my friends in Zimbabwe when Mugabe was stopping convoys from South African churches from importing food.
[...] » Israel: The Theatre of the Absurd for Peace Loving Bigots … [...]
The Hair tonic crisis you refer to shows the absurdity of what Israel are blocking and illustrates a collective punishment of the general population unless you think the Govt strategists think that depriving Hamas of hair products will set their terrorist campaign back.
As for humanitarian crisis, The UN on the ground have stated it and Israel deny it. Who should I believe?
The activists (the Irish one’s anyway) have been involved in other parts of the world and Ireland in general has been very supportive of Israel. Just because they have not solved the world’s other problems does not detract from their credibility. Finally, if you are comparing Zimbabwe with Israel then you do Israel a massive disservice. We expect high things from Israel as it is a first world democracy. We dont expect much from Zimbabwe, a tin pot dictatorship run by a lunatic who really does not care about decency or human rights.
Zimbabwe is a democracy, in case you don’t follow the news.
True, Mugabe’s thugs distorted the constitution in the early 2000′s when his popularity waned, but in the last three years South Africa is trying to reinstitute the institutions of Democracy, and Tsvangirai is now Prime Minister.
And things are much better there now than they were in 2008, when Mugabe was banning all NGO’s and insisting that his thugs take over the relief work funding.
as for the UN: They are valuable, but NGO’s are not always believable.
Note on Hair tonic: In Leisure Suit Larry, a molatov cocktail was made from hair tonic and a paper bag.
No real disgreement on Zimbabwe except that Mugabe did lose the election and still managed to hold onto sone strings despite the rigging.
The IDF better watch out for terrorist coiffeurs.
Agree with your point on UN NGOs but when its a choice between UN NGO and the IDF, who to believe is an easy choice for me.
Nice corresponding with you
Leave A Reply