<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Book Review: Unlimited Visability  by Jonathan Walden</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/123724</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 11:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/123724#comment-1498707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 22:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/123724#comment-1498707</guid>
		<description>I also should have mentioned in my previous comment that I don't remember reading anything in this book about being "nice," but I do remember him talking at length about the concept of equilibrium (learned while observing life on tropical coral reefs), freedom of conscience, and federalism. His arguments are considerably buttressed by historical and scientific discussions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also should have mentioned in my previous comment that I don&#8217;t remember reading anything in this book about being &#8220;nice,&#8221; but I do remember him talking at length about the concept of equilibrium (learned while observing life on tropical coral reefs), freedom of conscience, and federalism. His arguments are considerably buttressed by historical and scientific discussions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/123724#comment-1498691</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 21:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/123724#comment-1498691</guid>
		<description>I have read this book. There is much here questioning the "givens" under which our societies function. It questions the function of the rule of law and law itself, the real purpose of "rights" the way in which we define money, and how our present concept of money constricts us. It asks "Why does a government that issues fiat money need to be funded?" I thought the discussion of this question was particularly fascinating. This is equal-opportunity iconoclasm celebrating true liberty and true justice. Prepare to be challenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read this book. There is much here questioning the &#8220;givens&#8221; under which our societies function. It questions the function of the rule of law and law itself, the real purpose of &#8220;rights&#8221; the way in which we define money, and how our present concept of money constricts us. It asks &#8220;Why does a government that issues fiat money need to be funded?&#8221; I thought the discussion of this question was particularly fascinating. This is equal-opportunity iconoclasm celebrating true liberty and true justice. Prepare to be challenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

