We will be running our regular look back on the two frustrating Florida cases of Haleigh Cummings and Caylee Anthony on Sunday Jan 3 at 3pm central (4pm eastern).
The panel will be comprised of Simon and Jan Barrett, the news and programming director for WSKY 97.3 TJ Hart, and crime writer Denny Griffin.
PCSO have announced that they are working on some new leads that are causing them to reexamine the days leading up to the abduction, and the day that Haleigh Cummings disappeared. They are not elaborating on what these new leads might be, but they do seem to be up beat that once more the search is moving forward.
Both Ronald Cummings and Misty Croslin had close encounters with the police this week, we are working on the details right now.
Crystal Shefield and her mother Marie Griffis are now involved with the Jacksonville based help group Hurting Families With Children in Crime. We do not know much about this group, they do not seem to have a lot of information online. Also it is not clear in what capacity they are assisting the family.
You can catch the entire program by pointing your browser at www.blogtalkradio.com a few minutes before 3pm on Sunday.
Simon and Jan Barrett


















49 users commented in " Haleigh Cummings & Caylee Anthony Update – Sunday 3pm Central "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackHi, Simon & Jan!
Looking forward to your Radio Program this Sunday at 3 p.m.!
I just read an article that Crystal sit down and speak with one of the local papers asking for answers to where Haleigh is. She has doubt on the LE as well. I have never heard of that group before but atleast its something and they are looking for help.
My prayers are still with Haleigh I hope that they can solve and bring this little girl home.
As for Ron and Misty it doesnt shock me any that they were in the news thats seem all they care about is stay in the news to get off on it. They should be finding this precious little girl instead finding themselves in hte news.
waiting for the new evidence and hoping it will result with the guilty parties going to jailin the cummings case.In the Anthony case I believe justice will be served.
Just wondering if the “new information” statement is PCSO’s way of trying to convince people that they are doing something.
Given that just a couple of weeks ago they denied the release of information to a request on the grounds that they were actively investigating the case. I find the timing of the “new information” statement odd.
is this a new car chase or an old car chase?
I’m confused
Looking forward to Sunday’s show. Belated Happy New Year to you!
OJ’s Glove: LOL! It does sound familiar doesn’t it? It will end similarly as well, I think. Much ado about nothing or some set-up.
I can’t wait. We’ve been debating back and forth so much on the 911 & New Info threads that I think a couple of us need to persue a law degree cause man, can we all argue a case!
We’ve been “hashing out” the details and each side had been represented. No matter where you stand on this incident, there is very good info there. I’m even thinking of actually calling in this week! I’m not working on Sunday, finally!
I’m not holding my breath on this “New Information”. It just seems a little too odd and They know everyone is furious now. So they have to say this BS to calm everyone down. But it won’t work.
Paws69, my feelings exactly. Much ado about nothing. We’ve had a pacifier shoved in our mouths. Won’t work. Mine dinged the wall after reading the first sentence of their news release.
very true.it’s probably just a re run.I was hoping all this stuff with misty,rc,cj and his dad ,that perhaps misty did in fact give out some info while she was messed up on whatever,and just maybe in the heat of all the problems someone decided to repeat what they might have been told to le.Is this why rc is trying to get her back???????
To me its not too out on a limb that PCSO has new info, alot of people have been in and out of jail recently and I am sure they were all questioned. That maybe where all this new info came from. Tommy, Hank, and several of the families relatives have passed through LE.jmo
Tobias, I do agree that it could be another party who gave new info. I wonder who it could be, weird the timing if it was Pa or Bubba. It’s been a couple of weeks since thier “visit” to the lock-up. Could it be that they (PCSO) has only finished following their info up and it finally leads somewhere? Or could it have been someone else? I’m wondering if CJ has blown Misty’s alibi of being at home, alone, and asleep. Just pure speculation….Maybe he saw her out that night? or knows where she was. What new info??? It might not even pertain to Misty. I guess we’ll just have to wait to see.
These “assumptions” are based on the predicate that PCSO is insisting that Misty is still the “Key”. Not my personal feelings, just some questions that came to mind after reading the above comments.
Just another hour and a 1/2…..
The jail has been a revolving door since Haleigh went missing. So I honestly don’t think there is new info from any of these people. Unless of course someone is talking smack again just to get out of jail for free again.
PAW69, I would put my bet on it’s just “smack” talk - what else have they ever done??
Does anyone else get the impression that Ron had a low opinion from the very start of PCSO in the first 911 when Haleigh is missing he says they arent coming and he has better people to call. Then in this incident he says geez f people they come when you are someone.
But he says he trusts John Merchant, who is Merchant and why is he trustworthy to Ron? jmo
I also find it odd that Crystal is just now coming up and saying it’s been too long. Why didn’t she say something months ago? I feel TN has been the one not only talking for herself, but also for Ron. Marie and Chrystal haven’t said anything until now. Why wait so long to open their mouths?
I dont think Crystal cared enough to take Haleigh, she liked just having her on the visitations. I dont think she was concerned at all until she came up missing.jmo
Teresa has been the only one who has acted responcible in this bunch. She doesnt get into trouble, does interviews, pleads always for Haleighs safe return, and has not givin up.
I wished her son would act his age and try to stay out of trouble and find his child. He may be torn up over this but he needs to remember Haleigh should come first in his life. jmo
I think that is why so many people have a problem with him/them. They want to go on with their lives as they were/are, no improvements, no changes, no regrets Right?
PAW69 I think you solved this case long ago. I really do. You were right but everyone wants to go in every other direction.
I just wanted to say that Hope needs to be in rehab,she’s just a kid and is in and out of jail.If either Katrina or TN doesn’t do something,it might be too late for this child.This makes four times since June.If they can’t help Hope,how in the world are they going to keep Jr from going the same route?Sarah’s in jail,Hope’s in and out,come on,these people need to worry about thier children and keep them off drugs,it’s ridiculous!
WinterRose, who is Hope? who is Sarah? TIA
Hope Sykes is Grandma Syke’s granddaughter and Sara is Crystal’s sister. She should be getting out of jail this month sometime
Thank you Vaquera!!
Wow,I just listened to Levi’s show with Misty talking,what in the world?What was Charles going to do if Misty and RC pulled over,was some of his buddies,like Quinton and Marcus going to show up?We saw the myspace pics of CJ’s at Christmas with him and his relatives and all those guns.If something happens to Misty or RC,won’t be hard to figure that out.She has 15 calls of threats from CJ and his Dad,what is wrong with these people?We listened to some,these are dangerous people and after listening to some of those threats,I hope LE is looking to see if revenge was what happened to HaLeigh.Is she being hidden to try to get RC or Misty in jail?Listening to CJ’s 911 call again,is it me or if a big pick up rams you going that fast,are you still going to be talking in monotone,or be freaked out and your voice kind of changes with the impact?And he’s asking dispatch if he can shoot RC?And his grand prix just supposedly slammed into RC’s pick up,which LE said no damage to his car,and his voice still doesn’t change,still monotone.
Dispatch asked if Charles has any guns?LOL Screenshot his myspace pics.pfffttt!
I like Levi,he called it.
BS
cent said,
in January 3rd, 2010 at 11:53 pm
My thoughts/questions… on the harassing calls
Where is Misty’s home/living with whom?
Ronnie charged with what?
Why is Misty always the one that has to file charges… cause it’s her phone!?! The main threats were against Ron.
I think that there was something more going on with Misty/CJ. He sounds like a jilted lover.
cent said,
in January 4th, 2010 at 12:09 am
Why in the world would Misty go and live with someone who has close ties to the other side’s family, besides her reason of having no where to live?… especially with the shank threat.
And why would they take her in?? I don’t think it was because they felt sorry for her.
Winter,
Yeah, I’ve got to say that Misty does sound way more credible… now, after the show. I just wish more questions were asked regarding CS’s brother. And how MC actually met CJ and family.
I was watching the chat,Wayanne K said she met Charles and he kept going back and forth RC’s tent,she should tell LE that.So,he was watching RC right after HaLeigh went missing and they were at the tents?
LOL,right after Levi’s show started,Charles has LE there,claiming he has threatening phonecalls?Soap opera,pffttt!
Bad boys,bad boys,whatcha gonna do…..
Winter,
What is this about… what chat and are you saying that he has calls from Misty/Ron threatening him?
===============
WinterRose said,
in January 4th, 2010 at 2:51 am
LOL,right after Levi’s show started,Charles has LE there,claiming he has threatening phonecalls?Soap opera,pffttt!
There were a couple of things that bothered me about Misti’s interview with Levi.
One is that she admitted that she stayed with CJ and his family, but yet Ron had to tell her where he lived on the 911 call that she made?
Two, I would like to hear BOTH calls in their entirety. I don’t think that we heard all of both calls.
Three, and this has been brought up elsewhere as well, the only way that LE could know for certain if there was a gun in Ron’s truck the night that this “road incident” happened would have been to have pulled him over and searched the truck.
To me, it sounded as if the phone calls that Misti played for Levi’s show were done after the road incident because of CJ’s father stating that he wanted to talk to Ron about pulling a gun on his son.
There is also the issue that Misti doesn’t know what the problem is between CJ and Ron, after all she has only known CJ and his family for a few months.
And the Law says….
I didn’t catch misty on levi’s show yesterday, but I did listen to both tapes pretty good. I had read a comment that claimed cj seemed so upset.. No, he wasn’t.. In fact to tell you the truth, I could have sworn he was setting in a parked vehicle, If he had his window down to hear the passing of the other vehicle, it didn’t help the traveling mode at all. My Grandson heard several sounds on the misty tape, I was listening to as he walked up behind me.. And he ask, Nana what are those Bumps on the tape I hear? I listened again, and he was right there are three identical sounds, the vehicle is being bumped, tapped what ever anyone wants to refer to it as… listen to the tape.. My opinion here.. Misty called Ron out to a dark area, Misty wasn’t suppose to get into that vehicle, the getting her stuff from the house was an excuse she used once he got there, or he would have brought the stuff to her.. and on the way back to the house, cj is waiting in the middle of the road. Now, anyone can call this road rage.. I have a different word to use.. Try setup!!! Question.. If misty had not gotten into the vehicle, which apprently ticked two of the jones off that she was.. Would there have been a shoot incident out on Buffalo Bluff Road?? What about the children in the vehicle.. We only have cj statement that ron had a weapon, and the question was it authorized for him to shoot ron if necessary.. seems like a slip from the tongue.. What about the children in the Vehicle.. Last question.. after cj brought that issue up.. Was the plan to shoot Ron without a witness present? Lets cover the cop parked on the side of the road that did not chase these flying vehicles down the road.. true or not true?? The only reason the cop would be parked on the side of the road, or at least professional reason, would be to catch speeders and road rage in progress.. Right, well if this one saw this in progress and did not move, so much for his professionalism.. Could his veh be broken down.. Naw, Officer would have waited with the vehicle until the wrecker arrived, and then be transported by a second unit.. Which would have put two cops in the area.. So, maybe cj lied about the cop being there? How much more would he have lied about, seems that Ron and Misty didn’t see the cop.. I do hope that Putnam County, takes a long long look at this, and if it turns out that ron is guilty.. okay, then he deserves to go visit the grey hotel, but if he isn’t, then lots of questions need to be ask, and that word I used in the beginning.. Called setup.. The question that really needs to be ask, why was cj waiting for ron that night? why would he really want to legally shoot ron.. Ron had no weapon.. which means, if ron and cj were alone on that stretch of road, dark beyond imagination, no witness..
What would have happened??? Why do they want it to happen???
“So, maybe cj lied about the cop being there?”
Misty also mentions the cop on the side of the road in her call.
“Ron had no weapon”
We do not know that for sure…
mlee, you can go to blog talk radio and pull up Levi’s interview with Misty and hear the show now if you want to. Just FYI
Regarding cops and guns:
Sometime between 26 seconds and 45 seconds when dispatcher is asking what color the other car is, Misty says, “There’s a cop car right there.”
- -
Near the beginning of CJ’s call:
CJ: :22 operator “Where are you at?”
CJ replies “I just passed Shell Harbour…there’s a cop sitting there…I just blew past him doing 80-90 miles an hour.
–
(m2c note: Later dispatcher asks about deputy that CJ saw)
CJ: 4:24 CJ “It was just a car sittin on the side of the road. I went by him doin 90 in a 45..”
About guns:
1:56 CJ “Now he’s in front of me just goin kind of slow but he kept slammin on the brakes and I know he’s got a gun…I know that…but the cop said it’s concealed so I know that it’s legal.”
(m2c note: What cop told CJ - and when did he tell him - that “it’s concealed so that it’s legal?” Very strange)
CJ - 2:20 “If he tries to shoot me and I shoot him will I go to prison for shooting him?
(That gives me the impression that CJ has a gun with him.)
Yes, I think CJ had a gun and was wanting the operator give him permission to shoot Ron with it.
what’s up with this?
http://murtwitnessonelive.com/wordpress/2010/01/03/blogtalkradio-the-new-toy-for-the-lulz-crowd/
Considering the source here, but still uncalled for.
m2c note: What cop told CJ - and when did he tell him - that “it’s concealed so that it’s legal?” Very strange)
CJ - 2:20 “If he tries to shoot me and I shoot him will I go to prison for shooting him?
(That gives me the impression that CJ has a gun with him.)
I’m in total Total agreement!
Yes he was asking if the “Force For Force” rule would be in effect. “If I am threatened by someone with a gun and I happen to have a gun in my possesion, can I shoot without recourse?”
http://crime.about.com/od/gunlawsbystate/p/gunlaws_fl.htm
“Under Florida law, there is no “duty to retreat” if you are attacked in any place you have a lawful right to be. Instead, you may stand your ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if you reasonably believe it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily harm to yourself or others.”
She could not advise or give permission.
I have no doubt that Cj either had a gun or was going to go and get one. They were near his home and neighborhood by then. Why did Ron follow onto 309B? Do we know yet? It was after they had given the tag number, right? I need to listen again to see.
“It is unlawful to have or carry a firearm in the presence of one or more persons and exhibit the firearm in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manners, except in cases of self-defense.”
Here are some of Kim Picasso’s exact statements about her Client Crystal Sheffield, the mother of missing child Haleigh Cummings. The entire transcript can be found on the Art Harris website. A link is posted at the bottom of these quotes of the exact words of Crystal Sheffield’s lawyer Kim Picazio.
Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield, Marie Griffis and where their focus was in the time Haleigh Cummings had just gone missing.
In fact, days before the child went missing, Crystal had been served with a Motion for Contempt and a notice to appear in court for failure to pay child support to the custodial parent. Crystal had paid less than one thousand dollars ($1.000) of her child support
obligation since 2005. Of course, in the initial months of Haleigh’s disappearance, the last thing that I thought was appropriate would be to seek a modification of child support based on the fact that one child had been abducted. At all times, Marie Griffis felt we should file a court action lowering the amount Crystal was to pay to Ronald Cummings for support. Such an action was, in my opinion, highly inappropriate while investigators were still actively seeking to find little Haleigh and 0bring her home safely.
They (Crystal and her family) firmly believed that the family’s telephones and homes were being wire tapped, and that they were under surveillance by authorities, the media, and the Cummings family. The picture that was initially presented to me upon my entry into the case was much different than what I later learned to be factually true Marie Griffis. Marie was at all times outspoken, demanding, and extremely controlling of Crystal. She insisted that certain aspects of the case be divulged to the media. Mostly, this information related to negative rumors about Ronald Cummings. I learned that Marie Griffis had already begun a rather formal and publicized campaign for donations for her family. When I first arrived in Satsuma, I noted a handwritten poster at the family’s Haleigh Tent advertising a raffle for a Ford Expedition to take place on March 16, 2009. Further, the family and their friends had organized charity events in Haleigh’s honor at local businesses, set out donation jugs in town and at the tent, ordered tee shirts, pins and other trinkets with Haleigh’s picture and information displayed, and were selling these items for a profit to locals and tourists. All proceeds were, at that juncture, unaccounted for to my knowledge, and were being spent as they came in by the Crystal and Marie Griffis.By early May, 2009, I was informed by Marie that all funds from donations had been spent by the family Marie Griffis expressed her desire to form a nonprofit organization to seek donations from the public. I became aware that Marie had already been in negotiations with a concert promoter to hold a concert event to honor Haleigh, and to gain contributions and funds. . Ihighly disagreed with such organized efforts to raise money in the name of the search for Haleigh Cummings. Crystal and Marie never funded one searvh for Haleigh Cummings and paid NONE of the costs of the Haleighbug Center. Kim Picazio paid for the Haleighbug Center. Crystal and Marie kept all the money for the “searches” Crystal’s seeking of donations was insidious, and was an attempt to make a living off her own missing child
Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield and the custody issues with Ron Cummings over Junior and Haleigh Cummings.
Upon reviewing the court file, I found that my client had not been completely honest with me regarding her involvement in the Paternity proceedings of 2005. Affidavit of Service of
the original Petition for to Establish Paternity, personally served on Crystal Sheffield. Crystal then missed the Final Hearing.I realized that I had not been given thorough or accurate information regarding the procedural history of the paternity action. The procedures followed by the Court were standard. Crystal had had her day in Court, and had lost – fair and square. Crystal and her family, in an effort to raise her public image, had told numerous media outlets that the only reason that she did not have custody of her children was that she was not served with court papers, and had lost custody by default. Also, she claimed on national television that Ronald had kidnapped the children, and that his family, through their collusion and “connections” in the courthouse, made sure that Ronald retained custody of the children. This claim was simply untrue, and I was wholly unwilling to corroborate their previous version of the court file. I spent numerous meetings with Crystal and her mother, explaining that I could not attest facts that were untrue to the media, or to anyone else. At that time,I believe that a wedge began to form between Marie Griffis and I.
Kim Picasso on Crystal Sheffield and her drug abuse issues.
Crystal’s former private investigator William Staubs entered into a contract for investigative work with Crystal’s Father, Johnny Sheffield. Surprisingly, Crystal’s own father began doing interviews with avant guard media forums claiming that Crystal had a present drug problem, and was in need of rehabilitation. ,
Crystal Sheffield suffered a seizure while driving her vehicle with her infant daughter
in the car. Upon learning of the car accident, I was then informed by Crystal’s fiancé
for the first time that Crystal had been previously instructed not to drive her vehicle by her
primary care physician, as she had suffered seizures in the past. Unbeknownst to me, Crystal’s father had come upon the scene of her car accident to assist his daughter. Crystal’s Father has allegedly executed a sworn affidavit stating that when he came upon the scene of the accident, Crystal admitted to being on prescription pain medication (unprescribed), and gave her father the pills to hide from the police who were on their way to the accident site
The Department of Children and Families became aware of the allegations of drug use by Crystal. DCF requested a random toxicology test of Crystal Sheffield, during the course of their investigation, as they found it relevant to investigate Crystal’s fitness as a parent.
At that time, in June 2009, I learned from DCF that Crystal’s infant daughter, Chloe,
not even one (1) year of age, had been born with illegal narcotics in her system due to
Crystal’s drug use during her pregnancy. .
I felt as if I was only being told relevant information by the family, after a fiasco
had occurred. I could not represent a client who was not being honest with me, and was
taking illegal drugs. To make matters worse, In April 2009, Crystal admitted to me that
she had taken unprescribed pain medication. Further, her mother, Marie Griffis, reported
to me that Crystal had stolen her step-father’s pain medication after he had surgery in April.
There was evidence of her recent drug use and driving while under the influence of unprescribed pain medication. Further, her own Father had strongly represented to the media that he would testify that she was not fit to care for her children, due to her consistent drug use.
Despite Marie Griffis demanding I file a modification proceeding to seek custody of Crystal’s son in Ronald Cummings’ care, I was not willing to lie to the Court, and I did not feel that such an action would be successful. Marie Griffis became increasingly angered at my hesitancy to file a court action
for a change of custody. In good faith,was simply not willing to file such a pleading,
knowing my client was using drugs.,I informed Crystal and Marie on several occasions
of my recommendations and my opinions, but it was met with anger and frustration. There were many times that I requested private meetings with my client alone, as otherwise, her mother would insert her own feelings and demands on me and the case strategy, leaving Crystal’s feelings and desires unheard and discarded.
Kim Picazio On Crystal Sheffield and her involvement with her children Junior and Haleigh Cummings.
Crystal had never complained about her complete lack of involvement in her children’s lives since 2005. She did not attend doctors or dentist appointments, or even know who their medical care providers were. She did not ever visit the children during the week, even though her Final Judgment provided that the alternating weekends were a minimum visitation schedule, and permitted her to see the children duringthe week upon notice. Crystal did not speak with her children over the telephone during the week, and her only contact with them was roughly four (4) days per month on alternating weekends. Crystal had not been involved in Haleigh’s school, school functions, and did not even know what school Ronald, Jr. would be attending in the Fall of 2009.
Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield and the police investigation.
Although I gave specific recommendations and guidance to Crystal to call the Sheriff’s
Office once per week to check on the status of Haleigh’s case, she failed to do so.
I do not believe she called the Sheriff’s Office for a status report on a single occasion
during my representation.
It was my understanding that Crystal was not a prime suspect in the case.
I attempted to persuade the family that we needed to heed the directives of law enforcement. Unfortunately, my recommendations were met with great resistance and anger by Marie Griffis
This was due to the fact that their animosity toward Ronald Cummings had previously resulted in family members and friends erupting to reporters, cursing, and present as vindictive. Such public animosity and unbridled blame did not serve Crystal’s interests, or make good impressions on the law enforcement team that were investigating Haleigh’s disappearance.
Ist (MG) is supposed to be making serious accusations against her daughter and then almost in the same breath defending her.That’s crazy and sounds to me it came from the Ron Cummings side of the family.RON CUMMINGS was the one collecting all the donations from the local bussiness establishments until he got cut off.Where is Ron now? Where is his Mom that has always been there to defend both Ron and Misty? She continued to defend Misty even after she knew Misty was having multiple sex partners while with Ron.Of course we don’t hear from Ron either,and never really did.He has had very little to say,except when he became super angry when Misty left his butt.Of course then he made accusations against her.Keep your friends close and your enemies closer means to me(Keep MISTY happy and quiet)He doesn’t suspect Misty,he knows for a fact Misty could spill the goods on everyone connected,including him.I believe he knew what was planned to happen that evening his daughter went missing,that’s why he was continiously calling her cell phone,he wanted to know if the plan went as scheduled,otherwise any father would have left work to make sure his children were safe,simply because he knew of Misty’s drug problem and never should have left those children in her care,especially after the wild weekend party she participated in,she was probably the main attraction!!!!!come on LE wake up and smell the coffee,or Im sure you can’t be that stoopid and you’ve at least thought about this therey.The lie detector test doesn’t mean anything that he claims he passed.A lot of criminals,murders,rapists,child molesters,child porno and the list keep growing that pass these things everday.Ask him to take the Hypnotisism test,see if he could pass that, or give him some twilight sleep,he would have no control over that.If asked I’m most sure both he and misty would decline!!!!!I know twilight sleep is not for legal issues,but no one can lie or fight that.They have no control and answer truthfully,this would clear up a lot of questions.Someone from the investigators to the FBI to LE check on this,I believe it could be arranged and there is no reason for either to decline,it could clear them if they weren’t involved,and possibly a couple of other family members could shed some light.These are only theories that I truly believe and I hope law enforcement has at least thought about these same probabilities.Sometimes you have to go outside the scope to get at the truth.I think it’s time law enforcement do just that!!!!!!!
listening, it seems to me that LE has not taken one step outside the “scope” of “Misty did it” or “Misty is the key.” So if they’re right they haven’t gotten anywhere and if they’re wrong it looks like they haven’t even begun to investigate any other possibility.
Well they better have investigated Marie Griffis and that family. What I have read about them makes them so suspect. But then again maybe they really are just sociopaths that do not care about Haleigh. Either that or they know where she is so that is not the primary agenda for them. But if you make a list of reasons they seem guilty it is SUCH a long list.
So what would be the motive for Chrystal to abduct or murder? To get even with Ron? was there a life insurance policy for Haleigh cumin’s? I have not read anything about life insurance.
P.S happy father’s day to allPapa bloggers.
Leave A Reply