The fears about the “wire-tapping” were voiced by BOTH sides, so one cancels out the other, so to speak.
I do agree that what Crystal/Marie & Kim did was dirty and underhanded. Was it for a purpose? Yes, Did it work? NO. So now what? If they have Haleigh, what do they do now? Surely the cops would ask her many many wuestions should she return and whomever had her would be “exsposed”. SO how would she ever be able to be returned?
I agree that Ronald has not attacked the Sheffield’s the way Ron, Misty, & family have been by the S family & attorney.
It does seem odd that their focus would be on those areas rather then on actually locating Haleigh, no matter who it hurts….

I am speaking out at this time because from day one I have heard this Marie person and her daughter go on every show, every website, every blog and point their fingers at Ron Cummings and Misty Croslin as drug users. Then we learn that low and behold Crytal Sheffield is a drug addict that put her children at risk.
I noticed that Ron Cummings tried very hard not to say anything bad about Crystal Sheffield this entire time. After being attacked numerous times by them he finally made a few tiny remarks but NOTHING compared to what they have said. Seems to me they were more concerned with making him look as bad as they could than with finding this child.
Then I read what Kim Picazio has to say and it turns out that the main focus of Marie Griffis and Crystal Sheffield was Making money off a missing child, making Ron Cummings look bad not hard to do) and making themselves look good and innocent. This is very odd to me what a child’s life is at stake. Very odd.

Seriously…. Has that not crossed anyone’s mind? They are young adults.

LOL….LMAOROTF

David:
Crystal or her involvement is still being questioned.

Things that bother me about this..
misty calls ron and wants to talk..
Did she know he was home with the children and they had to come with her, and children consist of Junior and Ron’s niece..

Ron gets out to Buffalo Bluff Road and after reading the police report, lets type in Tyler Rd. Getting the point, her home address is 116 Tyler Rd… Anyway, Misty tells him that she needs to get the rest of her things from his house.. Why didn’t she do that over the phone and he would have brought them to her.. Right??

But no, she decides to go with him to get her things.. With no one at home to watch the two little ones, they had to come out with Ron..

Important question: When did misty realize there were two children in that vehicle??

Next, they start back on buffalo bluff road and locals, can tell you.. that is a dark and isolated roadway, so is 309.. Well traveling back, they find Charles Jones setting in the middle of the Road, not in his vehicle.. in his girl friends vehicle.. And her name is not misty. What would we do if we found a vehicle setting in the middle of the road, try going around it? What if.. that vehicle was waiting for Ron to return back down Buffalo Bluff Rd.

Question: If Charles JOnes knew Ron was going out there, and would be returning, who told him this.. He lives way over in Georgetown, so this is a bit of an unusual location for him to suddenly, just be setting in the middle of the road.. And just because ron drove around him this incidence occurred?? Or.. Was he waiting for Ron?? What were the intents?? If Ron did not have a weapon, why did cj continue to claim he did, and threatened him with it, and was it okay if he could shoot Ron?? Now there is also the issue that jones didn’t know misty was in the vehicle until later, well what later?? they both were on the phone with PCSO, but misty did not reveal her name to the dispatcher, the dispatcher did not reveal this info to CJ, so if the officers talked to cj first, and then the 5 unit flew over to rons house and they found out then, that it was misty, how could they have told cj misty was in the vehicle? and while the pcso officers were at Ron’s house misty had already gotten the phone messages, and there were some coming in while the deputies were standing there, he listened to them.. all the threats, the warnings, the cussing, and all pcso was interested in was going by to tell the jones boys, hey stop calling misty!!! So, just when did jones realize misty was in the vehicle?? Cout it have been when he was behind them, and he saw a female using her cell phone?? maybe a little mouse in his pocket whispered, hey that misty and she’s calling 911.. you better cover your back side and go to step two, and make it look like Rons the one doing this.. question: How did charles jones know ron was going to be coming back up buffalo bluff road???? And what did he intend to do, if he hadn’t realized misty (a witness) was in that truck? Was misty in trouble with Charles JOnes for being in that truck?? Is that the reason she received all of those messages?? Something in this smells awfully bad!!!!

Thank you. No, that is fine with me that you shared. I have to catch up on everything, have not been on since Sunday! Looks like I have a lot of reading to do!

Here are some of Kim Picasso’s exact statements about her Client Crystal Sheffield, the mother of missing child Haleigh Cummings. The entire transcript can be found on the Art Harris website. A link is posted at the bottom of these quotes of the exact words of Crystal Sheffield’s lawyer Kim Picazio.
Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield, Marie Griffis and where their focus was in the time Haleigh Cummings had just gone missing.
In fact, days before the child went missing, Crystal had been served with a Motion for Contempt and a notice to appear in court for failure to pay child support to the custodial parent. Crystal had paid less than one thousand dollars ($1.000) of her child support
obligation since 2005. Of course, in the initial months of Haleigh’s disappearance, the last thing that I thought was appropriate would be to seek a modification of child support based on the fact that one child had been abducted. At all times, Marie Griffis felt we should file a court action lowering the amount Crystal was to pay to Ronald Cummings for support. Such an action was, in my opinion, highly inappropriate while investigators were still actively seeking to find little Haleigh and 0bring her home safely.
They (Crystal and her family) firmly believed that the family’s telephones and homes were being wire tapped, and that they were under surveillance by authorities, the media, and the Cummings family. The picture that was initially presented to me upon my entry into the case was much different than what I later learned to be factually true Marie Griffis. Marie was at all times outspoken, demanding, and extremely controlling of Crystal. She insisted that certain aspects of the case be divulged to the media. Mostly, this information related to negative rumors about Ronald Cummings. I learned that Marie Griffis had already begun a rather formal and publicized campaign for donations for her family. When I first arrived in Satsuma, I noted a handwritten poster at the family’s Haleigh Tent advertising a raffle for a Ford Expedition to take place on March 16, 2009. Further, the family and their friends had organized charity events in Haleigh’s honor at local businesses, set out donation jugs in town and at the tent, ordered tee shirts, pins and other trinkets with Haleigh’s picture and information displayed, and were selling these items for a profit to locals and tourists. All proceeds were, at that juncture, unaccounted for to my knowledge, and were being spent as they came in by the Crystal and Marie Griffis.By early May, 2009, I was informed by Marie that all funds from donations had been spent by the family Marie Griffis expressed her desire to form a nonprofit organization to seek donations from the public. I became aware that Marie had already been in negotiations with a concert promoter to hold a concert event to honor Haleigh, and to gain contributions and funds. . Ihighly disagreed with such organized efforts to raise money in the name of the search for Haleigh Cummings. Crystal and Marie never funded one searvh for Haleigh Cummings and paid NONE of the costs of the Haleighbug Center. Kim Picazio paid for the Haleighbug Center. Crystal and Marie kept all the money for the “searches” Crystal’s seeking of donations was insidious, and was an attempt to make a living off her own missing child

Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield and the custody issues with Ron Cummings over Junior and Haleigh Cummings.
Upon reviewing the court file, I found that my client had not been completely honest with me regarding her involvement in the Paternity proceedings of 2005. Affidavit of Service of
the original Petition for to Establish Paternity, personally served on Crystal Sheffield. Crystal then missed the Final Hearing.I realized that I had not been given thorough or accurate information regarding the procedural history of the paternity action. The procedures followed by the Court were standard. Crystal had had her day in Court, and had lost – fair and square. Crystal and her family, in an effort to raise her public image, had told numerous media outlets that the only reason that she did not have custody of her children was that she was not served with court papers, and had lost custody by default. Also, she claimed on national television that Ronald had kidnapped the children, and that his family, through their collusion and “connections” in the courthouse, made sure that Ronald retained custody of the children. This claim was simply untrue, and I was wholly unwilling to corroborate their previous version of the court file. I spent numerous meetings with Crystal and her mother, explaining that I could not attest facts that were untrue to the media, or to anyone else. At that time,I believe that a wedge began to form between Marie Griffis and I.
Kim Picasso on Crystal Sheffield and her drug abuse issues.
Crystal’s former private investigator William Staubs entered into a contract for investigative work with Crystal’s Father, Johnny Sheffield. Surprisingly, Crystal’s own father began doing interviews with avant guard media forums claiming that Crystal had a present drug problem, and was in need of rehabilitation. ,
Crystal Sheffield suffered a seizure while driving her vehicle with her infant daughter
in the car. Upon learning of the car accident, I was then informed by Crystal’s fiancé
for the first time that Crystal had been previously instructed not to drive her vehicle by her
primary care physician, as she had suffered seizures in the past. Unbeknownst to me, Crystal’s father had come upon the scene of her car accident to assist his daughter. Crystal’s Father has allegedly executed a sworn affidavit stating that when he came upon the scene of the accident, Crystal admitted to being on prescription pain medication (unprescribed), and gave her father the pills to hide from the police who were on their way to the accident site
The Department of Children and Families became aware of the allegations of drug use by Crystal. DCF requested a random toxicology test of Crystal Sheffield, during the course of their investigation, as they found it relevant to investigate Crystal’s fitness as a parent.
At that time, in June 2009, I learned from DCF that Crystal’s infant daughter, Chloe,
not even one (1) year of age, had been born with illegal narcotics in her system due to
Crystal’s drug use during her pregnancy. .
I felt as if I was only being told relevant information by the family, after a fiasco
had occurred. I could not represent a client who was not being honest with me, and was
taking illegal drugs. To make matters worse, In April 2009, Crystal admitted to me that
she had taken unprescribed pain medication. Further, her mother, Marie Griffis, reported
to me that Crystal had stolen her step-father’s pain medication after he had surgery in April.
There was evidence of her recent drug use and driving while under the influence of unprescribed pain medication. Further, her own Father had strongly represented to the media that he would testify that she was not fit to care for her children, due to her consistent drug use.
Despite Marie Griffis demanding I file a modification proceeding to seek custody of Crystal’s son in Ronald Cummings’ care, I was not willing to lie to the Court, and I did not feel that such an action would be successful. Marie Griffis became increasingly angered at my hesitancy to file a court action
for a change of custody. In good faith,was simply not willing to file such a pleading,
knowing my client was using drugs.,I informed Crystal and Marie on several occasions
of my recommendations and my opinions, but it was met with anger and frustration. There were many times that I requested private meetings with my client alone, as otherwise, her mother would insert her own feelings and demands on me and the case strategy, leaving Crystal’s feelings and desires unheard and discarded.

Kim Picazio On Crystal Sheffield and her involvement with her children Junior and Haleigh Cummings.
Crystal had never complained about her complete lack of involvement in her children’s lives since 2005. She did not attend doctors or dentist appointments, or even know who their medical care providers were. She did not ever visit the children during the week, even though her Final Judgment provided that the alternating weekends were a minimum visitation schedule, and permitted her to see the children duringthe week upon notice. Crystal did not speak with her children over the telephone during the week, and her only contact with them was roughly four (4) days per month on alternating weekends. Crystal had not been involved in Haleigh’s school, school functions, and did not even know what school Ronald, Jr. would be attending in the Fall of 2009.
Kim Picazio on Crystal Sheffield and the police investigation.
Although I gave specific recommendations and guidance to Crystal to call the Sheriff’s
Office once per week to check on the status of Haleigh’s case, she failed to do so.
I do not believe she called the Sheriff’s Office for a status report on a single occasion
during my representation.
It was my understanding that Crystal was not a prime suspect in the case.
I attempted to persuade the family that we needed to heed the directives of law enforcement. Unfortunately, my recommendations were met with great resistance and anger by Marie Griffis

This was due to the fact that their animosity toward Ronald Cummings had previously resulted in family members and friends erupting to reporters, cursing, and present as vindictive. Such public animosity and unbridled blame did not serve Crystal’s interests, or make good impressions on the law enforcement team that were investigating Haleigh’s disappearance.

cent, I di know about Blue Moon’s case and I have seen documentation to prove her story is true. Her family & friend were victims of her sherriff’s dept….BIG TIME!!! It has been 5 yrs and is just now about to be brought out into the open. The sherriff deputy that caused a young man’s death by road rage type senario, was arrested just after for sexually assaulting young men by telling them he was also a med tech. After the crash, where the car was split into 2 (actually 3) peices, these young men started to call in with their complaints against him. Until they all got together and did so, I’m pretty sure they were terrified to tell. I mean he did actually end up killing one of his victims. There were other witnesses to the fact that he didn’t turn on sirens or lights during the chase, did not identify himself as an officer, just chased them until they crashed and one boy died as a result. Then he had another officer come out and take his car away BEFORE any other LE got there. I know this to be true due to newspaper reports at that time as well as recent reports about how the LE is CURRENTLY under investigation for the cover-up. GO get em!!! I hope that’s not too much info BLue Moon.
I too live in a county rife with corrupt LE. One night my brother was going to his girlfriend’s house. She works as a bartender, so he sits with her until closeing and they leave at the same time, seperate cars. Sometimes he leaves just a few minutes earlier and meets her at her house. This night, he left just a little ahead of her. As he traveled a long dark back-road he approached a stop sign. There was already a small pick-up (ranger type) stopped at the sign. After about 2 or 3 minutes the truck never took off or moved. So my bro gets out to see if the person is alright. He approaches the truck to find a man literally passed out drunk behind the wheel. As he tries to wake the guy to see if someone can come and get him, notice he didn’t try to cause any trouble, didn’t make any phone calls to LE, he didn’t even have a cell phone as he refuses to carry one. As he’s leaning in to try to help the guy a LE cruiser pulls up behind him. The officer walks up and my bro starts to tell him what was going on and that the guy needs someone to come and get him. He doesn’t say that he thinks there should be charges filed, as a matter of fact he tells the officer, who is in full uniform, that he’s willing to just let the guy go without trouble if someone would just come and get him. The officer literally SHOVES my bro out of the way, tells him the drunk man is an OFF-DUTY officer, to go away and MIND HIS OWN BUSINESS!!!! As a concerned citizen who was trying to help keep a drunk driver out from behind the wheel, he was told he had no rights whatsoever and to keep his mouth shut and move along! That is just one example and a small one.
I did notice how both Ron & CJ both were complaining that PCSO “wouldn’t do their
job(s)”.

Jan Barrett – BNN Editor

And why would they take her in?? I don’t think it was because they felt sorry for her.

Where is Misty’s home/living with whom?
Ronnie charged with what?
Why is Misty always the one that has to file charges… cause it’s her phone!?! The main threats were against Ron.

I think that there was something more going on with Misty/CJ. He sounds like a jilted lover.

Yes, it is good news… didn’t we all just discuss interview tactics last night. Hmmmm !!

Misty did confirm the Jone’s hasn’t contacted her since that road incident. She did confirmed on the show that she lived with Charles Jones for a short time after leaving Ron. Her lawyer didn’t allow some questions to be asked by LEvi up front, so he had to back off according to him, Simon should be updating us here too about both shows today.

The calls will be interesting. Cool for LEvi to have the exclusive Misty on air, eh?

Really, I didn’t know that… did you listen, if so, what was your take on the calls?

I saw it!! pm

I’m spilling it all very soon!! You know where to read it at!

I’m not buying what LE is selling any longer. I don’t appreciate the way Misty was treated on this emergency call by the operator. Nor do I appreciate those that inserted themselves and did lots of damage to the mindset of this case, swayed opinions, and didn’t make Haleigh the priority, but their own vendettas and agendas. Makes me sick with disgust. I wish Ron and family would start hiring some aggressive attornies, civil rights groups, victims advocates, and private investigators and go after this case with full force. Bring in the media and start exposing this for what it is.

Catching up… so if CJ’s 911 call was staged… what about Ron’s and Misty’s. What Have I Missed? Are we saying the incident did NOT happen???

This is crazy. Blue, do you know any of the players in this case? Do you live in Florida? Do you have info. to prove LE lack and incompetance more than what we see?

Then PCSO is in serious dereliction of duty.
It was clear from the start that this was an emergency involving two children and the other car was still behind them. Obviously the dispatcher didn’t give a hoot about that. If she did she should have said, “But I’m sending a car out…” or something. If anything had happened to R, M or the children it would be on PCSO as far as I’m concerned.

But I do not understand why you are connecting Misty’s 911 call to the question of pressing charges. There is a lot that happens in between. AND Misty was calling for immediate help to stop the road rage. THAT was the issue – not what might happen later.
–
You also said:
“If the police had shown up there would have been a report with their names on it.”

That’s right. But that’s not on a publicly recorded and immediately broadcast worldwide phone call. Misty has heard both her other 911 calls on the air before. But it’s different when you’re talking in person to the cops.

You said: “She told Misty that she didn’t have to give her name and then RON & MISTY decided they no longer needed help IF they had to give their names. Please post the audio clip of the operator refusing them help.”
—
That was not the flow/order of the conversation. The key difference between your interpretation and mine is what the dispatcher said just before Misty said, “Nevermind.” I put an X next to that line below:
—
2:06 Dispatcher “So what’s you name?”

2:13 Misty “Do I have to give you my name, I don’t really want to do that.”

2:15 Dispatcher: “He ran you off the road…with your kids in the car!”

2:20 Misty “ummm…

2:23 Dispatcher “I mean you don’t have to leave your name but…”

2:25 Misty “No it’s just going to give us more problems. They’re just gonna harass us and we don’t want that. We want this person…”

X 2:30 Dispatcher interrupts Misty and says: “Okay, the only way we can stop this is if we see them driving wreckless…if we observe them driving wreckless.”

2:38 Misty “Ok, then never mind then.”

2:39 Dispatcher “You mean you don’t want to…I mean…ok”

—-
The key to me is what the dispatcher said at 2:30. That is when Misty gave up. It was not about the name. It was because the dispatcher said the only way they could help was if LE witnessed it.

If the dispatcher had said “the only way we can help is if you give us your name,” that might be another story.

The dispatcher never said that she was going to (or had) sent help. And how could she? She never asked what kind of car Misty was in. (She asked CJ for his phone number and what kind of car he was driving).

When Misty said, “Nevermind,” (AFTER the dispatcher said the only way we can stop this is if we see it) I think the dispatcher should have said, “You mean you do not want us to send a car to you?” or something like that. It would have helped clear things up about whether LE was going to respond or not.

At that point, I believe (and Misty believed) that no help would be coming – and how could it when LE didn’t even know what kind of car Misty was in?

thank you for the link. sounds like a lot of people are determined to make things better.

what has been done to sarah is unbearable to think about. and how many other hearts has this sicko damaged by taking sarah. her family, friends, neighbors, classmates and anyone who knew sarah.

i hope pinkey and her family are doing well.

This part is very true. Rather than “cop an attitude” about Misty not wanting to give her name, she should have just kept asking other questions to keep her on the line.

“The call was mere seconds long, the operator refused to send help”

The call was 126 seconds long, that’s not exactly “a few”. The operator did not refuse to help them. She told Misty that she didn’t have to give her name and then RON & MISTY decided they no longer needed help IF they had to give their names. Please post the audio clip of the operator refusing them help. After they said Never MInd she even asked her if she was sure. The most she did was allow the call to end with Misty being unclear as to what she had told her. IMO

I’m tired of hearing about the “rights” of these criminals. I want much harsher sentences for hurting children. That’s the first place the law fails us and the second is letting them out early.

As MD State Sen Nancy Jacobs said (and I paraphrase here) “Of course they are going to behave in prison. There are no children in prison!” So getting out of jail early for good behavior should not apply to these horrid offenders. PLUS what IS the appropriate punishment for violating or seriously harming a child? Judges and juries need to decide that it has to be a LONG prison sentence.

I agree wholeheartedly with what the article says. I’d only add that such offenders should serve their entire sentence and not get off on probation or parole.Perhaps that is included in the author’s point of view but I want to point it out anyway because that’s one of the main, critical places the system breaks down and very often the public does not even know it.

Another sleepless night for me… think I will head to Jack N the box… luv their chocolate cake.

But I can’t agree that any of her 911 calls prove what you say.

The 911 call when she was robbed showed exactly the kind of emotion that I’d feel if I’d just been pushed around and my purse stolen. That call was as real as it gets to me.

And the last one – to me – shows her to be anything but determined. The call was mere seconds long, the operator refused to send help and Misty gave up. If she’d been “determined” she might have argued or begged or at least continued the call somehow but she gave up.

I read your post Kool Look @ 11:37 pm and just the other day we were discussing the possibility of someone from Crystal’s side being responsible (for various reasons).

I’ve always wanted to keep that theory on the table but I have not gone so far as to try to figure out specifically who may have done it.

Some people have theories about that and I see some have posted them above. Very interesting possibilities and no reason to rule them out (until we know if any have been completely investigated which I seriously doubt).

http://www.delmarvanow.com/article/20100103/OPINION01/1030342/-1/newsfront2/A-life-cut-short-a-fitting-tribute delmarvanow (The Daily Times)
Maryland 1-3-2010

“A life cut short, a fitting tribute”
‘Sarah’s Law’ should focus on protecting innocent children

“Top 10 stories of 2009 (No. 1): Where’s Haleigh?”

Misty may or may not know what happened the night Haleigh went missing. But make no mistake, Misty is a very skilled & manipulative person. After listening to this latest 911 call she placed, I firmly believe the girl is a master at her game. First call to 911 when Haleigh went missing, she portrayed herself as dazed & baffled. Call #2 she portrayed herself as the wounded victim and what a performance that was. This latest call portrays her as a determined individual, which is terrifying, because Misty is gaining strength, not weakness. She has guys fighting over her, still not employed, she is loving life right now. She loves the media & now the spotlight is back on her, just the way she likes it. Too bad it can’t seem to be on Haleigh instead.

I don’t agree at all with what you have said and described concerning Misty and Ron. Why can’t they be together? Where’s it written that Ron and Misty shalt not be together? Maybe they love one another. Everyone else be’s with the ones they love, why do we have a right to demand this young couple the right to the pursuit of love and happiness? Matter of factly, it is written each and everyone of us has that right according to the laws of the land and The Word of God. If these two care for each other, guilty or not, let us not stand in the way, nor tear asunder. For if their guilty, let us as citizens and the authorities properly punish them, whatever a group of their peers and Judge decides, I’m Kool with that. If their innocent, God forbid those that stand in their ways. We ought not stick our noses in the personal love lives of others. We surely wouldn’t want the same to happen inside our very own lives.

My problem Tapped, is I’m not labeling Misty and Ron as liars just because someone else says so. I’ve not seen or heard any lies that can be proven towards these two. I have however seen in print and on tv interviews many lying on them. Setting them up to fail, connive against them and family. I’ve seen too many for my liking in authority say one thing to only learn I was mis-led and lied to over again.

I’m no hater, and until somebody can give me some proof these two are involved in harming Haleigh in any way, I’m going to watch without judgement and keep an open mind on all suspects, which is everyone except a small few. I appreciate your thoughts and look forward to reading more, you appear to be well involved in learning about this case, and caring for Haleigh. I agree with those great attributes in you.

One thing that caught my eye interestingly, it’s awfully coincidental, we have this road incident with R and M, the reasons why PCSO wouldn’t release any info to native alien in their request and inquiries into Haleigh’s case that their handling. Their reasoning along with accusing Native of threatening them to FDLE is the “timing”. The “timing” of this new incident, which I can accept as just coincidental, but not the news release by Greenwood stating “We now have new information in this case that may help us solve it”. Now isn’t that convenient.

Native receives their denial letter to not abide in the sunshine laws for the state of Florida, but in that denial comes another problem for the pcso. That is they then fall under new guidelines and rules, and are accelerated up to a new level of authority and rules. Thus, they had to either disclose the case information to native, the person requesting said information, or make an arrest, imminenet arrest or show cause as to movement forward towards a near future arrest.

With Greenwoods statement, in now covers all their timely bases just beautifully, doesn’t it? Does anyone see hinky written all over this latest move on behalf of pcso? I do. I think this is getting deep folks. Because now according to Native, the Attorney generals office can now get involved once the request of information has been denied by the pcso to the inquiring hopeful recepient named Native, a member here who has shared the documentation and posts keeping us updated in the forum Jan has created here. Go join and read native thread. Interesting and brings to light some interesting facts, procedures and possible clues inside the case and where it’s headed, or not headed so to speak.

Yes Folks, very well could be some hush hushing going on inside this investigation by those in authority, sure is looking that way. Any thoughts people?

For those going off to bed, good night, God Bless you, sweet colorful dreams dancing in the clouds with your loved ones in Peace.

Lisa Brooks left Satsuma in March 2009 (I think) and moved to Wise, VA.

Amber Brooks was with NayNay, Misty and WBG for their weekend of fun, prior to Haleigh’s disappearance. To hear NayNay’s version, she states Misty and Amber nearly came to blows at the party on the Saturday evening (7th Feb).

Alas it does not matter that Ron & Misty were together on this particular day as it is my firm belief they never truly parted. On paper, it appears they are finished. In reality, not so much.

Oh yea…BTW the site I was abused at was Websleuths. Their Site owner/adminstrator was in on it and tey had a “good squad” there that was VICIOUS! They have a lot of information there but at least 1/2 of it is “tainted”.