Credit cardholders are seeing extraordinary behavior out of the banks that issue the cards. Higher fees, higher interest rates, higher minimum payments, restriction of credit lines — they’re all coming now before card issuers are prevented from making arbitrary and instantaneous changes once the CARD law goes into effect.
So, as usually happens when government gets involved, the consumer gets screwed.
Some day I hope that politicians and consumer activists realize that increasing regulation almost never benefits the consumer in the way the law intends. Before CARD, consumers faced arbitrary increases in their interest rates and fees. The point, said the banks, was to insulate themselves from credit risk.
Now that CARD has been passed, consumers are seeing….arbitrary increases in their interest rates and fees. The point, said the banks…was to insulate themselves from credit risk. And since CARD restricts them from changing their credit terms without warning, they fear that poor consumer behavior — especially now in a tough economy — could severely impact their bottom line. Their solution? Rush the changes through now.
Even worse, at a time when people desperately need credit, CARD further restricts it.
Nice going.
So once again, consumers have the government to thank for meddling in overzealous regulation. Mind you, I’m no fan of credit card companies. However, when you corner a wild animal, expect it to fight for its life.
Those politicians eager to attack and restrict payday loans should consider this, as well. I’ve harped on what happens when you needlessly restrict credit — it always makes things worse for consumers. This has happened in North Carolina and Georgia, where payday loans were banned. Ask the people there how much money they’ve paid in overdraft protection since PDLs were outlawed.
They’ll have a thing or two to say about that, I’m sure.
















3 users commented in " Credit Card Shock? Blame the Government. "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a Trackback“Before CARD, consumers faced arbitrary increases in their interest rates and fees. The point, said the banks, was to insulate themselves from credit risk.”
“Now that CARD has been passed, consumers are seeing….arbitrary increases in their interest rates and fees. The point, said the banks…was to insulate themselves from credit risk.”
Sounds like business as usual. As much as I loath the government interfering in commerce, contract law is based on the assumption that the contracted parties have equal bargaining power. This is not true with credit card contracts. The banks have all the power except in two circumstances. One is class action law suits and the other is government intervention. Unfortunately both are fraught with the danger of unintendend consequences. At least with government intervention you have a better chance of getting a consistent set of rules. Courts can, and frequently do, make conflicting rulings.
I had a great credit score and a paid off credit card. The credit card company just reduced my available credit from 8000 to 1500 on a credit card that I’ve had for over ten years. All of this help from the credit card company actually lowered my credit score due to no fault of my own. Sometimes, regulation has consequences unforseen by Congress. I’m glad they can protect the people who refuse to be responsible and can put laws in place that punish those of us who choose to be.
It’s not always about consumer responsibility as we all know that things happen that are not in our control. People lose their jobs or get demoted, or have life-changing events and unexpected expenses. So, if they once had good credit, unfortunately, paying on a credit card may no longer be a priority-thus ruining their credit. Consumer protection in the form of education is preferable but Congress functions under the assumption that the American people as an entity aren’t capable of making decisions that are good for them, which is more than insulting. If I make a decision that affects myself and my family, I don’t expect the government to intervene unless mal-intent were involved. Congress is so consumed by what their visions are that they completely ignore the possible consequences of their actions.
Leave A Reply