<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OJ Simpson: He just doesn&#8217;t get it!</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Randy Cox</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1480317</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Cox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1480317</guid>
		<description>OJ's current situation should be decided upon the merits of the current case against him.

As to the murder case that has been decided.  As the murder case was happening and afterward many polls were taken all over the country.

Mostly blacks thought he was not guilty, and whites were divided.  I never heard a poll where more than 60% of whites thought he was guilty.

No media ever pointed this out, but there is not one court in our land that would convict for murder or any other felony when 40% of the jury thought he was innocent.

With 1/90 Americans locked up in jail, do you people hate America so much you think we should start convicting based on 60% jury vote?  Maybe you think it should have happened only for OJ.  

Now who really wants special treatment for OJ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ&#8217;s current situation should be decided upon the merits of the current case against him.</p>
<p>As to the murder case that has been decided.  As the murder case was happening and afterward many polls were taken all over the country.</p>
<p>Mostly blacks thought he was not guilty, and whites were divided.  I never heard a poll where more than 60% of whites thought he was guilty.</p>
<p>No media ever pointed this out, but there is not one court in our land that would convict for murder or any other felony when 40% of the jury thought he was innocent.</p>
<p>With 1/90 Americans locked up in jail, do you people hate America so much you think we should start convicting based on 60% jury vote?  Maybe you think it should have happened only for OJ.  </p>
<p>Now who really wants special treatment for OJ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: live</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1473602</link>
		<dc:creator>live</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1473602</guid>
		<description>Guilty, guilty, guilty — and everyone knows it. A murderer of two people got off the hook because of this country’s obsession with race — this was a classic case race-based jury nullification — and because of the ineptitude of the prosecution. Chris Darden’s insane idea to have Simpson try on the gloves found at the murder scene without knowing if they would fit was the final straw that broke their case. The gloves had not only shrunk from the blood, from being wet and dried, and from all the testing, but Simpson wore latex gloves when he was trying them on, which only compounded the snug fit and gave the impression of planted evidence.

Vut a country !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty, guilty, guilty — and everyone knows it. A murderer of two people got off the hook because of this country’s obsession with race — this was a classic case race-based jury nullification — and because of the ineptitude of the prosecution. Chris Darden’s insane idea to have Simpson try on the gloves found at the murder scene without knowing if they would fit was the final straw that broke their case. The gloves had not only shrunk from the blood, from being wet and dried, and from all the testing, but Simpson wore latex gloves when he was trying them on, which only compounded the snug fit and gave the impression of planted evidence.</p>
<p>Vut a country !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1406347</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1406347</guid>
		<description>Um, actually I am not trying to "judge" anyone nor am I running around bottled up with hate. I was only trying to point out the bullying factor and the narcassistic personality that OJ has. While people sit around and say "nothing can be done about bullying" or "you cannot make laws for that or try and stop it" I get up and do something about it. My whole intent is to point out what many miss: the abuse that comes from this problem. As for the other stuff, its nothing I am interested in touching upon.

Thanks again everyone for your comments. Have a good evening. 

Take Care,
Elizabeth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, actually I am not trying to &#8220;judge&#8221; anyone nor am I running around bottled up with hate. I was only trying to point out the bullying factor and the narcassistic personality that OJ has. While people sit around and say &#8220;nothing can be done about bullying&#8221; or &#8220;you cannot make laws for that or try and stop it&#8221; I get up and do something about it. My whole intent is to point out what many miss: the abuse that comes from this problem. As for the other stuff, its nothing I am interested in touching upon.</p>
<p>Thanks again everyone for your comments. Have a good evening. </p>
<p>Take Care,<br />
Elizabeth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unbiased</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1405387</link>
		<dc:creator>unbiased</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 18:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1405387</guid>
		<description>I think its a sad day when people would convict and judge a person for the exact same thing they would do.Its no mistake that the law has this provision of the apeal process its because under a normal person in this case no matter where from they would do n the same thing.Now I am not racest or male female biased but I feel right is right and wrong is wrong . And I do feel you reap what you sew so we should go through the process as the law states and at the end of the day if he free hes free.But to say he got away with it is never our judgement its gods at that point and weather it be by bad dreams of guilt in which we all have in which he feels himself he needs to finish himself off when hes 90 or so years then so be it. My point is I am sick and tired of all you people who claim to be so rightous and out for a true justice cause. when you as well as i knowits prue hate that drives you. If you dont beleive me check your selves. ask yourself how many other people have you worked so hard to convict how many other true vicitims have you put time and effort into helping many kids need help who did nothing wrong but be born. you take up for two people who have been murdered oj aside who were commiting adultry doing drugs etc... any of which wouldve lead to them dying early in life if judge by true laws of life and the bible.we used to stone cheaters remember that? and cocaine addicts dont live long.And yes killers do and should pay but we shouldnt join them by breaking the rules by giving someone life plus eight years to boot for trying to get their own stolen items back from criminals no shots fired no battery.I remember when that was legal o wait it still is in texas!lol .WE MUST DO AND BE BETTER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its a sad day when people would convict and judge a person for the exact same thing they would do.Its no mistake that the law has this provision of the apeal process its because under a normal person in this case no matter where from they would do n the same thing.Now I am not racest or male female biased but I feel right is right and wrong is wrong . And I do feel you reap what you sew so we should go through the process as the law states and at the end of the day if he free hes free.But to say he got away with it is never our judgement its gods at that point and weather it be by bad dreams of guilt in which we all have in which he feels himself he needs to finish himself off when hes 90 or so years then so be it. My point is I am sick and tired of all you people who claim to be so rightous and out for a true justice cause. when you as well as i knowits prue hate that drives you. If you dont beleive me check your selves. ask yourself how many other people have you worked so hard to convict how many other true vicitims have you put time and effort into helping many kids need help who did nothing wrong but be born. you take up for two people who have been murdered oj aside who were commiting adultry doing drugs etc&#8230; any of which wouldve lead to them dying early in life if judge by true laws of life and the bible.we used to stone cheaters remember that? and cocaine addicts dont live long.And yes killers do and should pay but we shouldnt join them by breaking the rules by giving someone life plus eight years to boot for trying to get their own stolen items back from criminals no shots fired no battery.I remember when that was legal o wait it still is in texas!lol .WE MUST DO AND BE BETTER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ray sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1405005</link>
		<dc:creator>ray sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 00:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1405005</guid>
		<description>OJ is right where he needs to be for a real long time, he doesn't deserve another break.
  He should be happy he isn't sitting on death
row in a 10 ft x 10 ft cell at San Quintin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ is right where he needs to be for a real long time, he doesn&#8217;t deserve another break.<br />
  He should be happy he isn&#8217;t sitting on death<br />
row in a 10 ft x 10 ft cell at San Quintin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m2c</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1404128</link>
		<dc:creator>m2c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 21:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1404128</guid>
		<description>Get your facts straight, Mr. Nevadajoe. I did not say he was not entitled to seek bail. What IS wrong with this picture is that OJ seems to think he can commit crimes and not go to jail for it - that he is "entitled" to freedom after being convicted of these crimes. That's the attitude I object to and I am glad that the court did not agree with him.
Of course he's entitled to persue any legal action available to him. That's obvious.
But in my opinion, he is not entitled to commit crimes and not be punished for it (not be in jail for it).

If you think the punishment is too severe - which you apparently do - that's another subject altogether. The only thing I said in relation to that was "Often the ringleaders of a crime like this are given tougher sentences because without that leadership the crime would not have been committed. So I can even understand the longer sentence."  Makes sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get your facts straight, Mr. Nevadajoe. I did not say he was not entitled to seek bail. What IS wrong with this picture is that OJ seems to think he can commit crimes and not go to jail for it - that he is &#8220;entitled&#8221; to freedom after being convicted of these crimes. That&#8217;s the attitude I object to and I am glad that the court did not agree with him.<br />
Of course he&#8217;s entitled to persue any legal action available to him. That&#8217;s obvious.<br />
But in my opinion, he is not entitled to commit crimes and not be punished for it (not be in jail for it).</p>
<p>If you think the punishment is too severe - which you apparently do - that&#8217;s another subject altogether. The only thing I said in relation to that was &#8220;Often the ringleaders of a crime like this are given tougher sentences because without that leadership the crime would not have been committed. So I can even understand the longer sentence.&#8221;  Makes sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NevadaJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403994</link>
		<dc:creator>NevadaJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403994</guid>
		<description>I could care less if OJ is a bully, as he has no impact on my life. I do care when the State of Nevada is the bully, as that can have an impact on all of us. I have no feelings for OJ, good or bad and could care less about him. M2c statement that he was not entitled to seek bail is wrong. Anyone is entitled to seek bail on appeal, under our rule of law. And almost everyone does when a appeal is accepted by the higher court. It was the three Supreme Court justices (appeals court) who brought this into the news by accepting verbal arguments. The the real problem here and the bigger picture ... emotions get in the way of true justice and when that happens, we all suffer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could care less if OJ is a bully, as he has no impact on my life. I do care when the State of Nevada is the bully, as that can have an impact on all of us. I have no feelings for OJ, good or bad and could care less about him. M2c statement that he was not entitled to seek bail is wrong. Anyone is entitled to seek bail on appeal, under our rule of law. And almost everyone does when a appeal is accepted by the higher court. It was the three Supreme Court justices (appeals court) who brought this into the news by accepting verbal arguments. The the real problem here and the bigger picture &#8230; emotions get in the way of true justice and when that happens, we all suffer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403852</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 02:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403852</guid>
		<description>m2c, you got exactly what I was saying in this. It was not so much the other stuff about OJ that I was pointing out but the fact that he is a bully. As a bully, he carries a sense of entitlement and believes rules and regulations do not apply to him. By him even seeking this appeal, it is only showing that he just does not get it and he should be entitled to get out. 

Thanks for the comments everyone. Have a good week :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>m2c, you got exactly what I was saying in this. It was not so much the other stuff about OJ that I was pointing out but the fact that he is a bully. As a bully, he carries a sense of entitlement and believes rules and regulations do not apply to him. By him even seeking this appeal, it is only showing that he just does not get it and he should be entitled to get out. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comments everyone. Have a good week <img src='http://www.bloggernews.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m2c</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403794</link>
		<dc:creator>m2c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403794</guid>
		<description>J2 and NevadaJoe: I believe what Ms. Bennett is saying is that OJ's outlook on life is that HE is special and deserves special treatment. That he has a narcisstic "rules don't apply to me" attitude. I can see that.
Often the ringleader of a crime like this are given tougher sentences because without that leadership the crime would not have been committed.  So I can even understand the longer sentence. 
But all that aside, what OJ was trying to do this time was post bail and get out of jail permanently - like nothing happened. THAT he is not entitled to. But as Ms. Bennett pointed out, that's OJ's self-view - he's ENTITLED!  More so than anyone. We say, "not so."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J2 and NevadaJoe: I believe what Ms. Bennett is saying is that OJ&#8217;s outlook on life is that HE is special and deserves special treatment. That he has a narcisstic &#8220;rules don&#8217;t apply to me&#8221; attitude. I can see that.<br />
Often the ringleader of a crime like this are given tougher sentences because without that leadership the crime would not have been committed.  So I can even understand the longer sentence.<br />
But all that aside, what OJ was trying to do this time was post bail and get out of jail permanently - like nothing happened. THAT he is not entitled to. But as Ms. Bennett pointed out, that&#8217;s OJ&#8217;s self-view - he&#8217;s ENTITLED!  More so than anyone. We say, &#8220;not so.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NevadaJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403791</link>
		<dc:creator>NevadaJoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403791</guid>
		<description>I agree with J2. I do not believe OJ is innocent in California. However, the Nevada judicial system, did a little wink and a nod ... 'we'll make him pay.' That mentality is just wrong. I believe in the law and to watch what happened was disgusting. The prosecutors and Judge should be ashamed of how the case was handled. Let the good lord handle OJ, but don't set bad precedence that can be used in future cases. A CA Judge recently ruled that these items were indeed OJ's &#38; Nevada gave him minimum 9 years for retrieving his stolen property. Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with J2. I do not believe OJ is innocent in California. However, the Nevada judicial system, did a little wink and a nod &#8230; &#8216;we&#8217;ll make him pay.&#8217; That mentality is just wrong. I believe in the law and to watch what happened was disgusting. The prosecutors and Judge should be ashamed of how the case was handled. Let the good lord handle OJ, but don&#8217;t set bad precedence that can be used in future cases. A CA Judge recently ruled that these items were indeed OJ&#8217;s &amp; Nevada gave him minimum 9 years for retrieving his stolen property. Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J2goblue</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403783</link>
		<dc:creator>J2goblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/122161#comment-1403783</guid>
		<description>Ms. Bennet, I was searching for an update on the Nevada OJ Simpson case when I found your article.  Wow!  The justice system is set-up to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.  I truly believe that OJ murdered his wex-wife and Ron Goldman, but he was found not guilty.  We cannot use that case against him nevada, andeven if we did, the merits of that case do not warrant the vedict or sentence.  Be careful when you applaud the Nevada case, OJ did not have a gun, but was present.  None of the other suspects received near the sentence that he did, and two of them had the gun.  I do not respect OJ or his actions, but we must follow the law, and because his non-guilty verdict was unpoplular, i have no problem with bloggers and citizens writing or protesting about it...  But judges and jurors need to follow the law.  I suspect OJ will win the appeal and at have his sentence reduced or opbtain a new trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Bennet, I was searching for an update on the Nevada OJ Simpson case when I found your article.  Wow!  The justice system is set-up to protect the innocent and punish the guilty.  I truly believe that OJ murdered his wex-wife and Ron Goldman, but he was found not guilty.  We cannot use that case against him nevada, andeven if we did, the merits of that case do not warrant the vedict or sentence.  Be careful when you applaud the Nevada case, OJ did not have a gun, but was present.  None of the other suspects received near the sentence that he did, and two of them had the gun.  I do not respect OJ or his actions, but we must follow the law, and because his non-guilty verdict was unpoplular, i have no problem with bloggers and citizens writing or protesting about it&#8230;  But judges and jurors need to follow the law.  I suspect OJ will win the appeal and at have his sentence reduced or opbtain a new trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

