Wow! Its been 12 years since the death of Princess Diana on August 31, 1997. Can you believe how fast time flies? It seems like yesterday I was waking up to read the morning news to find her death sprawled all over the front page. As I was always a fan, I was saddened by this. A woman who had selflessly given herself to help others in time of need. She did a lot for humanity and I certainly miss her presence here on earth.
As I think of Princess Diana’s death, I think of those left behind. Family who loved her dearly like her two sons Prince William and Prince Harry. They were so young when this tragedy occurred. Fortunately, they still had their father but nobody can take the place of a mother. It saddens me that she would never see them finish school and grow up into young men, marry and have their own children. She was entitled to this and was denied it. You see, her death did not have to occur. She could have grown into middle age, continued her work helping others around the world and watch her sons grow into men. At the time of her death, she and her companion Dodi Al-Fayed may have had a chance to see more of one another and could have married at some point. However, these are things we will never know.
While many will say or have their theories on her death, I believe the paparazzi murdered her. For years, they just could not leave her alone or let her be. Anywhere she would go, they would be not far behind. Pictures among pictures appeared in tabloids around the world of her and those close to her. Rumors and lies were printed as well. People just could not get enough of her. At the same time, Diana just wanted to live a decent life. I am sure she understood she was a public figure, however, was it such a crime if she wanted privacy to spend time with her family and friends? You see, she did not have that luxury because the paparazzi just would not allow it. On the night she and Dodi were killed, the paparazzi were everywhere. They followed every move that was made by the couple and it got to be such a pain that they had to sneak out of the building to avoid them. However, the paparazzi were one step ahead of her. They managed to follow her in her car which contained herself and three other men. The car was speeding quickly to avoid these bullies and managed to smash right into a concrete wall in a tunnel. Three of the four in the car were killed. If the paparazzi had left her alone, none of this would have happened and she still would have been with us today more than likely.
These paparazzi are stalkers, bullies and are dangerous. What they report is not news but vicious lies and they look to take pictures of celebrities at the worst possible time for a lot of money. They violate all possible laws within the community and are a hazard to everyone around them. Most importantly, they act without conscience and nobody seems to stop their dangerous behavior. Yet we continue to feed them by purchasing tabloids and other things. Since when is it news when Tyra Banks buys a banana in Ralph’s Grocery Store? Or when Zac Efron goes to the beach? Like me, you are probably thinking this is not news and its not. This is an invasion of privacy, infringement of constitutional rights and that life, liberty and pursuit of happiness that is promised to all of us in this nation. Some think that because they are celebrities, they owe us in this respect and should get over it and allow people to treat them this way. Folks, this is no way to live for anyone. Not being able to throw away a phone number written down because someone may go through their trash and sell it on eBay? These everyday occurrences in life are something we take for granted yet something they do not have. Think of that next time you believe you are entitled to know these things.
Please, visit the Paparazzi Reform Initiative to see how you can learn about the realities of these situations. These celebs should be able to go to Ralph’s, the beach or anywhere without the paparazzi on their tail. This is a form of Peer Abuse, stalking, violation of constitutional rights as well as human rights. After all, we would probably still have Princess Diana today if they had just let her live in peace. Something to think about…..
Elizabeth Bennett is the author of Peer Abuse Know More! Bullying From a Psychological Perspective. Please visit Peer Abuse Know More! to learn more.
9 users commented in " Remembering Princess Diana and those who Murdered her "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackWe would still have princess Diana today????? This is the U.S.A. The only princess’s we have are our daughters.
Sorry Simon, hope you are not a Royalist!!
Hi, Trapper! This article was written by Elizabeth Bennett not Simon. And I’ve gotten the impression that Simon doesn’t miss England much.
Elizabeth, I totally agree that “These paparazzi are stalkers, bullies and are dangerous!”
First, “paparazzi” is too glamorous a word to describe vultures, stalkers and bullies!
We should not call them that anymore.
This is general – not connected to Diana but to all the stuff that goes on everyday here in the US…
WHY isn’t there a law to prevent them (and their microphones and cameras) from getting any closer to someone than say 6 feet (in a public place)?
I can’t imagine how it feels to try to walk, totally surrounded by a shoving crowd and equipment and risk having a tooth knocked out by a microphone. Or trying to drive with the choice of staying completely still or running someone over! I think I’d run them over I really do!
If for no other reason than everyone’s physical safety there needs to be a law about this!
With today’s technology NO microphone OR camera needs to be within 10 feet (and that’s generous) in order to record sound or visual! THere is no need at ALL! It’s ridiculous! To me it’s the equivalent of “unlawful imprisonment.”
Oh and Trapper! A lot of Americans still love royalty. We don’t want to be ruled by them but we still love them – a la Jackie and John Kennedy – for example.
And millions of Americans got up before dawn to watch Diana’s wedding – and her funeral.
We do love Princesses (including our daughters!)
Yes Mrs.m2c, i know who wrote it, i just didn’t want Simon to think i was kicking the English in the b*alls!!
Oh, I gotcha, Trapper! Sorry about that!
well, you know,
1) if she wore a seat belt, she would have lived. The bodyguard in the front was wearing his, and he lived.
2) if they had “scooped and run” to the hospital, and did a CT scan or even a simple chest X ray, they would have been able to diagnose her torn pulmonary vein that killed her. Instead, they “stablized” her at the scene, taking over two hours…and she bled to death inside her chest before she got to the hospital.
but no one wants to point fingers at a lousy medical system.
Nancy – Actually I want to point a finger at the lousy medical system. I almost mentioned it here. I’ve been amazed (appalled is a better word) since the day this tragedy happened that her care was mis-handled SO badly and not much has been said about it. Does anyone know if this is “standard” in France? Loiter around the accident scene instead of rushing to the hospital? Good Lord. If anyone killed her it’s the French medical system.
The paparazzi didn’t kill her – lack of a seat belt (which she ususally always used), and the medical system in France killed her. The true person responsible is Mr. Fayad himself. Why don’t you check on how much security he has when he travels. The most famous woman in the world and you had 2 body guards who hadn’t slept in 2 days, no other cars to try to keep the pap. away. Why do you think he is SO adament about them being killed – he doesn’t want to be responsible for their deaths, when, in fact, he is.
Leave A Reply