<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An amazing defence of Nazism as &#8220;Rightist&#8221;</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121262</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 01:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: john bryans fontaine</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121262#comment-1300733</link>
		<dc:creator>john bryans fontaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121262#comment-1300733</guid>
		<description>Hitler only used the word 'socialism', because he believed that it was a right-wing term, and one that was identical to 'nationalism', hence national socialism:

..."1. 'National' and 'social' are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it 'National Socialist.' We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it. - Hitler, April, 1921</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hitler only used the word &#8217;socialism&#8217;, because he believed that it was a right-wing term, and one that was identical to &#8216;nationalism&#8217;, hence national socialism:</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8221;1. &#8216;National&#8217; and &#8217;social&#8217; are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it &#8216;National Socialist.&#8217; We said to ourselves that to be &#8216;national&#8217; means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be &#8217;social&#8217; means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it. - Hitler, April, 1921</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Darrell</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121262#comment-1296151</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121262#comment-1296151</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;what Greenie has ever expressed regret for the millions of lives lost to malaria in Africa because of the ban on DDT? &lt;/blockquote&gt;

More "greenies" work to save people from malaria -- enough to know that it's damnably difficult to say any person died from malaria due to a lack of DDT.  Malaria rates in Africa and Asia rose after the pharmaceuticals used to treat humans became ineffective, about 20 years after DDT spraying was slowed.  But DDT has been constantly available to fight malaria since 1946.  No one died due to a lack of DDT.  Many died because some people thought we could just poison Africa and make things okay, instead of having to work at improving the health care system.

Godwin's Law:  You lose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>what Greenie has ever expressed regret for the millions of lives lost to malaria in Africa because of the ban on DDT? </p></blockquote>
<p>More &#8220;greenies&#8221; work to save people from malaria &#8212; enough to know that it&#8217;s damnably difficult to say any person died from malaria due to a lack of DDT.  Malaria rates in Africa and Asia rose after the pharmaceuticals used to treat humans became ineffective, about 20 years after DDT spraying was slowed.  But DDT has been constantly available to fight malaria since 1946.  No one died due to a lack of DDT.  Many died because some people thought we could just poison Africa and make things okay, instead of having to work at improving the health care system.</p>
<p>Godwin&#8217;s Law:  You lose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

