Comments on: The holocaust museum killer was NOT a conservative http://www.bloggernews.net/121219 High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news. Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:02:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: John Bryans Fontaine http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1291377 John Bryans Fontaine Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:23:36 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1291377 Hitler believed that socialism was a right-wing ideology totally opposed to Marxism: http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/111hit1.html "1. 'National' and 'social' are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it 'National Socialist.' We said to ourselves that to be 'national' means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be 'social' means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it." - April 12th, 1921 Hitler believed that socialism was a right-wing ideology totally opposed to Marxism:

http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/111hit1.html

“1. ‘National’ and ’social’ are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it ‘National Socialist.’ We said to ourselves that to be ‘national’ means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be ’social’ means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it.” - April 12th, 1921

]]> By: LOL http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1288518 LOL Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:30:23 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1288518 Umm, yeah, you need to rethink your definitions of liberals, and even conservatives. This man is a racist, hate filled, twisted murderer. His politics are nothing more than his own messed up reality intruding into the civilized world. His views are so far removed from political importance, I have to shake my head that you try to make this about liberal/conservative or democrat/republican labels. Umm, yeah, you need to rethink your definitions of liberals, and even conservatives. This man is a racist, hate filled, twisted murderer. His politics are nothing more than his own messed up reality intruding into the civilized world.

His views are so far removed from political importance, I have to shake my head that you try to make this about liberal/conservative or democrat/republican labels.

]]> By: BrianO http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1287681 BrianO Fri, 12 Jun 2009 05:54:11 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1287681 Uhh...If you'd had the chance to see von Brunn's hateful website he frequently referred to the "Liberal/Jewry/Communist" triad. So, how many liberals hate "liberals". While he is certainly not a mainstream conservative, he considered himself a conservative. To deny it and say that he was a part of "the left" is Kool-Aide drinking propaganda at its worst. Uhh…If you’d had the chance to see von Brunn’s hateful website he frequently referred to the “Liberal/Jewry/Communist” triad.

So, how many liberals hate “liberals”.

While he is certainly not a mainstream conservative, he considered himself a conservative.

To deny it and say that he was a part of “the left” is Kool-Aide drinking propaganda at its worst.

]]> By: EllenG http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1287568 EllenG Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:50:06 +0000 http://www.bloggernews.net/121219#comment-1287568 I don't know much about your reputation for accurateness or your general investigations. I DO know that you are 100% WRONG when you state that Wesley Clark is anti-semitic. General Clark's father was Jewish, the General is fond of his Jewish family, and he highly respects the Jewish religion. For your information, several years ago he participated at an invocation at the Holocaust Museum. Your 'analysis' here is worthless. I don’t know much about your reputation for accurateness or your general investigations. I DO know that you are 100% WRONG when you state that Wesley Clark is anti-semitic. General Clark’s father was Jewish, the General is fond of his Jewish family, and he highly respects the Jewish religion.

For your information, several years ago he participated at an invocation at the Holocaust Museum.

Your ‘analysis’ here is worthless.

]]>