Here is what we know about him:
Von Brunn was known to the FBI as “as an anti-Semite and a white supremacist who had established websites that inspired hatred against African-Americans, Jews and others,” Persichini added…. Von Brunn has written books on Adolf Hitler as well as on his conspiracy theories and views on white superiority. In a recent posting on his blog he railed that “America is a Third-World racial garbage-dump - stupid, ignorant, dead-broke, and terminal”.
Just what part of that associates von Brunn with American conservatives? Nothing. So with whom DOES it associate him? Easy: Marx & Engels despised Jews and blacks too. Hitler was a socialist. The Soviets too persecuted Jews. The KKK were almost all Democrats. The most antisemitic statements coming out of US politics in the last few years have been from Democrats such as James Moran and Wesley Clark. Who is today the most prominent American polemicist against Israel? Jimmah Carter.
Who are they today who love America? Conservatives. Who are they who think America is rotten and in need of top to bottom reform? Democrats.
The whole tendency to think and talk in terms of race (such as “Jews”) is typical Leftist collectivism. Conservatives think in terms of individuals and individual liberty. Von Brunn had much in common with the Left and little or nothing in common with conservatives
(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, DISSECTING LEFTISM, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, GUN WATCH, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, EYE ON BRITAIN and Paralipomena . List of backup or “mirror” sites here or here — for readers in China or for everyone when blogspot is “down” or failing to update. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)
Loading ...
4 users commented in " The holocaust museum killer was NOT a conservative "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackI don’t know much about your reputation for accurateness or your general investigations. I DO know that you are 100% WRONG when you state that Wesley Clark is anti-semitic. General Clark’s father was Jewish, the General is fond of his Jewish family, and he highly respects the Jewish religion.
For your information, several years ago he participated at an invocation at the Holocaust Museum.
Your ‘analysis’ here is worthless.
Uhh…If you’d had the chance to see von Brunn’s hateful website he frequently referred to the “Liberal/Jewry/Communist” triad.
So, how many liberals hate “liberals”.
While he is certainly not a mainstream conservative, he considered himself a conservative.
To deny it and say that he was a part of “the left” is Kool-Aide drinking propaganda at its worst.
Umm, yeah, you need to rethink your definitions of liberals, and even conservatives. This man is a racist, hate filled, twisted murderer. His politics are nothing more than his own messed up reality intruding into the civilized world.
His views are so far removed from political importance, I have to shake my head that you try to make this about liberal/conservative or democrat/republican labels.
Hitler believed that socialism was a right-wing ideology totally opposed to Marxism:
http://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/111hit1.html
“1. ‘National’ and ’social’ are two identical conceptions. It was only the Jew who succeeded, through falsifying the social idea and turning it into Marxism, not only in divorcing the social idea from the national, but in actually representing them as utterly contradictory. That aim he has in fact achieved. At the founding of this Movement we formed the decision that we would give expression to this idea of ours of the identity of the two conceptions: despite all warnings, on the basis of what we had come to believe, on the basis of the sincerity of our will, we christened it ‘National Socialist.’ We said to ourselves that to be ‘national’ means above everything to act with a boundless and all-embracing love for the people and, if necessary, eve to die for it. And similarly to be ’social’ means so to build up the State and the community of the people that every individual acts in the interest of the community of the people and must be to such an extent convinced of the goodness, of the honorable straightforwardness of this community of the people as to be ready to die for it.” - April 12th, 1921
Leave A Reply