<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movie Review: Three Days Of The Condor – Blu-ray Disc</title>
	<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121078</link>
	<description>High-quality English language analysis and editorial writing on the news.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 07:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: MacGruber</title>
		<link>http://www.bloggernews.net/121078#comment-1719535</link>
		<dc:creator>MacGruber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.bloggernews.net/121078#comment-1719535</guid>
		<description>After just viewing it, I noticed: why weren't Redford's eyes glazed over from reading small font actual BOOKS all day long in multiple languages;   "We read every book printed in the world".
Otherwise a classic and could base that on first 15 minutes alone.
Now in Blu-ray: "the scene was controversial for its sexually explicit content at the time"- 1976.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After just viewing it, I noticed: why weren&#8217;t Redford&#8217;s eyes glazed over from reading small font actual BOOKS all day long in multiple languages;   &#8220;We read every book printed in the world&#8221;.<br />
Otherwise a classic and could base that on first 15 minutes alone.<br />
Now in Blu-ray: &#8220;the scene was controversial for its sexually explicit content at the time&#8221;- 1976.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

